The @nytimes is a “Republican protection racket”. Its editors use linguistic tricks + word choices TO whitewash Republicans:
Instead of “extremists” “neofascists” “radicals” they’re “hard right” “right”
@nycscribe make up your mind!
A🧵
@Sulliview @susanbordson @nhannahjones
These word choices are NOT neutral or “objective”. They are editorial activism.
In this one piece the NYT editors use 5 different #FraudulentEuphemism for the radical extremists who wish to eliminate much of our Govt and social safety net.
@MarkJacob16
nytimes.com/2023/03/08/us/…
Euphemism scoreboard
Arch-conservative
Hard-right
Euphemism scoreboard:
Hard-liner
Arch-conservative
Hard-right
Euphemism scoreboard:
conservative
Hard-liner
Arch-conservative
Hard-right
Euphemism scoreboard:
Most conservative
conservative
Hard-liner
Arch-conservative
Hard-right
@froomkin @jeffjarvis @ParkerMolloy
authors of this piece @hillhulse @CatieEdmondson please define these terms you use to describe these Republicans?
Are these euphemistic directionalities of “hard right” correlated with other issues beyond economic? Rights of women for example.
@RepMTG has a bigger agenda
This piece astounds. The Republican proposal “defunds the police”. Not by a little.
Is it the @nytimes position that defunding counterintelligence by 50% is only a throw-away line?
Euphemism scoreboard:
Far right
Most conservative
conservative
Hard-liner
Arch-conservative
Hard-right
The whitewashed “very serious person” was Trumps budget director.
@AGSNYT were you alive for the Trump catastrophe? Why pay journos to whitewash his admin?
Euphemism scoreboard:
On the right
Far Right
Most conservative
conservative
Hard-liner
Arch-conservative
Hard-right
@owillis @tomwatson @soledadobrien @AndreaChalupa @Will_Bunch
Oh. The @nytimes “Republican normalization machine” is going full speed ahead.
“Politically charged” amazing @hillhulse this is legendary. The destruction of the US social safety net & Govt is framed in “politics”not consequences to Americans.
@jayrosen_nyu
More politics BS “Conservative” Gaetz, Greene etc = seditionists who asked for pardons but here they are whitewashed by NYT.
Would the cuts cause pain for Americans @CatieEdmondson ?
Who is the audience for this piece.
NYT accepts+propagates the GOP “austerity” frame.
As “independent observers” shouldn’t the authors get a statement from Republicans about tax increases?
Econ 101:more than one way to reduce a budget deficit.
Accepting the GOP refusal to any popular/needed increases helps GOP
Reminder. Stop supporting @nytimes with your wallet and esteem. Support smaller local outlets and independent journalists.
RT: Question for @nycscribe what is the Editorial position of NYT on the most accurate descriptor for @RepMTG
Hard right? Hard line?
(Ans: neofascist)
Thread continues. 👇
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.