Thread by @TheRealVerbz

In this thread, I'll introduce the brilliant work of Dr. Edward Dowdye.
Credible Challenges to General & Special Relativity, Doppler Shift Theory & more.
If Einstein were alive today, he would concede to Dr. Dowdye's scientific evidence and mathematical proofs.
#BlackHistory

The brilliant work of Dr. Edward Dowdye
web.archive.org/web/2022012216…

Why Should We Question Relativity? (FAQs)
web.archive.org/web/2022010508…

Optics, Electrodynamics & Gravitation based from Re-Worked classic physics/ Galilean Transformations under Euclidean Space
drive.google.com/file/d/1hxvzGr…

16 Peer Reviewed Papers by Dr. Dowdye.
Hosted by NASA and Harvard:
ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/search/q=dowdy…

Propagation and Re-Emission of Light:
web.archive.org/web/2016033114…

Natural Philosophy Bio:
wiki.naturalphilosophy.org/index.php?titl…

More background for Dr. Dowdye:
sciencewoke.org/scientist/dr-e…

Plasma Physics - Flaws & Corrections:
photos.app.goo.gl/UMtr6CvhttWXET…

Double Slit Re-Emission Explanation:
web.archive.org/web/2021090621…

Inelastic collision and Conservation of Kinetic Energy
web.archive.org/web/2022012022…

More regarding collisions and center of gravity.
web.archive.org/web/2016033115…

Gauss’ Law of Gravity:
web.archive.org/web/2021090609…

Gravitational Lensing in Empty Vacuum Space Does Not Take Place:
naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/…
 
An Ideal Inelastic Collision Model using Center-of-Mass Frames Shows Conservation of Kinetic Energy
naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/…

The Shapiro Delay: A Frequency Dependent Transit-Time Effect
naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/…

Gravitational Light Bending History is Severely Impact-Parameter Dependent:
naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/…

Dr. Dowdye's work dismantles Albert Einstein's Relativity.
Gravitational Potential Gradients and Refraction in Space #BlackHistoryMonth
rumble.com/vbtco9-dr.-edw…

NASA Engineer Disproves Claims of Light Bending by Relativity. #BlackHistoryMonth
Stars Bend Light by Refraction, Not Gravity:
rumble.com/vbtccv-refract…

Dr. Edward Dowdye corrected over 120 years of Einstein's flaws.
#BlackHistoryMonth

Dr. Dowdye discusses the misconception of #GPS and atomic clocks that are said to validate Relativity.

Ron Hatch - GPS Co-Inventor and internationally recognized expert of 50 years disputes Relativity. Wrote a Book called "Escape from Einstein" which details how GPS has nothing to do with Relativity.
gps.gov/governance/adv…

Dr. Essen - Atomic Clock Inventor Rejects Relativity
naturalphilosophy.org/site/harryrick…

Relativity & PopScience Mythology
alternativephysics.org/book/GPSmythol…

Paul Marmet - GPS & Illusion of Constant Light Speed
newtonphysics.on.ca/illusion/

The Collapse of Lorentz Transformations
newtonphysics.on.ca/lorentz/index.…

Ron was friends with Dr Dowdye. Ron was going to rewrite his book Escape From Einstein to correct his errors but died before he got a chance. Ron still used a luminiferous aether to distort packets rather than re-emissions of secondaries without need for Aether or 4th Dimension.

When Albert Einstein published his General Theory of Relativity (GR) in 1915, he proposed three critical tests... insisting in a letter to the Times of London that if Any one of these three proved to be wrong at any time in the future... the whole theory would collapse.

Alternative to the Perihelion of Mercury & Radio Binary Pulsar System (PSR) 1913 +1916 under Classic Physics.
Mass remains constant in Galilean Electrodynamics.
The mathematical equivalent to Relativistic procedures yielding the same predictions & solutions without Relativity.

Alternative to Gravitational Redshift and more by Dr. Edward Dowdye
#BlackHistoryMonth

I put all the slides from my presentation (and more) into 1 article.
Challenging Relativity and current models of Gravity.
Complete with equations, video links and corroborating material.
Lists of References, Citations and Peer Reviews included at the end.
steemit.com/science/@verbz…

Understanding the differences between Relativity (Lorentz Transformations) vs Effectivity (Galilean Transformations)
Dr. Edward Dowdye reformulated Classical physics equations that yield the same predictions and solutions as Relativity but without need for #Relativity at all.

The consequences of re-interpreting all past experiments and observations under Galilean Transformations is catastrophically devastating to #Relativity and over 100 years of accepted "facts".

It's the duty of the scientific community and all "peers" to acknowledge & understand a new model that yields the same predictions and solutions as Realtivity, but in a more simplistic and elegant manner. EVERY alleged "proof" of Relativity can be dismantled and reinterpreted.

Alternative to Gravitational RedShift from Dr. Edward Dowdye. Using only elementary math & Galilean Transformations. Einstein said, if there were any other methods able to derive the same predictions and solutions at any time in the future… that relativity would not be needed.

Some challenges to Gravitational Lensing based upon real observations and data collected from #NASA satellites.

Actual observations over 14 years by the Max Planck Institute showing NO Lensing whatsoever and NO distortion whatsoever. Relativity simulations insist we SHOULD see rings of light as stars pass behind an alleged #BlackHole
The depictions by Relativity have NEVER been observed.

@elonmusk When I post a clear HD GIF or video clip... it is butchered by Twitter's compression of the file.

Light only Refracts at the boundary of a celestial body. Light does NOT progressively bend around a celestial body as depicted by Relativity's model of gravity and non-existent space-time curvature.
When you shine a light at a glass lens, the light bends ONLY AT the surface.

Hopefully Twitter compression doesn't pixelate these next couple tweets...

Gauss' Law of Gravity applied to the Solar Plasma Limb.

Gravity does not bend light. Nor does gravity have ANY direct effect on electromagnetic radiation as Relativity depicts. The effect is only INDIRECT.

Challenges to Gravitational Lensing & More:
web.archive.org/web/2021090706…

Gauss’ Law of Gravity:
web.archive.org/web/2021090609…

Gravitational Lensing does not exist.
#Einstein Rings do not exist.

The most commonly used phrase I hear when trying to discuss these topics is, "That's above my pay grade."

Who is willing to step their game up and spend the time to understand these credible challenges that can change the entire world's understanding of Space, Time, Matter, Energy, Gravity and Light?!

Checkmating #chatgpt3 in 2 minutes or less. Can't wait for #chatgpt4 to have wider access to material that I can sort through.
Been waiting for funding to hire graphic designers to make visualizations out of my diagrams and Dr. Dowdye/ Petr Beckmann's challenges to Relativity.

@elonmusk I would love to help program #truthgpt
It is crucial to have heretical and credible challenges to current Scientific models. if there is another way to yield the same predictions and solutions… But with an easier method, it should not be banned or censored.

Evidence can be re-interpreted using a completely different model to yield the same predictions and solutions, but with and entirely different process and understanding.

Take GPS for example.
Perhaps you've already heard that GPS, by the very fact that it works, MUST confirm Einstein's relativity; also that Time Dilation MUST be real.

But these are little more than popular fictions, according to the distinguished GPS expert Ron Hatch.
Here Ron describes GPS data that refute fundamental tenets of both the Special and General Relativity theories. The same experimental data, he notes, suggests an absolute frame with only an appearance of relativity.

Ron has worked with satellite navigation and positioning for over 50 years, having demonstrated the Navy's TRANSIT System at the 1962 Seattle World's Fair.

He is well known for innovations in high-accuracy applications of the GPS system including the development of the "Hatch Filter" which is used in most GPS receivers. He has obtained over two dozen patents related to GPS positioning and is currently a member of the U.S National PNT (Positioning Navigation and Timing) Advisory Board. He is employed in advanced engineering at John Deere's Intelligent Systems Group.

Ron wrote a Book called "Escape from Einstein" which details how GPS has nothing to do with Relativity. But rather has to do with re-emissions from different frames of reference.
(although Ron Hatch still used the luminiferous aether medium as a distortion of a primary rather than re-emission of secondaries)

Ron Hatch was friends with Dr. Edward Dowdye and was going to re-write his book to correct it because it was based on an Aether.
But Ron had to tend to his ailing wife who had parkinsons and dementia. So, for the last decade of Ron's life, he wasn't able to write another edition.

Petr Beckmann also referenced this error in his book called Einstein Plus Two.

Along with Dr. Louis Essen who developed an atomic clock.

And quite a few others.

So what people attribute to one model… Might not actually have anything to do with the claims in reality.
Thus the flaws of Lorentz transformations versus Galilean transformations.
gps.gov/governance/adv…

Dr. Louis Essen - Atomic Clock Inventor Rejects Relativity:
naturalphilosophy.org/site/harryrick…

GPS, Relativity and PopScience Mythology:
alternativephysics.org/book/GPSmythol…

Paul Marmet - GPS and the Illusion of Constant Light Speed:
newtonphysics.on.ca/illusion/

The Collapse of Lorentz Transformations - Paul Marmet:
newtonphysics.on.ca/lorentz/index.…

I was able to get a signed copy of Ron's book, Escape from Einstein.
Hidden behind the cover of the book was this short quiz Ron included.

Petr Beckman wrote a book in 1987 called Einstein Plus Two and it's a lot like Dr. Edward Dowdye's stance.
(Was Very difficult to obtain a hard copy).

Einstein Mistranslated:
rumble.com/v291asc-einste…

All this talk about black holes, white holes, worm holes... the only holes in nature are pink... but these nerds wouldn't know anything about that. 🤓

A video I put together to give people context to the differences between Classic Physics vs Relativity - History, Examples and Alternatives.
(This was deleted by YouTube because they say it specifically qualifies as "Medical Misinformation")

All the light you ever see is the re-emitted light from the electrons making up yourself.

It is never the same light from the Sun that comes in through your window and into your eyes. The electrons making up the window produces a brand-new secondary light, and then the electrons making up your eyes produce a brand-new tertiary light.

It is not the same light ricochetting off the surface of a mirror. The electrons making up the surface of the mirror absorb the incoming primary... which diminishes to zero... as those same electrons reproduce a brand-new secondary light as an equal and opposite reaction.

It is not the same light traveling from a distant galaxy to a telescope. The light is absorbed by intergalactic media and is then re-emitted as a brand new light. Traveling relative to the interfering medium.

It is not the same light detected during the double slit experiment. The electrons making up the sensor and detector itself are measuring the frequency of interference between the source and electrons making up the target.

It is not the same light refracting through a prism or lens. The electrons making up the prism/lens will re-emit and brand-new light internally and then again out the other side.

The same light never distorts and continues on.
It is a brand new light at every point of interference.
And that new light is traveling relative to the electrons making up the target...
All observers and sensors and detectors can ultimately only measure the re-emitted light from the electrons making up themselves.
And since all electrons making up an observer are traveling relative to that observer...
it serves the illusion that the velocity of light is the same to all observers.
It is not.
It is physically impossible to measure the velocity of any primary packet. The act of measurement introduces interference which produces a secondary.

"If the velocity of light is even a tiny bit dependent upon the velocity of the light source... then my entire theory of Relativity and Gravitation is false." -- Albert Einstein

Here is Part 2 of the Classical Physics versus Relativity.
This one more focusing on the differences of how time and gravity is perceived between the two models.
If time is indeed a constant and is Not relative... what would that mean for looking at distant objects through a telescope?
If time is constant... there is only Now to observe. We are not looking back in time when we see stars and galaxies.
In the video are some examples of what you would see through a telescope in Real-Time versus the delayed transmissions which propagate at the velocity of light.

This concept is Very difficult for people since Relativity tarnished the critical thinking process for many.
The first model you encounter will be the dominant one and psychologically what people will defend.
If you encountered the classic physics model first... you would find Relativity nonsensical and absurd.

Doesn't matter if you agree... just want people to understand the differences and consequences of the opposing model.

Who would you rather believe… Kneel DeGross Tyson, or Dr. Edward Dowdye?
🤡s like this will get the larger public to realize black holes do not exist.
Metallic hydrogen exists, which is a state of condensed matter that is so stable it is incompressible by definition. Making any alleged gravitational collapse or black hole formation impossible.
(We'll get to that in the near future in the thread.)

Petr Beckman - Howard C Hayden and Galilean Electrodynamics Clippings

Einstein Plus Two and Challenges to Realtivity drive.google.com/file/d/19RIGkg…

Dr. Louis Essen, Inventor of an Atomic Clock, was not fond of Einstein or Relativity.

Propagation and Re-Emission of Light.
On the Rectilinear Motion of Wavepackets
web.archive.org/web/2016033115…

The Shapiro Delay: A Frequency Dependent Transit-Time Effect
naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/…

Gravitational Light Bending History is Severely Impact-Parameter Dependent:
naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/…

Illusions of Relativity: Space-Time vs Real-Time

This is a Part 2 to the Illusions of Light and Time video.
This presentation is a comprehensive expose on the differences between Relativity and Reality.
Representing many years of intense research.

We are NOT looking back in time when we see distant galaxies and stars!
Relativity is opposite from Reality.

Realitivity uses the framework of Lorentz transformations.
But we will be interpreting light, time and reality under the framework of Galilean transformations.
These visuals and context will help people understand the stark contrasts between the two models.

The gravity and light that leaves a star continues to propagate out even after the star is extinguished or blows up or is destroved.

The bullet that already left a gun continues to travel out even if the gun is destroyed after the bullet leaves.

The water that already left a hose will continue to travel out even if the hose is turned off or is destroved.

The sound that already left a speaker will continue to travel out even if the speaker is turned off or is destroyed.

I don't expect people to agree... but I do expect people to take the time to understand the differences between the models.

In this video I provide some data to challenge the strongly held belief that time dilates and that the rate of reality is experienced subjectively between distant locations.

And I propose some thought experiments with some eventual physical experiments that can determine an unreconcilable discrepancy between Relativity's Space-Time model versus how we actually view reality in Real-Time. Regardless of distance.

Some references:
In this extensive Twitter/X thread, I introduce the brilliant work of Dr. Edward Dowdye. Credible Challenges to General & Special Relativity, Doppler Shift Theory and more.
Retired NASA Engineer, University Professor of Mathematics and internationally recognized expert in atomic physics, optics, LASERs and satellites.
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

In this extensive Twitter/X thread, I introduce the brilliant work of Dr. Pierre-Marie Robitaille.
His work is dedicated to new ideas about the nature of the sun, metallic hydrogen, thermodynamics, and the microwave background.

Pierre-Marie Robitaille, Ph.D., is a retired Professor of Radiology from The Ohio State University. In 1998, he led the design and assembly of the world’s first Ultra High Field MRI System. This brought on the need to question fundamental aspects of thermal physics, including ideas related to Kirchhoff’s Law of thermal emission and more.

The collapse of Kirchhoff's so-called law brings astrophysics back to the drawing board. No black holes, no dark matter, no big bang, no gas giant stars.
I posted in this thread at least once a day without fail for 5 months. The totality of Dr. Pierre's uploads and interviews to date. x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

Important Links and Documents. List of Credible challenges and alternatives to Dark Matter, the Big Bang, Relativity, LIGO, Composition of Stars, Doppler Shift and more.
Based upon plasma physics, optics, Galilean Transformations, classic equations, 3D Euclidean geometry and Occam's Razor. Data, experiments, peer reviews and references galore. Magnetics, Gyroscopes, Nanobubbles, Cavitation, Crystals, Cymatics and more.
(everything that YouTube deleted me for) tinyurl.com/23pnnkss

Plasma Physics - Flaws & Corrections: photos.app.goo.gl/UMtr6CvhttWXET…