Thread by @ncdave4life

@_jgtr @aqueorna @RARohde @BerkeleyEarth @hausfath It sounds ("probability," "more likely") like you think we have to guess about future effects. We don't.
We've already done the experiment. CO2 forcing trend has been approx. linear for 40yrs. The feedbacks already happen & the consequences are measurable.

@_jgtr @aqueorna @RARohde @BerkeleyEarth @hausfath "Saturation" & similar confusion about feedbacks is rife in the climate biz. My undergrad degree is in Systems Science (the discipline which studies feedback systems), so I've compiled a list of known & hypothesized climate feedbacks (+ discussion), here.
sealevel.info/feedbacks.html

@_jgtr @aqueorna @RARohde @BerkeleyEarth @hausfath The warming, itself, is barely noticeable, & obviously innocuous. So the Climate Industry touts supposed harmful secondary effects, like greatly worsening sea-level rise & extreme weather. But those harms are not actually happening.

threadreaderapp.com/thread/1532051…

@_jgtr @aqueorna @RARohde @BerkeleyEarth @hausfath The "climate emergency" is a marketing ploy. There is no climate crisis. It is a fabrication, to sell you products like wind turbines, solar panels, and ethanol -- and to elect politicians backed by the Climate Industry.
businessinsider.com/brilliant-mark…

@_jgtr @aqueorna @RARohde @BerkeleyEarth @hausfath They don't CALL it an "emergency" for nothing!

@_jgtr @aqueorna @RARohde @BerkeleyEarth @hausfath The POLITICAL narrative and Climate Industry PR spin is that manmade climate change is dangerous, but the scientific evidence is compelling that manmade #ClimateChange is modest & benign, and CO2 emissions are beneficial rather than harmful.

@_jgtr @aqueorna @RARohde @BerkeleyEarth @hausfath The best peer-reviewed science shows that CO2 emissions are beneficial, and the "social cost of carbon" is negative.

sealevel.info/negative_socia…