Danielzo (maker arc) Profile picture
quit law, built communities, accidentally started a neobank. maker @calibermoney / founder @gmfactoryxyz

Aug 23, 2022, 12 tweets

1/ Two crypto chads - Jack (J) of @cosmos and Kyle (K) of @multicoincap - recently butted heads on Web3's direction of travel via @Cryptocito’s (CC) YT.

Are Cosmos appchains sound? Or will the space aggregate towards 2-3 layer-1s?

Let’s see what they said.

2/ CC asks about the #appchain thesis:

K says appchain thesis is 98% flawed. The only variable that matters is growth, and L1s haven’t finished growing.

J says that appchains will enable #composability that made DeFi so good in the first place, future-proofing the industry.

3/ CC asks about #scalability (P1):

K believes 2-3 L1s will dominate 90% of the market. Appchains increase complexity and friction, while L1 efficiency is far from its final form. Scalability is not as big a challenge as people think.

4/ CC asks about scalability (P2):

J says chains are like computers. Just as one super computer can’t handle all internet traffic, one chain can’t on-ramp all economic activity. We should build with the future in mind, and scale horizontally.

5/ CC asks about sovereignty (P1):

K says sovereignty for sovereignty’s sake is an overblown requirement. Credible neutrality must openly exist. In the case of @dYdX, and for value-exchange, modifying consensus is useful - otherwise it’s all hot air that increases overhead.

6/ CC asks about sovereignty (P2):

J says it's key to new #blockchains, curing dependencies. No one cares if an app has total control, as long as the underlying structure is credibly neutral. Users want their own run times, especially with #IoT, exchange, and other products.

7/ CC asks about developers:

J says that devs have increased in quality, but so have the tools to plug them into Cosmos, which is going to pay dividends.

K says developer ease-of-use is the wrong variable to optimise for and there shouldn't be one overarching programming model.

8/ CC asks about value capture (P1):

K says that, historically, those who tried to set a ‘standard’ have struggled to accrue value back to their main platform. It never works and renting security feels like a mistake.

9/ CC asks about value capture (P2):

J mentions RedHat, Linux, Google, and Cisco, citing their involvement with open source software that has recaptured value, but admits the current model may only work for 10-20 chains.

10/ It was a lovely, respectful debate between Kyle and Jack, with both offering intelligent, nuanced comment on ‘path dependence’ - and what that path looks like.

Kudos to @Cryptocito for moderating this titans clash. Can’t wait for the next one.

11/ Enjoyed this breakdown? Steady lads, deploying more content 🫡

Do RT and shoot me a quick follow to see more guides, fundamentals, research, summaries, and upcoming controversial opinions, as all things should be.

12/ And lastly, a round of applause to @jackzampolin & @KyleSamani for their awesome work in furthering our industry!

Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.

A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.

Keep scrolling