Thread by @danmurrayserter

Joe Rogan, Elon Musk, and few others are bidding:

$2.62 Million for Vaccine Scientist Peter Hotez to debate RFK Jr.

The goal of the debate is to highlight:

• Misinformation
• Conspiracy theories
• And the safety of Covid 19 vaccines

- Here's the breakdown:

Presidential candidate Robert Kennedy Jr went from conspiracy theorist to the hottest topic on Twitter thanks to a vaccine debate with $2.62 Million and counting on the table.

Here's the story:

RFK went on Joe Rogan's podcast and said many things, some sounded convincing, and others, less so.

But free speech is free, so:

• Joe Rogan
• Elon Musk
• Bill Ackman
• Steve Kirsch
• Andrew Tate
• Patrick Bet David

And many more are baiting vaccine expert Peter Hotez $2.62 Million to debate Robert Kennedy publically...

Source:

Firstly, in the spirit of information vs misinformation, let's break down some of the main claims that were made by RFK which have already been challenged by experts:

First, Joe Rogan admits that he used to think RFK Jr. was "kinda loony," but he's now a firm believer in RFK's antivax statements.

RFK Jr. Believes that cell phones and WiFi causes cancer, mitochondrial damage, and "leaky brain"

Which is debunked here: shorturl.at/gklUW

Based on a single cherry-picked correlational study, RFK says that a DTP vaccination is extremely deadly.

Debunked here: shorturl.at/hBLSW

We eventually reach covid vaccination conspiracies.

For example, "Ivermectin was suppressed so that the vaccines could get Emergency Use Authorization."

Also debunked here: shorturl.at/shortener.php

RFK claims Remdesivir killed 53% of Ebola patients, and the CDC decided to administer it to Covid patients.

Remdesivir is ineffective against ebola and covid.

Debunked here: shorturl.at/FHTYZ

Source:

Obviously, RFK's claims were all debunked

Which is great (Depends on your narrative)

But Peter Holtez isn't exactly innocent either:

In May 2021, Peter called for mass vaccination of children to develop herd immunity.

The media favourably pushed his story.

And because of him, millions of children have been unintentionally harmed.

Read more: usnews.com/news/national-…

However, his opinion on vaccines was a full 180 in 2020.

So why did he suddenly change his opinion and mark all critics as anti-science?

Because he received a substantial amount of 'contribution money' from the Vaccine Institute Inc.

Which some suspect it may be from the Gates Foundation.

Peter also stated that people who criticize vaccines and other pharmaceuticals be labelled as: "anti-science" and "anti-semitic"

Demanding that they be treated like terrorists.

Source:

Not a very good look for Peter Hotez either.

It's no surprise that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is running for the 2024 presidential election.

He has:

• The golden name
• An Anti-Vaccine stance
• CIA conspiracy theories

And more importantly...

Utilizing the public's mass distrust in Big Pharma and vaccines.

While Peter Holtez has every reason to defend vaccines because his records have Big Pharma written all over them.

People also sense the feeling that he'll break down with facts after facts thrown at him.

But whether or not RFK or Peter Holtez are telling the truth...

People are already taking sides, Anti-Vaxxers VS Pro-Vaxxers.

And it's going to get bloody if both sides remain grey.

As you can see, we need a proper debate to clear the air.

Not just between them. But between the people, the government, and Big Pharma.

I think the public has been 'shadowed' about what Covid vaccines can truly do to your body because they're many types of vaccines, not just Pfizer.

Public support for vaccines in America is at 68%.

2020 was filled with fear and uncertainty because of Covid.

But the vaccination of Covid was even more so.

Information about long-term effects on the human body was not discussed enough in the media.

Hence the conspiracy theories and Anti-Vax standpoint.

Presidential debates often rest on a single topic as the focus, whilst its surprising vaccines are back on the menu - it feels like the American public haven't had closure on it yet, so interest in it is surging again.

What do you think? Are you pro, anti or.... over it!

Hope you enjoyed this thread.

The debate has yet to happen but I sincerely hope it does soon.

Follow me @danmurrayserter for more:

• A.i
• Braincare
• Tech trends
• Mental health
• Entrepreneurship

If you like this thread, like and comment your thoughts.

Check out my podcast Secret Leaders

Where I interview 200+ of the top business leaders on earth in one of Europe's top business podcasts:

Here 👇
link.chtbl.com/57KKM0ZK

All sources of debunked claims:

shorturl.at/gklUW
shorturl.at/hBLSW
shorturl.at/shortener.php
shorturl.at/FHTYZ
usnews.com/news/national-…