Thread by @Sussex_Hive

Tom Bower's web of lies. I don't have much audience but I'll try to regroup all the lies as they get debunked 🧵

Tom Bower: Emma Watson refused to meet with Meghan at an event in 2015.

The truth:

Another one

And another one:

Not to mention the #DuchessofTights gate which would deserve a whole thread by itself. A 4-year smear campaign started by the infamous Camel Toe

Another one

This!

The gift keeps on giving

Tommy Tommy Tommy 🤦🏿‍♀️

"An acquaintance"

Even the Palace...

The charities she worked pre-Harry praised her actions:

The Vogue cover. OMG Tommy, Google is free 🤷🏿‍♀️

"I never put in stuff that isn't true and can't be checked." Another lie, Tommy ?

So, What was Thomas's nickname for Meghan ? Flower? Bean?

When did Meghan's parents get divorced? 1983? 1987?

Wait! One truth: Meghan grew up as an only child!
Not a good news for Scammy's lawsuit tho 🤷🏿‍♀️

So here, Tom basically calls Meghan a liar when she says she didn't know much about the Royal Family. The fact than she might have AM's book on her bookshelf doesn't mean she lied. Nor does watching Diana's wedding or funeral. Try again.

College fees : Thomas says he paid her college tuition. In a court document, Meghan acknowledges it AND confirms getting a scholarship. So who is lying, the one who presented the full picture or the one published half-truths?

Denying your own daughter's experience about race. TM is definitely the facteur of the decade!

So (according to Tom) Meghan didn't like being possessed by her then partner T. Then he says T proposed to her to secure the relationship. And THIS is supposed to make Meghan look bad???

Either Tom Bower is lying again, or this family dynamic is odd. Who meet their niece for the first time when the niece is already 30?

About race:

Then Tom Bower : "(...) Race still remained unmentioned by Meghan (...)"

Interesting: Meghan wrote a whole piece in Elle in 2016. In this article she mentioned the racist tweet.

elle.com/uk/life-and-cu…

One shot at Omid. Refusing to trash Meghan does not mean he is her spokesperson. But that's to hard to understand I guess 🤷🏿‍♀️

Abt the Larry King interview with Patrick Adams : "Meghan looked unusually unattractive with greasy hair, rumpled clothes and peaky eyes." Oh, so now you became a beauty/hair expert ?

This said I would be happy to look THIS unattractive 🤣

Tom Bower: "Noticeably, no photo of Meghan with Williams appeared on The Tig" Right, but she gave a whole interview. As a journalist, would you say that a photo would have been better ?

Guys, my battery is low and I am away from home, I'll resume as soon as I can.

Another thread to follow. The more the merrier 💪🏿

Tom Bower: no 'ancestry' in Malta.
Meghan's paternal family tree and her great great grandmother's death certificate mentioned Malta as place of birth.

Also Tom Bower : "To give the story greater attraction, Mary Bird was said to have been employed as a cook in 1856 at Windsor Castle."

Mary Bird's mother is mentioned in the castle's records.

Tom Bower : Meghan urged a senior advisor in UN Women to promote her ambassador

The advisor's own words:

Meghan's former (according to Tom Bower) : "‘Do you know what you’re doing? Do you know anything about him?’ Meghan replied, ‘I’ve googled Harry. I’ve gone deeply into his life.’"

Funny that she never mentioned that in her previous interviews

Diana being chased to death by the paparazzi is a "Hollywood fiction"???? Pardon me???

The 2nd target in this book is Omid, qwhite interesting... Not to mention M. Al Fayed, who would be "dishonest".

Tom Bower: Harry was forced out of the army. If true, I strongly believe his haters who had let this out long time ago.

Former agent*

"She wanted the relationship to be publicised", "outing Harry"
Sure, and you can prove it is Meghan who contacted the UK tabloids 🤷🏿‍♀️

Says the kettle to the pot:

The pointless obsession with Omid is something!

- Rude and racist are not the same. Comparing Meghan's harassment to Charles' is a nonsense
- The "race card", really? After the "almost straight outta Campton" headline?

Hmmm, interesting.

Continued

"Her on-screen father was ghosted"
Ghosted AND invited to her wedding ?

"To please Harry, the Queen agreed to ditch centuries of tradition. Meghan would be fast-tracked into the Royal Family before the wedding."
Untrue: this happened before

Not to mention Charles and Camilla 🤷🏿‍♀️

Was Thomas Markle denied help or did Thomas Markle refuse help?

Meghan's famous 5 am emails... she didn't explain if the staff was expected to answer instantly. But got smeared for years for sending those emails.

Oh dear, if only it was abt a single racist post... the same gaslight.
KP's Twitter and IG flooded by racists posts, M's Wikipedia page hijacked with racist slurs and images, the #m*xgit emerged here, later, a racist tweet on Archie, 2 days old Lili attacked too. To name a few.

Well, I've now reached the first half. I may do some sporadic fact checks going forward. Didn't expect that level of amateurism 😶

And remember: "I never put in stuff that isn't true and can't be checked." TB

Here we go again

The Master of unverified facts can't verify if this one is true or not. Doesn't take such gloves when it comes to painting M in a bad light 😒

Oh look, another "acquaintance"!

Harry's feminism didn't start with Meghan.

Flash back to Meghan's trip to Rwanda... and another receipt. Thank you Claire for pointing this one!

"There was no place for her because she wanted to overturn the monarchy."
There was no place for her not matter what she did. She couldn't stand a chance

This excellent piece from @royal_suitor explains it all :
royalsuitor.medium.com/will-the-house…

Here is detail thread about lies and double standards:

Former agent*

A good analysis regarding the Procter and Gamble ad :

Continued

"At least, Meghan no longer had to remember to cross her legs when sitting."
Do you mean like this?

Wait, all of a sudden the so-called former 3rd rate actress has power and influence ? But you said that ... never mind.

About H&M encouraging people to register to vote at the 2020 IS election: "of a political party was not acceptable for the Royal Family."
Sure:

About Netflix and "the Crown". The RF wasn't bothered back by Netflix then.

RELEASE. THE. REPORT.

The Oprah ITV. Meghan said the RF was talking about CHANGING the 1917 convention that would make her children Prince/Princess when Charles becomes King. Not that Archie should be a prince at birth. Stop the gaslight.

H&M were not invited to Obama's birthday. So what? All this nonsense originated from "biographer" An*ela L*vin. The person who befriends with online trolls and share conspiracy theories on Twitter

To give an idea of who she is:

The 17 inaccuracies in the Oprah ITW.
1/ What are they?
2/ How many inaccuracies in this book?

Fellow squaddies, we are in the book 🥳🥳🥳🤣🤣🤣

Oh... a dig at P*ers Morg*n.
Gunfight at the O.K. Corral?

So, the ITV chief executive received Meghan's complaint on P Morg*n as woman and as a mother... and maybe as TV channel executive ?

This man will never take accountability for the continuous harassment on Meghan. All because he was not invited to her wedding

Harry would lack of understanding in finance by linking Better Up with the Commonwealth trust
1/ the QCT is an independent association
2/ the access to Better Up is free for the young entrepreneurs, as mentioned on their website

Meghan won her case against the #DailyFail because the judges are unsympathetic the press. Of course.

Safiya Umoja Noble's book "algorithms of oppressions"!was released in 2018, way before Archwell was created.

"At the end of March 2022, Kate and William became victims of Meghan’s and Harry’s fevered self-promotion."
Of course

Boohoo

Wow wow wow. All of this, from the "irrelevant" couple? The 6-in-line and the "unknown" actress ? 🤔

This is it. I didn't expect to spend so much time on this. I may have missed some spots, sorry about that. And sorry if words don't come as expected, English is not my first language. This book was sometimes hard to read, so much energy spent on trashing a human being. 1/

Whether you like Meghan or not, no one deserves to be treated this way.

I may add some RT to keep the fact-checking going on. Thank you all for reading and following.

@threadreaderapp unroll please!