Thread by @tomiahonen

Lets understand 'Trump still holds classified documents' story

FIRST: this is NY Times of propaganda parrot Magamaggot Maggie Haberman fame. Do not read or subscribe to NY Times, it is the print equivalent of Fox #FixFox and is spinning a pro-Trump angle to any story

Second, this story is NOT from Dept of Justice. Garland's DOJ does not leak. This story was PLANTED by Trump attorney

Do not, dammit fall for ANY spin by Trump attorneys in believing it to be the full truth. Come on! Whatever story from #Trumpoworld is leaked - TRUTH IS WORSE

Because this NY Times story references internal squabble between Trump attorneys, this story was planted by a Trump attorney. And clearly the side of his lawyers who want Trump to hand over remaining documents

So this could be the Three Million Dollar Man, Kise on losing side

But timing sounds like Giuliani's tricks, when Rudy was attempting to get a plea bargain deal from Dept of Justice (who clearly were not interested)

This COULD be that the Bobblehead is finding DOJ uninterested in her testimony (because they already have all witnesses they need)

Now are there still classified documents at large? That evaluation was conducted already. All of the 13,095 documents (approx 91,665 pages) recovered from Mar-A-Lago have been already viewed, and any 'unjacketed' secrets have been re-united with their empty folders, so DOJ know

Remember. This NY Times story does not even CLAIM that any classified documents are still missing. It quotes Trump attorneys who claim to have heard a federal investigator SUSPECT that some documents were still at large - AT SOME POINT in the past.

Search of Mar-A-Lago came as a total surprise to Trump. The DOJ court filings revealed MULTIPLE informants NEAR Trump - that he was TOTALLY unaware of

So FBI knew. If FBI had SUSPECTED Trump also hid classified docs in his other homes, they would have included in search warrant