Thread by @patel_patriot

I may have found something... 👀

Was John Durham working with a partner?

Recently released communications between the Office of AG Barr and Durham reveal another individual who appeared to be jointly working with Durham at the onset of the Russia Collusion Hoax Probe.

Thread👇

Communications between former AG Bill Barr's aide, Seth Ducharme, and John Durham at the onset of Durham's probe into the origins of the Russia Collusion Hoax reveal that John appeared to be working with another individual to run the investigation.

"John and [redacted]"

An email exchange titled "Logistics for new project" show multiple occasions of Ducharme referring to two individuals, one of which is still redacted.

Ducharme even asked if a meeting time "works for you both" to which the response was "we will call you at 9am..."

Further emails show Ducharme searching for office space to house the investigation for "John and [redacted] and their team."

If John Durham was the one tasked with this probe, why is it being referred to as "their team," and not "John's team" or "Durham's team."

Ducharme would inform both Durham and the redacted individual that the space was ideal.

The name is redacted due to exemption (b)(7)(c). So it's very likely this person is another investigator.

What's even more interesting is some of the communications are still being redacted due to exemption (b)(7)(a).

"...production of such law enforcement records or information...could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement proceedings."

So a few questions.

1. Who is the other individual working with Durham to launch the probe and why is he still redacted?

2. If Durham's investigation has concluded, how can these communications interfere with "enforcement proceedings?"

3. Are 1 and 2 correlated?

Sauce

Emails: documentcloud.org/documents/2053…

DOJ Exemptions: justice.gov/oip/doj-guide-…