🚨🚨🚨 The United Nations 2030 Agenda Is Greatest Threat to Personal Freedoms In History. The UN General Assembly will vote on its foundation, the "Pact for the Future", in New York on Sept. 22-23.

World leaders are turning their attention to the United Nations' Project 2030, officially known as "Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development." This initiative, led by UN Secretary-General António Guterres, is framed as a response to urgent global challenges, but beneath its surface lies a clear threat to national sovereignty and personal freedoms.

At the upcoming UN General Assembly meeting, the "Pact for the Future" will be a central topic. This pact proposes a significant overhaul of global governance structures, including the establishment of a UN “Global Digital Compact.” While marketed as a means to combat poverty, inequality, and climate change, critics argue it seeks to consolidate power to regulate free speech under a centralized authority, limiting dissent and alternative viewpoints.

One of the most alarming elements is the proposed “Emergency Platform,” which would grant the UN Secretary-General unchecked authority to declare global emergencies, thus enabling one individual to wield immense power during crises—real or imagined. Additionally, Guterres emphasizes the need for centralized control for managing emerging technologies like artificial intelligence.

The discussions at the upcoming summit are less about safeguarding freedom and more about a larger agenda to centralize global authority under the guise of collaboration and security. The rhetoric echoes the unsettling notion of a future where individuals "own nothing and are happy," reminiscent of the Great Reset.

The "Global Digital Compact" outlines principles for creating a "human-centered" digital future that ostensibly respects human rights while promoting Sustainable Development Goals. However, this framework contains the mechanics for undermining personal freedoms through digital identification systems and measures to combat "disinformation." The danger lies not in the stated goals but in the broad powers these proposals grant to governments and global organizations. Moreover, the UN's push for advanced vaccine technologies and potential global vaccine passports poses a direct threat to individual autonomy, overriding rights to refuse medical interventions in favor of global governance.

The initiatives surrounding Project 2030 represent a troubling power grab disguised as a call for international cooperation. By imposing digital frameworks and restrictions under the pretext of public good, these proposals aim to dictate the flow of information and monitoring individual behavior, overridingr personal freedom in an increasingly interconnected world. Latest draft of the UN's "Pact or the Future". It includdes imposed DEI measures, restrictions for Climate Change, forced sustainability, legally binding climate courts, Mandated "culure and sport" equity programs, legislated speech and expression, centralization and oversight of global financial systems and institutions.

un-sotf.cdn.prismic.io/un-sotf/Zt8Z6h…

Reading through the replies of Ryan Routh back to Feb 2020, he appears to be a narcissist who was mobilized to action out of the Leftist rhetoric from J6. He fancied himself important but was repeatedly ignored because he appears to be a loon. After years of stalking public officials unsuccessfully, he shipped off to Ukraine and started what looks to be a mercenary booking agency. From what I can tell, it never succeeded. In April 2022, Ryan Routh says he flew to Ukraine to fight as a civilian in the conflict. His narcissism is again evident as he honestly expects Zelensky to see his post and call him to setup a tent city. He appears to be a deeply troubled person with delusions of grandeur.

‼️ The Foo Fighters seem to want forget all the licensing deals they have made and the rights they transferred when they made them. Trump does not need your permission because you already shipped your product to market, and his campaign purchased it. No take-backsies.

This is how the McCain objection was answered, as reported by the BBC in 2008:

Republican Brian Rogers said the campaign respects copyright. "Accordingly, this campaign has obtained and paid for licences from performing rights organisations, giving us permission to play millions of different songs, including My Hero."

I would suspect the same to be true now. In 2012, both BMI and ASCAP started a new type of license for political events which allows artists to disallow use.

Depending on the type of license purchased for the Arizona special guest RFK Jr's entrance, the objection of the Foo Babies may prevent future use of it.

But really, who cares...it was a single barrel buchshot with no need for a reload.

WHO IS TOBY KESSLER? Toby Shane Kessler is a 39-year-old transient and career petty criminal from San Francisco. He has a history of crimes committed across the country and has been arrested in San Francisco, Florida, and Virginia for a variety of crimes. He a product of repeated failure to adequately prosecute and incarcerate, dating back to at least 2015:

7/19/2024 - Booked in Virgina for failure to appear on a felony charge
4/29/2024 - Booked in St Augustine Florida for loitering, fraud and impersonation
5/17/2019 - Booked in Cocoa Beach, Florida for loitering & prowling
5/15/2018 - Booked in San Francisso, CA for robbery, possession and felony while on bail
2/18/2018 - Booked in San Franciso, CA for a string of jewelry store burglaries totaling over $250K
2/16/2018 - Booked in San Francisco for battery, burglary, grand theft, resisting, etc
11/24/2017 - Booked in San Francisco for threats of violence, battery on transportation personnel, concealed weapon, vandalism...
7/31/2016 - Booked in San Framcisco for exhibiting a deadly weapon, threats of violence
7/27/2016 - Booked in San Francisco for assault, battery and battery on person
10/20/2015 - Booked in San Francisco for assault and battery
4/29/2015 - Booked in San Franciso for exhibiting a deadly weapon, threats of violence
4/28/2015 - Booked in San Francisco for contempt of court
3/25/2015 - Booked in San Francisco for contempt of court
3/12/2015 - Booked in San Franciso for assault, battery
3/10/2015 - Booked in Alameda County, CA for assault, battery
2/6/2015 - Booked in Berkeley, CA for threats of violence, possessing a weapon on school grounds, exhibiting a deadly weapon

The question is, how did he come to break into the Trump / RNC HQ in Virginia? Was he hired to do the job? Was he breaking into a random building and hoping to find valuables?

thesfnews.com/toby-kessler-a…


More arrest records...

🚨🚨🚨 SUPREME COURT GIVES MIXED BAG IN TRUMP IMMUNITY RULING. In a 6-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court grappled with issues of presidential immunity and applied them to the acuusations against Trump. There is both good and bad news. Without going too deeply into the leaglese, here are the key takeaways.

First, the good news. On two counts the Court found Trump likely immune from procsecution:

➡️He has ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY from prosecution for the alleged conduct involving his communication with Justice Department officials. These charges must be dropped.

➡️He has "presumptive immunity" over his discussions and actions relating to Mike Pence, and that it is the Government’s burden to rebut the presumption of immunity in District Court.

Those two were clear cut, as they fall cleanly under Presidential Official Acts. But the remaining charges are not as cut and dry...and that brings me to the bad news...Trump is likey NOT immune from prosecution for his role in trying to change out electors, and may or may not be immune for his actions on Januray 6th:

➡️The Court was highly critical of the actions Trump took at the state level to change out electors, suggesting that these are likely PRIVATE ACTS and not official acts.

➡️The Court also addressed January 6th, criticizing the prosecution for not presenting the full context of tweets and communications.

Both of these topics were remanded to the District Court to determine which acts are official and which are not. The elector topic is the one most likely to blow up on Trump.

➡️A final topic the Court addressed is the argument Trump had made that the Impeachment Judgement Clause requires impeachment before a president may be indicted, but the Court rejected this argument.

The dissenting Justices (Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson) attempt to make the argument that former presidents should not have immunity, but they are unable to provide any "historical or textual support", instead emplying doomsday and sdistpian rhetoric to make theor points, as noted by Justice Roberts.

So, Trump has won some of the fight, but the likelihood that he is prosecuted for his role with the electors appears to be high. Here is the full text of the ruling and dissents: supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf…

🚨🚨🚨 PATH TO APPEAL. Sixteen ‘reversible errors’ from the Trump fraud trial which form the basis for appeal or Supreme Court involvement. Share and repost!!! twitchy.com/aaronwalker/20…

🚨🚨🚨 MEDIA NOT REPORTING: New evidence unsealed this week by Judge Aileen Cannon suggests Biden framed Trump in classified docs case. Thanks to @julie_kelly2 for digging into the documents and uncovering FBI testimony that the General Services Association (GSA) had been in possession of Trump's boxes in Virginia BEFORE ordering Trump's team to come get them.

And these boxes...they are supposedlly the ones that contained classified materials. That's right..they PACKED them, held them outside of DC, then DUMPED them at Mar-a-Lago and blamed Trump for stealing them as a pretence for authorizing a raid.

"It was a setup from the get-go," says Tom Fitton, the founder of Judicial Watch. The FBI agent's testimony corroborates Trump's previous assertions that the GSA had packed the boxes containing classified documents.

The "smoking gun" that Julie Kelly uncovered is but one of many documents released by Judge Cannon, which include detailed exhibits, filings and motions that point to an "intricate web of communication between the Biden White House and the National Archives and Records Administration," writes Matt Margolis, reporting for PJ Media.

We see similar communications and oversight by the White House in the Georgia Election case and the cases against Donald Trump in New York. Indeed it appears the Biden Administration has closely coordinated the various lawfare attacks on Biden's political rival. That alone is cause for grave concern.

Adding further credence to the accusations are details of Biden's Soros-funded "wargaming" in 2020 as part of the Transition Integrity Project (TIP). Reported in March of this year, the initiative involved a series of simulatatted scenarios to develop lawfare that could be used in the event of another Trump run for the presidency. Well...here we are. There appear to be a number of things pointing to collusion and conspiracy to marginalize and bury Donald Trump with engineered lawfare. I will link more details about the TIP program below.

❗️Please repost and comment to get this news out, as the mainstream media has buried the story. Details about the Soros-funded "wargames" conducted at Bill Clinton's alma mater. In addition to lawfare against Trump, the scenarios purportedly included development of approaches to actively disarm Trump supporters, denying their 2A rights.

https://x.com/FreeThinkerInc/status/1773067898476540338

🚨🚨🚨 ITS ON PURPOSE: ‘Free Palestine’ protests in a dozen U.S. cities are being funded and coordinated by Act Blue, the Democratic Party's primary fundraising platform with the intention to “deliberately disrupt and blockade economic logistical hubs and the flow of capital".

Act Blue, along with Community Justice Exchange likely have their hands in all the recent protests from bridge blocking to campus disruption and everything between.

Visit The Washington Free Beacon to read more about how these two organizations are driving social Marxism in America and channeling funding from liberal billionaires George Soros and Pierre Omidyar.

freebeacon.com/democrats/free… Adding this here

https://x.com/FreeThinkerInc/status/1783236320401166473

‼️🤬 Even more evidence of 2020 election fraud. This in addition to the fraud discovered in Georgia AND the census bureau’s admission that gross miscalculation led to 3 electoral votes and 4 years of related federal funding being ‘stolen’ from red states.

https://twitter.com/JDunlap1974/status/1782712617787654375

Electoral vote steal:

https://twitter.com/FreeThinkerInc/status/1777692793088925974

🚨🚨🚨 The Media Strikes Back: After finding out that simply ignoring the landmark 9-0 Supreme Court decision last Wednesday (that I broke here on X) would not keep the story from getting out, the mainstream media has now begun a blitz to discredit the decision as trivial and marginalize those who think and say otherwise.

The Supreme Court ruling in 𝑀𝑢𝑙𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑤 𝑣𝑠 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐶𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑡 𝐿𝑜𝑢𝑖𝑠 found that Title VII discrimination cases may be brought without having to show “significant harm”. In the unanimous decision, the justices wrote:

“The anti-discrimination provision…simply ‘seeks a workplace where individuals are not discriminated against’ because of traits like race and sex. The provision thus flatly ‘prevent[s] injury to individuals based on’ status, ibid., without distinguishing between significant and less significant harms.”

Employment law firms. legal scholars and journals have lauded the decision and published details of the ruling, along with clear and broad implications for bringing discrimination suits.

Ignoring these facts, MSN over the weekend began pushing activist disinformation stories to multiple of its media outlets, including the 𝑊𝑎𝑠ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑡𝑜𝑛 𝑃𝑜𝑠𝑡, 𝐴𝑥𝑖𝑜𝑠 and 𝐹𝑜𝑟𝑡𝑢𝑛𝑒. Their goal: to discredit the importance of the pivotal ruling. Proclaiming “DEI Lives On”, Washington Post writer Julian Mark leads the charge for the Leftist media with lopsided reporting and wishful thinking.

Mr. Mark and his peers from MSN have embarked on a ‘deny and discredit tour’, enlisting Left-wing pundits and think tanks to throw shade on the far-reaching implications of the court’s ruling, and claiming these law firms are merely “towing the line”. Quoting only DEI activists in the ACLU and DEI law firm Jenner & Block, the Washington Post presents a on-sided hack job espousing its usual level of journalistic integrity:

▶️“These scare-tactics are trying to chill employers’ commitment and investment in expanding workplace opportunity,” Ming-Qi Chu, deputy director of the ACLU’s Women’s Rights Project, said in a statement following the decision. “We won’t let them.”

▶️“This is a narrow decision, and I think for those who are watching this case closely to see how it could affect the legal landscape around DEI programs, this is not the broad decision that DEI opponents were hoping for,” said Lauren Hartz, partner at Jenner & Block and co-chair of the law firm’s DEI Protection Task Force. “I have no doubt they’ll look for ways to weaponize the decision in service of their agenda, but they’re not going to find a lot of ammunition.”

Ming-Qi Chu, writing for Fortune, does no better, claiming without any ‘receipts’ that “The Supreme Court has agreed on several occasions…that an employer can use race-conscious practices in hiring and promotion, like setting targets for representation in the workforce or in management, to correct the effects of past discrimination or eliminate manifest imbalances.”

Chu sleepwalks through the same stale “equity” arguments which have underpinned Leftist ideology and been used to justify workplace discrimination on the basis of race, gender and color for far too long, concluding that the ruling in Muldrow vs the City of St Louis will not significantly impact to DEI practices and policies. She appears not to have actually read the ruling, in which Justice Kagan states, “Today, we disapprove that approach.”

Despite these dubious and unsupported claims, Ms. Chu contradicts herself in the same breath by admitting, "Employment lawyers have closely watched the case because its impact is enormous: Workers with meritorious cases have too often been screened out by courts that set an arbitrarily high bar to bring suit, often requiring that employment actions be ‘materially’ or ‘significantly’ adverse words that are found nowhere in the text of Title VII."

Taking a page from the ‘disinformation handbook’, these liberal activist ‘reporters’ also attempt to marginalize and character assassinate those who disagree with their activist views.

Ms Chu labels opposing views as “fearmongering (that) is misguided and unjustified”. Mr Mark attempts to virtue signal by dropping Donald Trump’s name in association with those who see the ruling as significant challenge to the basis for DEI programs.

Emily Peck employs the same tactics, albeit in a subtler form, in her ‘piece’ posted on Axios where she quotes an unnamed Bloomberg source claiming, "Anti DEI groups 'will see this as an opening' to launch new attacks on diversity programs," but then admits “Still, she praised the ruling overall.”

The battle lines are drawn. This is a clear lesson in what happens when a corporation (MSN) with a vested interest is permitted to control and direct media content to fit their desired narrative. Don’t buy into the lies. Rely on independent reporting. Stay vigilant, and most of all don’t let them keep you down.

🇺🇸 I am the Freedom Piper, and I work for you. Please follow, like and repost if you value this content.

https://x.com/FreeThinkerInc/status/1781688729783988638

Here is the full text of the Supreme Court ruling: supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf…

🚨🚨🚨 UKRAINE BILL - REVELATION #1: The Ukraine Aid Bill funds immigration. You read that right. H.R.8035, the Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2024, will pay $481M for relocation and immigration of Ukrainians to the United States.

Worse, the provision puts the Director of the Office of Refugee Resettlement Robin (ORR) Dunn Marcos in charge and grants her the ability to funnel the funds back to pay for "awards previously made"...in short she can cover overspending.

Does that name ring a bell? It should...she is the one who lost 85,000 migrant children and was found "negligent" by the House Oversight Committee last year (video below). Now she will have full discretion over issuing grants and contracts with private organizations for translators, housing assistance and lawyers for Ukrainians.

So what types of grants does the ORR provide? What past "awards" could she spend this money on? Well...she runs the "unaccompanied alien children (UAC) operations", where "any UAC are apprehended by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and are subsequently transferred to the care and custody of ORR within 72 hours." 🤔

The ORR relocates these children "through its network of approximately 195 state-licensed children’s shelters." According to its own report, "In FY 2023, approximately 76% of all children referred were over 14 years of age, and 61% were boys...countries of origin of youth in this program were approximately as follows: Guatemala (42%); Honduras (28%); El Salvador (9%); Mexico (8%) and other (13%)."

There is nothing in the bill to prevent the funds from being spent to further resettlement of illegal aliens from our southern border.

So while you are already paying for illegal immigrants, you are now either also paying for mass resettlement of Ukranians, (at best), more resettlement of illegals unrelated to Ukraine, or complete misappropriation of funds (at worst). X will not allow me to post links to the ORR website where their Fact Sheets spell out the details above. Here you go, just remove the parentheses:

(https)://www.acf.hhs.gov/orr/resources

(https)://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/documents/orr/about_orr_fact_sheet.pdf

(https)://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/uac-program-fact-sheet.pdf

🚨🚨🚨CONGRESS ROBBED US BLIND: Did you know that Ukraine aid does not go to Ukraine? That's right. 75% of that $60M was never going to go to Ukraine. Let that sink in. They turned the Congress into a sea of Ukrainian flags, insisted it was the "difference between standing on the right and wrong side of history", and even had their best actor Zelensky publicly beg for it.

...𝐀𝐧𝐝 𝐚𝐥𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐢𝐥𝐞, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐞𝐲 𝐰𝐚𝐬 𝐧𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫 𝐢𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐔𝐤𝐫𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞.

Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google, who is an ardent supporter of the bill describes the plan for the money:

"𝑇ℎ𝑖𝑠 𝑤𝑒𝑒𝑘𝑒𝑛𝑑, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐻𝑜𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑤𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑣𝑜𝑡𝑒 𝑜𝑛 𝑎 𝑙𝑜𝑛𝑔-𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑚 𝑎𝑖𝑑 𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑘𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑤𝑎𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑆𝑒𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑖𝑛𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑑 $60 𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑙𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑈𝑘𝑟𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑒. 𝑴𝒐𝒔𝒕 𝒐𝒇 𝒕𝒉𝒊𝒔 𝒎𝒐𝒏𝒆𝒚 𝒘𝒊𝒍𝒍 𝒓𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝒊𝒏 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑼.𝑺., 𝒘𝒊𝒕𝒉 𝒐𝒗𝒆𝒓 𝒉𝒂𝒍𝒇 𝒈𝒐𝒊𝒏𝒈 𝒅𝒊𝒓𝒆𝒄𝒕𝒍𝒚 𝒕𝒐 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝑷𝒆𝒏𝒕𝒂𝒈𝒐𝒏 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒂𝒏𝒐𝒕𝒉𝒆𝒓 𝒒𝒖𝒂𝒓𝒕𝒆𝒓 𝒕𝒐 𝑼.𝑺. 𝒅𝒆𝒇𝒆𝒏𝒔𝒆 𝒄𝒐𝒎𝒑𝒂𝒏𝒊𝒆𝒔."

Additionally, the congress-dot-gov site states, "𝑆𝑝𝑒𝑐𝑖𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑙𝑦, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑏𝑖𝑙𝑙 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑒𝑠 𝑎𝑝𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑝𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 𝑡𝑜 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐷𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐷𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑒 (𝐷𝑂𝐷), 𝐷𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝐸𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑠𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑔𝑟𝑎𝑚𝑠, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑁𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑁𝑢𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑆𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝐴𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐴𝑑𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝐶ℎ𝑖𝑙𝑑𝑟𝑒𝑛 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝐹𝑎𝑚𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑒𝑠, 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝐷𝑒𝑝𝑎𝑟𝑡𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑒, 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑈.𝑆. 𝐴𝑔𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑦 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝐼𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝐷𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡"

So this was NEVER about aid to Ukraine....it was funneling money to our own military-industrial complex: $30B to the Pentagon, and $15B to PRIVATE COMPANIES.

Congratulations, you just sent BILLIONS of your hard-earned money to Blackrock.

🤬🤬🤬🤬🤬 I will post a series today, linked here, going deeper into the contents of the bill and the lies. THERE IS MORE. Please get the message out and stay tuned...

🚨🚨🚨 BREAKING: In a landmark 9-0 ruling on Wednesday that you will never hear about in the media, the US Supreme Court has undercut all DEI-based discrimination, sending the Marxists into a tizzy.

The US Supreme Court's ruling that a St. Louis police sergeant can sue over a job transfer she claims was discriminatory lays the foundation for legal action against employers who push discrimination against white people in job hiring, work assignment and promotion. That’s right, those “diversity-preferred” job postings, the practice of passing over whites for promotions, discriminatory job transfers, pushing unfair diversity trainings, etc…all of these are now legally actionable.

The ruling was championed by human rights groups as "an enormous win for workers,” but has lawyers for companies like Disney warning that it could have a chilling effect on employers' diversity initiatives.

Disney’s "Pale and Male is Stale" policy is a prime example. Disney has allegedly used it to drive out white animators by giving them the worst assignments, even though they them have the most experience, skill, and seniority, in order to make the job humiliating enough that they quit…which many of them have done.

The same companies argue that there is ‘good discrimination’ and “bad discrimination’, that white people should be purposely disadvantaged to pave the way for diversity. The lawyers stated that the decision will ‘complicate’ DEI programs and limit their ability to discriminate against white men.

The Supreme Court torpedoed these claims, re-asserting that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. Further, the court has established a relatively ‘low standard’ for bringing discrimination cases. The victim need not suffer ‘actual harm’. An employee only must show "some harm" under the terms of their employment, AND that harm need not be "material," "substantial" or "serious." The decision makes it much easier for workers to sue over discriminatory practices.

This is a big win for equality! Read the decision on the Supreme Court site:
supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf…