Tracy Beanz Profile picture
Editor-in-Chief @UncoverDC & https://t.co/GJxlKMmRYN | Contributor-The HighWire | https://t.co/h7EIXWj16n| Substack| https://t.co/L9Ynuppm3C #CARNIVORE

Feb 2, 2024, 23 tweets

🚨READ: The first presentation of the FL Grand Jury investigating COVID.

Note: they state they aren’t finished yet.

I will offer perspective and thoughts once I’ve read this.

LINK: acis-api.flcourts.gov/courts/68f021c…

Federal officials and agencies refused to testify and can’t be compelled. Further, report acknowledges inflated numbers due to cash incentive benefitting hospitals.

GJ acknowledges inflated death numbers arising from passing “with” rather than “from” COVID.

Additionally, acknowledges a cash “death” benefit granting hospitals and families who agreed to “COVID” death a financial incentive.

What was the actual IFR? (Infection Fatality Rate) This Grand Jury through testimony got to as accurate a number as they could —

Comorbidities? Not the biggest predictor of fatality. Age dwarfs them. They criticize the CDC for attempting “simplicity over accuracy.”

Attempts by proponents of lockdowns, school closures, etc, to “memory hole” COVID decisions stating they didn’t have scientific data are futile. Data was available - it was ignored and attacked.

It wasn’t an “information” problem. It was a “judgement” problem.

Lockdowns were acknowledged not to have a net benefit and be implausible in stopping the spread - but media coming out of China changed the minds of the people saying they didn’t work.

In short, they were useless in stopping the spread, and in small targeted areas *may* have postponed spread - or “flattened” the curve. The result would always be the same - infection. It’s just how long it would’ve taken.

They deconstruct the “studies” the CDC uses to inflate and manufacture the efficacy of masks. They do a good job.

😷

There should’ve been an RCT on the efficacy of masks - but the CDC said no one thought to run one. So the GJ cites a meta analysis by Cochrane.

Officials in our tax payer funded agencies knew masks had little to no efficacy at stopping or slowing the spread of COVID. They just wanted to control you.

Read it. Absorb it. Understand it. Vow to let it never happen again.

They even address the “spittle” defense the Fauci’s of the world made about stopping you from spitting and spreading the virus.

And another reason for inefficacy - COVID is spread via aerosol. Read this.

They knew it spread this way but it was never discussed and they knew in 2020. The GJ states the inefficacy of masks (even N95 again) and questions whether we’d have the plexiglass shields that separate us everywhere STILL if the truth was known.

(They wanted to control you.)

The fact this was hidden actually HARMED high risk people into feeling they were safe when…they weren’t. Wearing a mask does not protect you.

Since they knew it was aerosolized they also knew that “social distancing” was useless and people should’ve more been focused on ventilation, if anything. So, no - there was no good logical reason to stand 6 ft away from each other or have to sit in chairs in circles or to not be allowed to GO TO A PARK. OR A FUNERAL. OR CHURCH.

It was safest on planes and in hospitals due to HEPA. Tyrants took over.

And guess what? UV LIGHT WORKED. 4/17/20 uncoverdc.com/2020/04/17/let…

Conclusion thus far, no one “followed the science..”

More to come.

Additionally, see my next few posts about the makeup of the GJ, who can impact its findings and what it can and can’t do:

The GJ is apolitical, and diverse across all demographics.

They can issue indictments and presentments. What we just read was a presentment.

Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.

A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.

Keep scrolling