Thread by @Navi_Valkyrja

Let's dive into the lie that Amber never turned over her devices, shall we?
🧵

Depp's team was NOT entitled to confiscate Heard's devices. They were entitled to relevant data (ie; photos on abuse dates) obtained through an forensic imaging of her devices by her expert Julian Ackert, supervised by Depp's expert Bryan Neumister.

Following the forensic imaging - there would be an extraction of relevant data. Depp's team was required to "make arrangements" for the required hardware and software for this process.

A neutral 3rd party was to filter the relevant photos. This party Craig Young did not have the right hardware and there were delays caused by software crashing. Again it was the responsibility of of Depp's team to make arrangements for said hardware.

The declaration of Julian Ackert confirms that the forensic imaging and extraction supervised by Depp's expert then sent to a neutral party for filtering took place

Unhappy with delays - Depp's team filed santioncs

This was Heard's team's response

You can find the court order, Ackert's declaration, Neumeister's declaration, and the LONG chain of e-mails between each sides attorneys, experts, and neutral party on pg. 665-725 of unsealed document Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motions in Limine #IStandWithAmberHeard

Biased judge denied forensic imaging and extraction of Depp's devices but did require him to produce "native files with metadata" of his recordings and injury photos THEN granted team Depp's motion to suppress Ackert from giving testimony regarding the authenticity of these files

Elaine perfectly summarizes why the motion for sanctions over discovery was bullshit in her argument against team Depp's motion to suppress Julian Ackert's testimony from the trial (Defendant's Opposition to Plaintiff's Motions in Limine pg. 81-91) #IStandWithAmberHeard

After reading responses from Depp supporters - Here is Part. 2