Thread by @drawandstrike

There are various theories being kicked around by people I respect very much as to why reporter @jsolomonReports sat on a very important Biden Crime Family story for 4 years.

The theories run from he was too scared to break the story himself to he was part of the coverup.

When it comes to why Solomon sat on the story of the Hunter Biden global phone purchased & given to "Pop" for Biden Crime Family off-the-books bribery & influence peddling deals, I'd like to propose my own theory, base don a broad knowledge of Solomon's role in RussiaGate.

Many times Solomon had key sources inside the federal government give him vital information and he broke the story.

Such as Bruce Ohr's notes detailing how Glenn Simpson of Fusion GPS told him the mains source for the Steele Dossier was a former Russian intelligence officer now… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

But this Biden Crime Family phone story is different. Solomon is personally involved in it, getting the phone number, calling it, hearing Joe Biden answer and then quickly hang up on realizing the phone was now burned.

Why sit on this knowledge that Hunter Biden's shady firm had purchased a global phone for Joe & was paying the bill for it, and that the phone was being utilized to run the Biden Crime Families off-the-books illegal enterprises?

While Biden was running for President?

There is a **legal** possibility as to why John Solomon could **not** be the first person to publicly divulge this.

If that global phone is part of the evidence in an on-going federal grand jury case.

As we just saw with Durham, even a Special Counsel can't publicly divulge grand jury evidence when being questioned on live TV in front of a Congressional committee.

It is actually an illegal act to leak grand jury proceedings, or evidence from such proceedings.

As a reporter, if he had broken this story at any time over the last 4 years, and been the first to divulge the existence of the global phone, and that he had verified personally that Joe Biden was using it, & it was grand jury evidence, Solomon would have been in legal jeopardy.

Allow me to point out that while the unbelievably corrupt DOJ/FBI are **perfectly fine** with leaks of grand jury material and other federal investigations when it suits their nefarious purposes, Solomon is a reporter who's been a thorn in their side for years.

Time and again in his reporting on the RussiaGate scandal, Solomon broke key stories that helped expose the 'joint venture' between the Clinton campaign, Fusion GPS, Perkins Coie, the FBI/DOJ & the State Dept.

If he leaked grand jury evidence, do they cover for HIM?

Of course… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

Of course they don't move to protect Solomon if HE'S the first to publicly leak federal grand jury evidence.

They would step on him. HARD.

But now that a WHISTLEBLOWER has come forward, and SOMBODY ELSE first divulged the existance of the global phone & Joe's use of it?

NOW Solomon can tell the story.

And he wouldn't be in any legal jeopardy from doing so. Its already out there.

So if there is a federal grand jury, and there is an on-going investigation where this phone is part of the evidence, Solomon was SMART to keep his mouth shut.

So I thought I'd just throw that competing theory out there.

He sat on the story for 4 years not because he was scared, or because he was part of a coverup.

He sat on it because he'd be in legal jeopardy if he leaked it because its GJ material in a federal investigation.

My take on the current reporting is that there's a key whistleblower who was once highly placed within the Biden Crime Family who has been cooperating with federal investigators and is now talking to House Committees doing their own investigation.

Its very likely Devon Archer.

Tony Bobulinski was only approached for one specific venture to help create a front group for the Biden Crime Family.

This whistleblower [not the IRS guy, that's a different one] appears to have intimately involved in many aspects of the BCF's many illegal endeavors.