Thread by @ShaykhSulaiman

I have been following the Andrew Tate story and @syriangirl updates. It appears I agree with her on several unrelated topics but in this issue her bias is glaringly obvious and this clearly impacting her updates. Let’s look at the claims of abuse that are purported. #FreeTopG /1

The incident is being used to show that Tate abuses women. The issue is this woman has stated on numerous occasions that it was consensual role play. What @syriangirl is saying is that you should not believe the woman involved. This is bad journalism. tiktok.com/@narutoz..edit…. /2

Then there is this post. @syriangirl writes “Andrew Tate beat multiple women with a belt and not all say that it was actual.” She then posts some blurred pictures. So is it Andrew Tate who allegedly beat this woman? You would think so, based on Syrian Girls post. /3

She later posts a less blurred post, but this time she posts “Andrew and Tristan women beating was not always consensual”. But then what does the actual post say? /4

The woman who posted is a sex worker and she says “I didn’t consent to be hit that way”. So she consented to be hit, but not in that way. What was the issue, was it 10% more harder than expected? Once again a lack of clarity./5

But what’s worse is the girl mentions it was Tristan and not Andrew, despite attempts by Syrian Girl to muddy the info and make you believe its about the more viral person.

One would assume that this type of sexual behaviour is abhorrent, but is this actually the case? /6

This is a wider discussion about sexual practices in society and how people have been desensitised that these practices are getting worse.

As an example ‘50 Shades of Grey’ was the best selling book of the decade and sold more than 35 million copies. nbcnews.com/news/amp/ncna1…. /7

Even if you are against Andrew Tate there has to be at least some journalistic integrity. Report in an accurate manner and then let people judge the alleged evidence. /8

#FreeTopG