Thread by @realjusthuman

Huddleston v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
(Seth Rich FOIA case)

New Order from Judge Mazzant
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

Background:

Last week, in addition to the absolutely fire joint filing that I threaded about here

threadreaderapp.com/thread/1745878…

And presented on my show here
rumble.com/v47nnyl-fbi-fa…

The Plaintiff, Huddleston, asked the judge for clarification on his November 28, 2023 Order.

Specifically, Plaintiff wanted to know whether that Order was intended to answer docket entries #73 and #77 only?

Or was it also intended to answer #105 and #112 as well?

The Judge says #73 and #77 ONLY.

Which means #105 and #112 are still open and he has yet to rule on those.

And that is tantalizing!

Because...

Dkt. #105 concerns CROWDSTRIKE.



It is a motion asking the judge to ORDER the FBI to:storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

And Dkt #112 concerns whether the FBI should be compelled to do the following:
storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

So, for those of us who care about and are eagerly awaiting disclosure of the information on the Seth Rich laptops, dvd, tape drive, and the metadata, here is the state of happenings:

-FBI failed to comply with Judge's ORDER to propose a timeline for disclosure.

-Huddleston proposed that the majority of FOIA'ble ifnormation be published not less than 120 days out from the November 2024 election.

And as concerns other areas of disclosure related to this matter:

-Huddleston is asking for disclosure of any and all records/reports concerning Crowdstrike, Seth Rich, the DNC, WikiLeaks, emails, data transfers, Michael Sussmann, etc...

-Huddleston is also asking the judge to decide whether the FBI should be compelled to search is digital evidence files, Lynk messages, Teleporter records, surveillance and geolocation data, missing forms, CIA and other agency records, CHS records, ALL reports re: DNC "hack", and adequacy of searches.

But, ya know

; )