Thread by @ShaykhSulaiman

HOUSE OF COMMONS 'SECURITY THREAT' CLAIMS DEBUNKED

The Zionist lobby has demonstrated its power and control over the UK Government and Opposition. The fact that a motion proposed by the Scottish National Party (SNP) favoring Palestine was subverted for Keir Starmer, the Labour Party, and Israel has exposed the extent of foreign influence on the UK government.

When exposed, the response was to resort to the age-old racist/Islamophobic trope: 'Blame Muslims'.

Th claim of "Securtiy threats" against members of the house has zero basis or evidence, but they don’t care about that; their sole aim was to ensure a vote on SNP motion was diverted by any means necessary, albeit to incite a mob to attack Muslims. These tactics were used to demonize Muslims for more than a decade, but no more; their propaganda will be exposed.

The chaos in the House of Commons was orchestrated entirely to appease their Zionist masters, as was the subsequent blaming of Muslims.

The objective is to vilify Muslims and criminalize protests.

We will break down what happened, which politicians acted in favor of a foreign nation, in this case, Israel, and the reasons why.

Let’s look at the evidence. /1

The SNP tabled a motion which included condemning Israel's war crimes. This motion was groundbreaking. A Western nation complicit in Israeli war crimes was not only going to call for an immediate ceasefire but also expose Israel's war crime of 'Collective Punishment.'

Relevant and compelling statements in the motion were as follows:

“That this House calls for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and Israel.”

“Death toll has now risen beyond 28,000, the vast majority of whom were women and children”

“And an end to the collective punishment of the Palestinian people; and recognises that the only way to stop the slaughter of innocent civilians is to press for a ceasefire now.” /2

The Labour Party, now heavily influenced by the Zionist lobby (evidence will be provided in subsequent tweets), proposed amendments to make the language of the motion more favorable to Israel.

Keir Starmer, instead of prioritizing the best interests of his party and the will of the public, aligned himself with the Zionist agenda. Despite the potential division within his party, with many Labour MPs supporting the SNP motion, he proceeded with amending the motion in favor of Israel.

The key differences were as follows:

Labour specified that a ceasefire must be based on "humanitarian" grounds and removed references to “collective punishment” of the Palestinians. /3

The Israeli state would have vehemently opposed the SNP motion, and the Zionist lobby's chosen leader, Keir Starmer, could not have allowed it to pass, however a large contingent within his party members were planning to support it.

The reason is that the overwhelming majority of British people are against the Gaza genocide. Pro-Palestinian activists, predominantly white, have been protesting in significant numbers in the UK.

Attempts to portray these protests as solely Muslim-driven have failed and all such claims were proven unfounded, as Muslims constitute only around 3% of the UK population.

The protests have drawn large crowds almost every weekend, with some days seeing up to 1.3 million protestors. Considering the +18 population of UK is 45 million, this indicates widespread support for Palestine among the people of the UK.

This figure only takes into account individuals who are able to participate in protests. It does not mention the number of people supporting Palestine who are unable to attend protests. The British people stand with Palestine, and this sentiment is particularly strong amongst Labour Party voters.

Given this context, it’s logical that a number of Labour Party MPs would have heeded the will of their constituents and vote in favor of the SNP motion, rather than aligning with the preferences of and direction from Keir Starmer and Israel. /4

Keir Starmer was facing a potential revolt, with up to 100 Labour MPs poised to vote against the party line and align with the SNP.

These MPs had already decided to support the SNP motion, rendering any claims that Speaker Lindsay Hoyle intervened for Keir Starmer due to threats to MPs or potential 'terrorist attacks' nonsensical. Even if the threats were genuine, which is hard to believe, how would it have altered the outcome? If Hoyle hadn’t intervened, the only parties losing out would have been Starmer and Israel, not the constituents or the MPs.

Hence, it’s evident that this breach in protocol favored Keir Starmer and Israel. They have essentially exerted significant influence over parliament, demonstrating that the UK is no longer a sovereign nation. /5

Initially, claims which surfaced suggested that Lindsey Hoyle had been blackmailed, with a Newsnight political editor reporting that a Labour source informed him of threats made to the Speaker.

Allegedly, comments such as "you will need our support after the election and this may not be forthcoming" were used as leverage. /6

Lindsey Hoyle, the Speaker of the House, took the initiative to alter the narrative even further.

Initially, he informed the House that the reason for breaking protocol and effectively disregarding the SNP motion in favor of Keir Starmer and Israel was because the Standing Orders and Parliamentary procedures were "outdated."

A day later he abandoned this theory, and subsequently shifted the reason to concern for the safety of the MPs. It appears the groundwork to blame Muslims for this breach of convention had started to be laid.

They rallied Zionist-affiliated MPs, the mainstream media, and their social media influencers to echo the same assertion.

However, anyone with discernment would recognize that this decision was solely made to benefit Keir Starmer and the Israeli lobby.

They achieved their objective: quashing the motion against Israel, averting a rebellion against Starmer, and vilifying Muslims as the scapegoat.

It’s a well-worn strategy. /7

The question arises: Why would Lindsey Hoyle break convention for Starmer and Israel? The answer is simple: he is a Zionist who prioritizes the agenda of the Zionist lobby over the interests of the UK or its citizens.

His father, Lord Doug Hoyle, was a founder of Labour Friends of Israel. /8

Some may argue that Lindsey Hoyle's father's affiliations don't necessarily influence the son's ideological perspective.

However, by his own admission, they do. Here he clearly states that his 'family history' motivates him. /9

That's not all; Lindsey Hoyle embarked on the Israel propaganda tour in November 2023 - one month after the day that started the Genocide on Gaza .

Those who have participated in this propaganda tour have undergone a significant shift in their position, becoming even more explicit in their Pro Israel stance.

In my view, this tour played a monumental role in Hoyle's decision to depart from convention for Israel and Keir Starmer. /10

Keir Starmer is an outspoken Zionist. He once stated, “I support Zionism without qualification.”

His actions and complicity during the Gaza genocide unmistakably demonstrate that he is indeed a Zionist without any "qualification."

It is evident that he was chosen by the Zionist lobby to lead the Labour Party after they worked to oust Jeremy Corbyn with unfounded allegations of Anti-Semitism.

Starmer was groomed for leadership a decade ago with the intention of prioritizing the needs of the Israeli state over those of the UK and its citizens.

These events in the House of Commons serve as a glaring example of this agenda. /11

In 2011, whilst serving as the head of the Crown Prosecution Service, Keir Starmer met with Moshe Lador, the State Attorney of Israel.

Just four months later, Starmer intervened to prevent the arrest of Tzipi Livni in London, Israel's former foreign minister, on charges relating to war crimes.

Under what circumstances is it deemed acceptable to wield power and act on such power in the UK, solely for the benefit of a foreign nation?

It appears that when it comes to Israel, its representatives have mastered the art of exerting influence over foreign territories without encountering any resistance. /12

Source: @kennardmatt

So we know that, not only has Starmer been anointed by the Israel lobby, but he has also been kowtowing to their demands on UK soil.

However, post October 7, in addition to receiving instructions from the State of Israel, Starmer went on the same propaganda tour as the Speaker of the Commons, Lindsay Hoyle.

Here are some images of the tour, which, as explained earlier, leads individuals to become further radicalized towards the Zionist perspective.

In the case of Starmer, he didn’t need any more help, but I believe this was his way of, once again, proudly showing his allegiance and receiving instructions from the State of Israel. /13

In the clip below, Keir Starmer admits he has been having ‘private talks’ with the President of Israel. It is clear, based on analysis of the information, that this was an impactful factor behind him and the Speaker of the House of Commons breaking convention in Parliament.

In the original video, Starmer says he also spoke to Blinken and the Qatar PM, but the point still stands. Based on all the information provided, his engineering of the vote, along with Hoyle, was clearly done for the benefit of the Israeli lobby. /14

They claimed that the breaking of convention was ultimately for the safety of MPs - to protect them from backlash of their constituents or 'the mob', and prevent a 'terrorist attack'. In reality, the only parties who benefited from the rigging of this vote were Starmer and Israel.

Contrary to the above, it’s apparent that MPs facing actual threats receive no support and no convention-breaking actions are undertaken for their safety.

Whilst @georgegalloway was an MP for Bradford West, he received real and tangible threats on a frequent basis but received zero protection, support or coverage.

One of these threats materialised into a violent assault, when MP George Galloway was brutally attacked on the streets of London in broad daylight by a Jewish man, who was eventually convicted.

However no remedial plan was put in place for protection of MPs and very little coverage was given to the incident at the time.

Here is a statement by George:

“As one who suffered serious assault whilst an MP (and failed to attract any protection from Speaker Bercow, or interest from media except @OborneTweets ) I'm following with interest the outrageous false conflation of righteous anti-war protest with terrorism. MPs need protecting from terrorists not from the public least of all their own constituents.” /15

Here is another message, this time from the longest serving black female MP from Starmers Labour party, who has faced more abuse than most MPs.

She was suspended from the Labour Party in April 2023 for stating that black people receive more prejudice than Jewish, Irish, and Travelers. We know the real reason she got suspended was because she dared to believe she faced more prejudice than Jewish people. In the mind of most people there's nothing wrong with one minority believing they face more abuse than another minority. However, in Starmer’s Labour Party, you cannot hold such a view, he called this perspective "Antisemitic".

This is despite allegations of bullying, racism and sexism within the Labour party being found when the Forde report was published, after a long investigation. One such finding was that some of the attitudes expressed towards MP Diane Abbott in private WhatsApp messages represented “overt and underlying racism and sexism”. This didn't appear to matter to Starmer, as much as protecting and shielding Israel from any criticisms.

Here is her statement that accurately identifies where Starmer and Israel want to go with this catastrophe they have created of a Democratic process: to ban protests and ultimately turn the UK into a police state.

“I get more abuse and threats than most MPs. But the suggestion that police could close down peaceful demonstrations outside MP’s offices, town halls and Parliament is appalling. The first step towards a police state.” /16

Here is an example of what propagandists label as abuse: a person emails and asks the following question to an MPs team member:

“But how can you work for an MP who turns a blind eye to a sniper killing children? How do you sleep at night? Are you not haunted by the slaughter? This is on you too.”

This MP's response was to claim that this was abuse. The level of drama, propaganda and victimhood is at unfathomable levels.

This, along with the statements of Diane Abbott and George Galloway, clearly seems to indicate that there were no real or significant threats to safety of MPs. And even if there were, as both of them have stated, this is a common practice or occurrence when one runs or sits as a Public figure and Member of Parliament. It appears nevertheless that such threats appear to be dismissed for those who arent as eager to 'tow the pro Israel line'. /17

Here is Paul Sweeney, Labour Party MP for Glasgow, who was caught lying about violent protests where he claimed protestors had stormed his office.

He wrote a tweet where he cited the false attacks at his office as an example of MPs being under threat.

The police not only dismissed his fictitious claims, but video evidence showed white Pro-Palestinian activists protesting in a peaceful and calm manner. I only mention the race because the Zionist-controlled media and MPs will have you believe it’s mainly Muslims protesting, which isn’t the case.

This isn’t about Muslims or Islam; it's about pro-humanitarians from all races and religions taking a peaceful stand, as is their democratic right to do so. /18

It’s evident that the fiasco engineered in Parliament has nothing to do with MPs facing death threats.

So, what is it really about?

That's clear from the proliferated, organized and coordinated attack during, and immediately after, the House of Commons debacle.

It was to demonize Muslims, make protests illegal, and move the UK towards becoming a more draconian society.

A police state where the Zionist-controlled leadership tells you what you must think and believe.

Their agenda was clear, but they're so accustomed to manipulating the public that they thought they wouldn’t get exposed. But they were wrong.

Here are just a few examples of the orchestrated attack to blame Muslims when evidently this decision was only made for Starmer and Israels benefit: /19

This coordinated attack involved MPs, members of the mainstream media, and social media.

The same individuals who decry Anti-Semitism at the mere notion of disagreeing with the actions of the State of Israel, went into full-blown Islamophobia mode.

That's their modus operandi: they appeal to identity politics when it suits them, but when it comes to attacking Muslims or Islam, they believe they have carte blanche. /20

Their propaganda and manipulation may be effective on those who lack the skills of critical thinking. Historically, this is how they operated, however the difference now is that more people have become wary of their actions.

Below the post of Sky News are comments attacking Islam and Muslims, which demonstrates that they were effective in their plan against the less intelligent members of the population. /21

Remember Paul Sweeney, Labour MP from Glasgow mentioned earlier in this thread?

It transpires he worked for BAE Systems and jokingly claimed he had shares in the company which is a key manufacturer of parts for Israel's F-35 fighter jets used in Gaza.

He also had to pull out of an Israel-linked arms trade event after being exposed a couple of weeks ago.

This may explain Sweeney’s eagerly made, false claims to the police.

Somehow, they are always linked to Israel or the military-industrial complex. /22

Here is Robert Jenrick, Conservative MP for Newark, following instructions and blaming the Speaker's breach of convention on Islamic extremism, despite clear indications it was for Starmer and Israel. It seems even opposing political parties come together to protect Israel and making Islam the scapegoat.

I explained the reason for their plan, it is quite simplistic, as this MO has been successful for decades. But the question is, why Robert Jenrick?

Let’s examine his connections to Israel and the Zionist lobby. /23

Robert Jenrick was previously reported for receiving 'direct instructions' from Tory donor Richard Desmond.

Richard Desmond, ranked 107th in the Times rich list, is a Jewish Pornographer.

Desmond has donated thousands to Anti-Palestine groups.

Once again, this sheds light on Jenrick's attack on Islam and Muslims and his protection of Israel and the Zionist lobby. /24

Jenrick is married to Michal Berkner, an Israeli woman. His three children are also being brought up in the Jewish faith.

He is vehemently against the BDS movement, and his first official visit as Communities Secretary was to the Jewish community.

This clearly elucidates the reason for his protection of Israel and why he decided to turn the Commons fiasco into an Islamophobic attack on Muslims. /25

Here is Andrew Percy, Conservative MP for Brigg and Goole. He claimed, "I felt safer in Israel than I do in this country."
We will examine the veracity of those claims, but what is the reason for his eagerness to protect Starmer and Israel and his blatant attack on the Pro-Palestinian movement?

Well, once again, for most of these MPs, all roads lead back to Tel Aviv. /26

Having worked in Goole, I can say that the working class are no pushovers. So, I was surprised to learn that someone like him would have a panic attack over words being projected onto Parliament. And let me be clear, those words are not a call to genocide; that was mere propaganda.

But digging deeper, one finds that Percy has many connections to Tel Aviv.

He said, “My auntie always said we were Jewish!” and then converted to Judaism in 2017.

Converted to Judaism isn’t the issue; it’s Zionism that’s the problem, and his conversion was ideological. /27

You may say I’m just using Zionism to muddy the waters, but that’s far from the truth. Here is proof: just like Keir Starmer and Lindsay Hoyle, Andrew Percy also went on the Israel Propaganda tour. It’s a pattern with these Pro-Israel Islamophobes.

Also, he claimed Israel was safer. Does he wear a bulletproof vest while working the streets of Hull? This is simply ridiculous propaganda. /28

Bringing this back to the Labour Party, 40% of the Labour cabinet receives money from Israel lobbies, as reported by @declassifiedUK

Once again, a foreign nation has influence, not just on Keir Starmer and Andrew Percy, but also on 40% of Labour MPs. The Zionists have control over both parties, which led to the protection of Israel on the Gaza vote and the subsequent attack on Islam. /29

@declassifiedUK It doesn’t just stop there. Labour MP for Kingswood, Damien Egan, is married to an Israeli spy for 'Special Unit 8200'. /30

Here is Former Labour MP Joan Ryan, during her tenure representing Enfield (London), engaged in discussions with Shai Masot, an Israeli agent, regarding a £1 million "donation" from the Israeli Embassy. Masot was plotting to take out other MPs critical of Israel.

This illustrates a well thought out methodology of exerting control over those in power in the UK. Evidently, this is not a mere conspiracy theory. /31

Conservative MP Priti Patel was embroiled in controversy after being caught, on more than one occasion, making undisclosed trip to Israel whilst she was a Government Minister.

She was also found to have secretly discussed allocating British foreign aid money to the Israeli army.

The extent of foreign influence on MPs holding significant positions in Parliament is indeed shocking. /32

Suella Bravermann is an unpleasant character, having been dismissed several times, yet persistently resurfacing in the political arena.

The reason behind this resurgence is straightforward: her connections to Israel and her Zionist husband. Individuals of her ilk enable the maintenance of UK being controlled by foreign nations, in this instance, Israel.

Bravermann, another Zionist with Israeli ties, aims to vilify Islam and transform the UK into a police state.

Her attacks were anticipated and align with the pattern illustrated in this thread.

Despite Israel's influence over the UK, Bravermann et al propagate fear of a nonexistent Islamic control. /33

Suella Bravermann is not only married to a Jewish Zionist with ties to Israel but also disclosed to the Jewish Chronicle that "We have close family members who serve in the IDF." It remains unclear if those relatives are British citizens.

Once again, she prioritizes the interests of a foreign nation over those of the UK. /34

There have been tens of millions of citizens who have gathered in London to protest against the genocide in Gaza, and the protests have been almost entirely peaceful. It's a testament to the protestors whose activism is rooted in humanity.

However, there was one occasion where the police were violently attacked, including being targeted with fireworks. According to reports by The Independent, Suella Bravermann allegedly incited her associate Tommy Robinson and his followers to attack the police.

The violent attacks by this small group of hooligans are evident.

Ironically, Sunak declared that fireworks could not be used in protests, creating the impression that Palestinian protestors were responsible, when in reality, they were utilized by Tommy Robinson and his associates.

Tommy Robinson's financiers are also Zionists who support him in his attacks on Muslims.

This pattern is not new.

Do you see it yet? /35

This dangerous propaganda against Muslims and flouting of Islam as the scapegoat to keep the power of the Israel Lobby hidden has led to a 335% increase in attacks on Muslims since October 7th.

It's important to note that many attacks on Muslims go unreported. This means that the actual number is significantly higher and likely underreported. /36

Conservative MP Miriam Cates of Penistone and Stocksbridge revealed what they truly fear, and it isn't violent attacks or mobs.

They fear for the State of Israel.

“Those demanding a ceasefire tonight will not stop at that. They will call for boycotts of Israel, an arms embargo, prosecutions of Israel in the UN.” /37

Thank you to @Tracking_Power for picking up the baton to win his Landmark employment case which now means being Anti-Zionist is considered a protected philosophical belief under the Equality Act.

"The claimant's anti-Zionist beliefs were deemed a philosophical belief and thus a protected characteristic under Section 10 of the Equality Act 2010 at the relevant times."

Furthermore, he has made significant contributions to understanding the role of Zionism in the Islamophobia industry, which unfortunately led to an attack on him by the Zionist lobby.

I highly recommend his work. /38

A minor correction for Tweet 13, I have found out the image has been doctored. Also Keir Starmer has not visited Israel since Oct 7.

Despite this, the argument remains valid regarding Starmer's connection to Israel, his endorsement by the Zionist lobby, and the image does not serve as the basis for the evidence provided.

Keir Starmer has permitted Zionist influence over UK politics and instigated the attack on Muslims in the UK. /39

This entire charade was orchestrated by the Zionist movement to safeguard their chosen leader Kier Starmer and the State of Israel.

They coerced (or threatened) the Zionist speaker into breaking convention on an SNP motion that exposed Israeli war crimes.

Subsequently, they mobilized Zionist-controlled MPs, mainstream media anchors, 'journalists', and social media influencers to shift the blame onto Muslims, aiming to demonize them.

However, their lies and propaganda have been DEBUNKED. /40