🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING: In a landmark 9-0 ruling on Wednesday that you will never hear about in the media, the US Supreme Court has undercut all DEI-based discrimination, sending the Marxists into a tizzy.
The US Supreme Court's ruling that a St. Louis police sergeant can sue over a job transfer she claims was discriminatory lays the foundation for legal action against employers who push discrimination against white people in job hiring, work assignment and promotion. That’s right, those “diversity-preferred” job postings, the practice of passing over whites for promotions, discriminatory job transfers, pushing unfair diversity trainings, etc…all of these are now legally actionable.
The ruling was championed by human rights groups as "an enormous win for workers,” but has lawyers for companies like Disney warning that it could have a chilling effect on employers' diversity initiatives.
Disney’s "Pale and Male is Stale" policy is a prime example. Disney has allegedly used it to drive out white animators by giving them the worst assignments, even though they them have the most experience, skill, and seniority, in order to make the job humiliating enough that they quit…which many of them have done.
The same companies argue that there is ‘good discrimination’ and “bad discrimination’, that white people should be purposely disadvantaged to pave the way for diversity. The lawyers stated that the decision will ‘complicate’ DEI programs and limit their ability to discriminate against white men.
The Supreme Court torpedoed these claims, re-asserting that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. Further, the court has established a relatively ‘low standard’ for bringing discrimination cases. The victim need not suffer ‘actual harm’. An employee only must show "some harm" under the terms of their employment, AND that harm need not be "material," "substantial" or "serious." The decision makes it much easier for workers to sue over discriminatory practices.
This is a big win for equality!
Read the decision on the Supreme Court site:
supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf…
Here is one of the sources used to corroborate the impacts:
acecomments.mu.nu/?post=409307
Justice Kavanaugh wrote a concurring opinion, and even stated the “some harm” requirement, though a much lower barrier to litigation, was in his opinion not required. His biew is that no harm need be proven, simply the ACT of discrimination on basis of race, color, etc is itself ‘harm’.
The road is paved for equality to once agin be restored to our struggling Marxist-controlled Republic.
Please keep this circulating to get the word out. I must turn my attention now to the next developing story. 🇺🇸💪
Patriot Roy Rogue has posted the prior decision from the appeals court, which SCOTUS has overturned. In particular, the assertion that any “materially significant harm” must be proven. By lowering the standard of proof, SCOTUS has now opened the door. 💪🇺🇸
More analysis of the decision from Dykema, specifically on how the lower standard of “some harm” was considered by the justices.
dykema.com/news-insights/…
The ruling is spreading, now published in law journals and sites. Here is analysis from Gibson Dunn.
gibsondunn.com/supreme-court-…
Another update, indicating that the ruling is expected to be applied to other federal anti-discrimination statutes.
I hope you found this report useful. I work tirelessly daily to bring news and stories that the mainstream media buries or ignores, and to include analysis and insights to help you digest it all…sometimes with the utmost seriousness, and other times with satire and humor.
I am believe DEI and Woke policies are destroying our country, the rule of law has been compromised, and a clear vision and plan for America is sorely needed. It is my conviction to stand up to tyranny and help shine a light down the road we must travel to secure our future. Thank you for your attention and support. 🙏
I am the Freedom Piper, and I work for YOU.
Would anyone like to co-host a Space on this topic, perhaps on Tuesday or Wednesday?
I’ll add another post, since there are some questions in comments about potential impact on universities. I would expect it could make passing state legislation like this example in Iowa easier.
Hosted a Space on this topic yesterday. Here is the agenda that was covered and the recording link should wirk if interested.
More positive DEI news to share:
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.