Cymatics Experiments & "Sacred Geometry"

The information that allows humanity to stretch nature's laws and create things that do not readily exist in nature can be considered sacred. Achievements that could only come to fruition through the ingenuity of mankind through geometric perfection... that information is sacred.

Cymatics - Hans Jenny Vol. 1
drive.google.com/file/d/0B_01ue…

Kymatic - Hans Jenny Vol. 2
drive.google.com/file/d/1udKC4A…

The Shape of Sound - John Stuart Reid:
rumble.com/v237n0w-the-sh…

Human ingenuity and the human spirit allows for the discovery and fruition of those things using laws of geometry and laws of creation. And by that logic, we could consider that geometry as being sacred.

Sacred geometry isn't about platonic solids, and pretty shapes or just anything artsy that’s evenly spaced.
It's understanding the harmonic relationship of all the factors in a scenario in order to maximize it to geometric perfection. Achieving outcomes that are not readily found in nature, because it took humans to achieve it.

Like LASERs. Laser beams do not exist in nature.
Lasers were invented using the laws OF nature to perfection. The effects and results lasers can achieve can do things that do not exist in nature. Or can achieve things that only exist on massive celestial scales or fleeting faster than the subatomic scale.

There is harmonics of sound, light, color, electromagnetic induction... and even gravity.
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

Hypersonic Sound - Woody Norris:
rumble.com/vbv9rr-woody-n…

Defense Against LRAD
youtube.com/watch?v=CXKTBQ…

Coded magnets do not exist in nature. Their behaviors do not directly exist in nature. The results of magnetism can be found throughout nature, but not to the degree of coded magnets.

Magnetic waveforms do not exist in nature. The effects of harmonic magnetic fields in undulations can achieve things at a constant that only exist on massive scales and/or "quantum" (subatomic) scales.

Imagine cymatics combined with magnetization.
1) (Scroll up in thread for video):
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

2) Post with lots of links:
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

3) More magnetic test links:
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

So by using geometry and nature's laws in specific ways, we can maximize a scneario. By simply observing, even on mute, it allows for you mind to notice things and make connections that can be useful later. For putting it all together for the purpose of generating energy, increasing yield of crops, and improving lives.

Alleged healing with harmonic pulses of magnetism:
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

Cymatics applied to the machine shop to salvage a part:
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

Geometric perfection is beautiful to look at.
Coherence is key.
Systems that are coherent are like functional art.
"Free energy" is only achievable through harmony, resonance and accounting for geometric perfection on different scales. (Abiding by Laws of Thermodynamics)
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

Dr. Paul Brown's "Resonant Nuclear Battery"

Current nuclear theory suggests that you can only extract 0.063 watts of power from 1 gram of Strontium-90. A man named Dr. Paul M. Brown developed something called the Resonant Nuclear Battery. The technology can extract 7500 watts from that same gram of Strontium-90. That's over 100,000 times more energy than what is claimed is possible.

Appliances can be run and powered for 28 years... 1600 years, or however long you want. Depending on how you "program" the radioactive alloy to have a given half-life.

In late 1980s, Dr. Brown patented a resonant nuclear battery and successfully demonstrated a 75 watt prototype. It used a 2 millimeter long Strontium-90 needle to produce electricity comparable to NASA's Plutonium based RTGs which produce 0.54 watts per gram.
(See follow up comment for a demonstration)

Brown died under mysterious circumstances just after his company NuCell and Periphery Systems launched on the NASDAQ market. His partner and attorney Phil Talbert was witness to his efforts and stifling and wrote a book called "The Half Life of a Nuclear Battery."

Apparatus for direct conversion of radioactive decay energy to electrical energy:
patents.google.com/patent/US48354…

Alpha-Beta Voltaic Effect – NuCell Resonant Nuclear Battery:
rexresearch.com/nucell/nucell.…

The Half-Life of a Nuclear Battery – Amazon:
tinyurl.com/2zsnp4zk

Dr. Brown attempted to communicate with John Searl in the 1980s. He wrote 13 letters to John Searl because Paul Brown said he had built his own SEG unit called the DPU (Demonstration Power Unit) using a Strontium-90/Neodymium alloy.

On page 190 of the Half-Life of a Nuclear Battery it says that on July 12th, 1988, Paul communicated with Dr. Petr Beckmann saying:
“... But more important, though you may not realize it yet, your work may help to dethrone Einstein."

Apparently Petr Beckman met with Paul Brown and Petr analyzed Paul’s resonant nuclear battery and validated the direct conversion of radioactive isotopes to electricity. The larger version of the resonant nuclear battery (RNB) was called the Magnetron Atomic Generator (MAG).

The other version of the RNB is called the Ionic cell Battery (INB). The INB was independently reported on by multiple Ph.D. level nuclear engineers, some of which performed extensive work with NASA and the nuclear power industry. Some of those people included Dr. Stan Kaplan, Dr. David H. Johnson and Dr. Dennis C. Bley.

A US patent was issued in 1992 relating to the INB listed as Patent # 5,087,533 originally by IsoGen, Inc.

In the book, Half Life of a Nuclear Battery, on page 35 it says the unit measured 18 inches in diameter by 36 inches tall and delivered enough energy to power five homes at peak load. But then the book said it melted the transmissions lines because it was just too much current.

Brown’s resonant nuclear battery deals with alpha particles which can be stopped with a piece of paper and beta particles which can be stopped with 0.03 inches thick of aluminum.

So with a stainless steel or aluminum housing, the resonant nuclear battery would be safe since it doesn’t deal with gamma radiation or neutron particles. Just polarizes the alpha and beta particles, decelerates them and turns the kinetic energy into electricity through coherent motion.

The concept behind Dr. Brown's RNB is that it harnesses the radioactive decay to generate power at a constant based on the half-life of that material.
Spring-loading the alpha and beta decay.
As one lighter isotope is emitted... a heavier isotope knocks into it from the back while it's already in motion. Adding to the kinetic energy.

Imagine sprinting... but then someone pushes you from behind. Like an inelastic collision. Like a Newton's cradle. You will go flying forward with the additive force of the particle that is pushing you.

But at the same time, imagine someone grabbing your collar from the front and yanking you and lurching you forward (magnetic lens acceleration) AS you are sprinting (radioactive decay) AND being pushed from behind. (inelastic collision).
That a lot of added force to the charged particles in motion, in a particular direction. (electric current).

Searl's Cradle - Kinetic Energy Transfer at a Tangent:
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

A standard American household requires up to 10kW of energy available for all combined appliances on at the same time in the home and accounting for spikes when turning on an off the vacuum or something like that. Let's say 15kW to play it safe.

Strontium-90 has a half-life of 28 years. 1 gram can deliver 7500 watts at a constant. Adding mass means additive power. 2 grams can deliver 15kW at a constant.

That would require just 2 grams of Strontium-90 to power your house at a constant for 28 years before needing to replace the 2 grams because the battery would only be half as effective after the 28 years.
(It wouldn't be a sudden jump but rather a slow depletion and at the 28 year mark, the battery would deliver half the power as it did the day it was first started.)

Effectively turning the half-life of a radioactive material into a battery for the half-life of the material.

So... if you have carbon 14 with a 10,000 year half-life or something ridiculous like Thorium with a 14 Billion year half life... That would mean you could theoretically power your house at a constant for 10,000 years or at a constant for 14 billion years with just a minuscule amount of mass for fuel.

But you have to account for a radioactive alloy and the combined/ synergistic and spring-loaded effect it has on the total particles being emitted.

Brown wanted to use an alloy of something like radium, thorium and uranium. The resonant nuclear battery harnesses the radioactive decay to generate power at a constant based on the half-life of that material (or combination of materials).

A standard American household requires up to 10kW of energy available for all combined appliances on at the same time in the home and accounting for spikes when turning on an off the vacuum or something like that.
Let's say 15kW to play it safe.

Strontium-90 has a half-life of 28 years. 1 gram can deliver 7500 watts at a constant. Adding mass means additive power. 2 grams can deliver 15kW.

That would require just 2 grams of Strontium-90 to power your house at a constant for 28 years before needing to replace the 2 grams because the battery would only be half as effective after the 28 years.
(Again, it wouldn't be a sudden jump but rather a slow depletion and at the 28 year mark, the battery would deliver half the power as it did the day it was first started.)

But if you perform something exotic in a coherent state and deplete that energy too much, the half-life might be reduced from 10,000 years to 100 years. Or 1 year.
...Or 1 HOUR depending on how that energy is converted and for what purpose.

The point is that there's much more energy that can be harnessed in ways that mainstream models cannot fathom how it's possible. Because the mainstream models are wrong. You can't violate thermodynamics. You can only violate people's misunderstanding of thermodynamics.

The Laws of Thermodynamics Correctly Taught.
Addressing the flaws and presenting corrections/refinements:
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

Determining the kWh is trickier because the nuclear batteries deplete their effectivity over time. Due to the half-life of the nuclear isotope.

So if using Strontium-90 which has a half-life of about 28.8 years... that means a battery can deliver up to 7500 watts at a constant for 28.8 years. But... at the 28.8 year mark, the efficiency of the battery or amount of power if can deliver drops by half.

So what would be a simple equation of
Energy = Power times time ... E = P t ... that becomes a lot more complex because of the exponential decrease of the half life of the material over time.

But the answer is about 155,600 kWh for 1 gram of Strontium-90 over the course of 28.8 years.

If there was no depletion due to the half life, it would be almost 2 million kWh. But there's an exponential decrease over time, so the kWhs drop. But that can just be adjusted by using combinations of isotopes for a longer half-life.

REGARDING ATOMIC BOMBS:

Relativity claims that mass is converted to energy during inelastic collisions and that the energy is NOT conserved.

But it IS conserved, and there is no heat dissipation and loss of energy, or any conversion like relativity suggests in their equations.

With uranium 235, there is a difference of 13.3 MeV PER ATOM that is not accounted for by relativity... because they say that energy is "lost" due to mass converted to energy during a nuclear explosion.

That difference in energy is called a "mass defect."
It's not literal. But Lorentz invariance takes things that don't exist as literal.

Mass does not increase with acceleration or velocity. It's EFFECTIVE... NOT literal.
Thus the concept of effective mass under Galilean variance which is the mathematical equivalent to relativistic mass under Lorentz invariance.

Relativity says mass literally increases with acceleration.
m = mₒ / √1 - v²/c²
But Galilean variance says it's an illusion of surrounding potentials in a closed particle accelerator chamber.
Not the mass itself.
m_eff = mₒ / √1 - v²/c²

Dr Edward Dowdye conducted extensive tests with steel ball bearings in a newtons cradle with thermal couples, testing the so-called heat dissipation of an inelastic collision. There is NO heat dissipation.

Relativity/Lorentz invariance says
E = mc²
(Energy and mass are universally equivalent and literally interchangeable under All conditions.)

but Galilean variance says
E = Δmc² = mₒc²
(Energy changes in a system are the result from changes in mass. mₒ represents the original mass.
Mass and energy do not literally interchange. There is an equivalence, not an interchange.)

Here is Dowdye's peer reviewed paper on the tests and results.
An Ideal Inelastic Collision Model using Center-of-Mass Frames Shows Conservation of Kinetic Energy:
naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/…

I worked out the mass defect for different radioactive isotopes in my book 2 on Gravity to show the amount of energy NOT accounted for PER ATOM for about 7 different isotopes.
I properly calculated the difference for Uranium 235, Plutonium 239, Thorium 232, Cesium 137, Rubidium 37, Zirconium 36, and Strontium 90.

Dowdye's Extinction Shift Slide Show - LOTS of info!
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

Attached in the image below is a screenshot from my book using Dr. Dowdye's approach.

Discourses & Mathematical Illustrations Pertaining to Extinction Shift Principle Under the Electrodynamics of Galilean Transformations:
amazon.com/Discourses-Mat…

But to understand more about the fallacies of current nuclear theory... we have to address the double slit experiment(s). Did you know there are 4 different experiments with 4 completely different results that have nothing to do with each other? Most people think there is 1 test that magically flips back and forth from observation. That's a lie/fraud.
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…


Dr Paul Brown - Resonant Nuclear Battery Demonstration 1987

See next comment for one of Dr. Brown's presentations.

People still believe in black holes in 2025!?? Surely this has to be a troll?

All this, talk about black holes, white holes, worm holes… The only holes in nature are pink… But these nerds wouldn't know anything about that.

Problems with black hole theory and mathematics…
Kirchhoff's law is invalid.
Lane's Law is invalid.
Eddington's Virial Theorem is invalid.
Gravitational collapse is invalid.
Hawking radiation is invalid.

The math for black hole theory says the heat capacity of a black hole is negative. So the more mass that is added… The colder the black hole gets according to their math.
Yet they constantly contradict themselves, saying how there is either infinite heat in a black hole (as Stephen Hawking suggested in his books)… Or that there is negative heat. Which is a violation of thermodynamics.

The laws of thermodynamics are stable, and cosmologists do not get to arbitrarily violate those laws because they think they get weak signals from billions of light years away, which they say justifies overturning known laws of physics.

But these older equations they are using are violating thermodynamics, and what is called intensive and extensive properties.
What can now been known as the fourth law of thermodynamics.

If an equation has an intensive variable on one side, then the product of that equation must be intensive on the other side.
If an equation has an extensive variable on one side, then the product of that equation must be extensive on the other side.

Hawking, Birkenstein, Eddington, Lane, Kirchhoff, Planck, Penrose, Jeans, Parker, Susskind, Greene, Cox, Smoot, Penzias, Wilson and many many more have violated laws of thermodynamics in their papers and theories and simulations, because of outdated invalid equations.
This is catastrophically devastating to astrophysics, which brings it back to the drawing board. But people are still unaware.

Below are some references and discussions about the equations their flaws and corrections.

April 10th, 2019 - Claims of a Black Hole Image: The Day Astrophysics Died
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

Scientific Analysis - The Claim of Black Hole Image!
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

The Black Hole Image - Data Fabrication Masterclass!
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

The FOURTH Law of Thermodynamics? The 4th Law Explained!
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

Intensive and Extensive Properties - A Note of Caution!
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

Thermodynamics and the Virial Theorem - Do's and Don'ts!
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

Does Gravitational Collapse Occur?
Insight from the Laws of Thermodynamics!
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

Gravitational Thermodynamics - Is It Science?
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

Gases & Gravity - Boltzmann, Jeans, and Gravitational Fields!
x.com/therealverbz/s…

Eugene Parker and the Solar Winds!
x.com/therealverbz/s…

What are Black Holes?
Science or Science Fiction?
x.com/therealverbz/s…

Can Stars BEND LIGHT? General Relativity and Gravity with Dr. Edward Dowdye!
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

The Laws of Thermodynamics Correctly Taught:
x.com/TheRealVerbz/s…

Three Honest Astronomers Agree- The Black Hole Image is an Artifact?!
x.com/therealverbz/s…

Peer reviewed paper from M. Miyoshi, Y. Kato, and J. Makino, The jet and resolved features of the central supermassive black hole of M87 observed with EHT:
arxiv.org/abs/2205.04623

Challenges to Gravitational Lensing and More:
web.archive.org/web/2021090706…

Over 60 Papers by Dr Robitaille:
vixra.org/author/pierre-…

Extinction Shift Principle: A Pure Classical Alternative to General and Special Relativity,
Dowdye, Jr., E.H., Physics Essays, Volume 20, 56 (2007) (11 pages); DOI: 10.4006/1.3073809
quantumrealism.net/wp-content/upl…

Gauss' Law for gravity and observation reveal no solar lensing in empty vacuum space:
vixra.org/pdf/1807.0149v…

Gravitational Lensing in Empty Vacuum Space Does Not Take Place:
naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/…

The Shapiro Delay: A Frequency Dependent Transit-Time Effect
naturalphilosophy.org/pdf/abstracts/…


@Andercot

Part 1 of 5
Magnetic Waves, Induction & Coherence

This thread of videos will demonstrate some of the concepts of magnetic waveforms, magnetic bearings, and a completely revolutionary method of magnetization which results in exotic behaviors.

The video starts with a segment from Eric Laithwaite, the father of the Mag-Lev train. And giving a demonstration of a linear induction motor from his presentation called "The Magnetic River".

Rather than a straight track, we wrap it in a ring.

(These videos were deleted by YouTube... labeling everything as "medical misinformation.") Part 2 of 5
Magnetic Waves, Induction and Coherence

This video shows another demonstration from Eric Laithwate and the linear induction motor.

I show the non-linear induction motor as a comparison to show the same principles are applied... but to continuous motion in a particular direction of orbit.

The magnetic rollers transfer their kinetic energy like billiard balls... but this deals with a constant tangent.
So this is how charged particles behave a particle accelerator. But normally... those subatomic particles are too small to see, and that's inside of a giant tokamak or closed chamber like a hollow donut.
The magnetic fields confine the particles and the plasma in the accelerator chamber.

But we can mimic the same dynamics on a table top by showing the magnetic rollers are behaving similar to the subatomic particles in an accelerator chamber.
Transferring their kinetic energy without needing to physically knock around like a Newton's cradle.
It's like a magnetic version... but in a ring.

The more rollers present... the more they self-align and maintain that spatial coherence. Because they are compressing together and restricted from vibrating or clashing due to Lorentz force.

Current nuclear theory suggests that you can only extract 0.063 watts of power from 1 gram of Strontium-90. A man named Dr. Paul M. Brown developed something called the Resonant Nuclear Battery. The technology can extract 7500 watts from that same gram of Strontium-90. That's over 100,000 times more energy than what is claimed is possible.

In late 1980s, Dr. Brown patented a resonant nuclear battery and successfully demonstrated a 75 watt prototype. It used a 2 millimeter long Strontium-90 needle to produce electricity comparable to NASA's Plutonium based RTGs which produce 0.54 watts per gram.
rumble.com/v28pjnu-dr-pau…

Brown died under mysterious circumstances just before his company NuCell was set to launch on the stock market. His partner and attorney Phil Talbert was witness to his efforts and stifling and wrote a book called The Half Life of a Nuclear Battery.

Apparatus for direct conversion of radioactive decay energy to electrical energy:
patents.google.com/patent/US48354…

Alpha-Beta Voltaic Effect – NuCell Resonant Nuclear Battery:
rexresearch.com/nucell/nucell.…

The Half-Life of a Nuclear Battery – Amazon:
tinyurl.com/2zsnp4zk

Dr. Brown attempted to communicate with John Searl in the 1980s. He wrote 13 letters to John Searl because Paul Brown said he had built his own SEG unit called the DPU (Demonstration Power Unit) using a Strontium-90/Neodymium alloy.

Here is one letter: drive.google.com/drive/folders/… A man named Mark LeClair, of Nanospire, Inc, built a cavitation device in his garage for $250 that generated nuclear radiation and formed diamonds. (using only water, images of the results included in the first link below). He and his business partner were severely radiation poisoned for more than a year, lost their hair and almost died.

I was fortunate enough to host the Global Breakthrough Energy Movement Conference in Boulder, Colorado in 2013 where I introduced LeClair's presentation. Brilliant guy. (He kinda looks like Stew from The Hangover.)
Mark solved a 100 year old cavitation erosion equation mystery.

So... if Mark LeClaire found a method to generate nuclear radiation from cavitation of water in a closed cycle... and Dr. Paul Brown in the first post could directly convert the nuclear radiation to electrical current... then why not combine both of these concepts to bypass the need for nuclear reactors and refining fuel rods to ultimately just boil water and make steam?
That's only up to 30% efficient anyway.

The direct conversion of radioactive decay to electric output would be a big blow to the nuclear industry... As would the production of nuclear energy from water and the subsequent conversion of that on-demand.

Cavitation Experiment/ Results/ Theory of RNA & DNA Synthesis and LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions): drive.google.com/file/d/1AYj6Mg…

Take this viral - LeClair's Cavitation Experiments: drive.google.com/file/d/1Y6Q-0H…

WebArchive discussion of LeClair's claims and experiments:
drive.google.com/file/d/1Nu-Ski…

3rd Party Replication?: drive.google.com/file/d/1O_jJNG…

Cavitation Implosion Compared to Nuclear Explosion In Reverse:
rumble.com/vbuqfx-cavitat…

Once a day for the next couple weeks, I'll upload the updated slides from my presentation challenging Einstein's Theory of General Relativity, Special Relativity and Doppler Shift Theory.

There's about 100 images/ GIFs/ Vids total and a lot of related links/ citations, peer reviews with corroborating material.
I show why Dr. Edward Dowdye's "Extinction Shift Principle" gives justifcation to abandon Relativity and adopt a simpler model.

The consequences of Dr. Dowdye's reformulated Galilean Transformations being able to yield ALL of the same predictions and solutions as relativistic procedures are devastating to Relativity.

From Einstein's own words: "Wenn die Lichtgeschwindigkeit auch nur ein bißchen von der Geschwindigkeit der Lichtquelle abhängig ist, dann ist meine ganze Relativitätstheorie und Gravitationstheorie falsch."
{August 1913}
"If the velocity of light is even a little bit dependent upon the velocity of the light source, then my entire theory of Relativity and Gravitation is false."

There are two mutually exclusive frameworks of mathematical proofs that can derive the same conclusions but with completely different interpretations of the same evidence.
Math is not the End-All-Be-All validator, it's a tool.

Here is some mathematical proof under the framework of Galilean Transformations, rather than Lorentz Transformations like Relativity uses.
Some differences...

Relativity says time is relative:
t' ≠ t (Time is Relative and shifts in different Frames of Reference)
and t = tₒ / √1 - v²/c²
but Classical Physics says Time is NOT Relative:
t' = t (Time IS the same from ALL frames of reference)
and τtr = τₒ / √1 - v²/c²

Relativity says
c' = c (The velocity of light is the same from ALL frames of reference)
but Classical Physics says
c' ≠ c (The velocity of light is NOT the same from all frames of reference)
and that
c' = c ± v (The velocity of light in one frame of reference is dependent upon the velocity of the light source relative to an observer in another frame of reference. Whether that light source is approaching or receding away from that observer)

Relativity says
E = mc²
but Classical Physics says
E = Δmc² = mₒc²

Both Relativity & Classical Physics says
δθ = 4GM/Rc²
but Relativity says it's gravity bending light/ the curvature of Space-Time and classic physics says it's refraction ONLY at 1 solar radius.

Relativity says mass increases with acceleration.
But Classical Physics says it's an illusion of surrounding potentials in a closed particle accelerator chamber.
Not the mass itself.
meff = mₒ / √1 - v²/c²

So, rather than having a knee-jerk reaction, saying "it must be wrong because it disagrees with relativity."
Try saying, "How do Galilean Transformations interpret the same scenario differently than Relativity?"


This information is being freely shared for educational purposes. To inform people to the existence of Dr. Edward Dowdye's brilliant work.
As well as, to present substantiation that can revolutionize how the world thinks about Time, Light, Gravity and how we perceive Reality itself.

In this thread I'll present info on #Nanobubbles, their fantastic properties and how they can help clean the #OhioChemicalDisaster ... and more!
This technology is mainly in Japan. I've tried for years to get others in the US to pay attention, form businesses and help people.


Had to reupload these vids to #rumble because #YouTube says it's MEDICAL MISINFORMATION...
When enough nanobubbles latch onto an impurity in a body of water... the impurity will rise to the surface to form a scum. Vacuum off and you have pristine water. rumble.com/v1cfj6d-cleani…

In this thread, I'll introduce the brilliant work of Dr. Edward Dowdye.
Credible Challenges to General & Special Relativity, Doppler Shift Theory & more.
If Einstein were alive today, he would concede to Dr. Dowdye's scientific evidence and mathematical proofs.
#BlackHistory


The brilliant work of Dr. Edward Dowdye
web.archive.org/web/2022012216…

Why Should We Question Relativity? (FAQs)
web.archive.org/web/2022010508…

Optics, Electrodynamics & Gravitation based from Re-Worked classic physics/ Galilean Transformations under Euclidean Space
drive.google.com/file/d/1hxvzGr…

There was no Big Bang. Redshift and the Z measurement is completely misconceived. Here is just a fraction of the evidence presented by Eric Lerner. In this thread, I will post over 30 detailed sources to substantiate.
plasma-universe.com/eric-lerner/

SEG Voltage Controlled Homopolar MockUp Demo 10V @ 2 amps = 8 lbs moving 200 orbital RPM/ 1450 Centripetal RPM.
See comments for detailed explanations.
Consider it as a hydroelectric dam on the quantum scale. The "media" is the internal kinetic energy of electrons. #GreenEnergy What is the SEG Mockup? - (Searl Effect Generator - Steemit Article)
#GreenEnergy #physics #magnets #quantum
steemit.com/steemit/@verbz…