Thread by @zei_squirrel

BREAKING: New detailed report from the Times of London admits there is no evidence for the "mass rape" hoax fabricated and spread by the NYT, BBC, Guardian, AP and Reuters, and notes that Patten's own UN report confirms this and reiterates her call for an actual UN investigation

some important facts to highlight from this new report. The main claim of rape on October 7 which the NYT heavily relied on is from a deranged fantasy "testimony" by "Sapir", including cut off breasts and severed heads. The Times now confirms from Israeli police that she lied:

this piece by The Times is the first one I have seen in prestige Western media that accurately states both the highly limited nature, scope and content of Pramila Patten's UN report, which every other outlet keeps lying about, falsely saying it "confirms Hamas mass rape", and "found evidence of sexual violence/rape" by the evidentiary standard of an actual full legal investigation, both of which Patten herself confirms again are lies and falsehoods but the NYT, BBC, Reuters and AP keep repeating to launder their own "mass rape" hoax (see and ).

The AP just did this again recently in its report exposing the two Zaka hoaxers by constantly, over and over again, repeating these blatant lies about Patten's UN report "confirming Hamas mass rape" and "sexual violence/rape on October 7."

But now the Times confirms that Patten's report was not full, legal or investigative in nature, that she explicitly does not attribute any sexual violence/rape to Hamas, and that any case of sexual violence she says might have happened on October 7 is based on a low evidentiary threshold that does not meet the standard of an actual full legal investigation, and relies entirely on Israeli information and "eyewitnesses" like the aforementioned Sapir.

That is why she keeps calling for an actual investigation, which as the Times notes the Israeli regime keeps blocking.

I have been saying all this for months now (see ), and finally it has penetrated a mainstream prestige Western media outlet, confirming that all the others in the Western media and political class including the NYT, BBC and Guardian are blatant propagandist liars.

another important fact to highlight from the Times report is Israeli feminists admitting the Israeli regime has and continues to cynically weaponize the fabricated mass rape hoax to launder the ongoing Gaza genocide, and slogans like "Believe Israeli Women" are pure propaganda:

this is also the first time any prestige Western media outlet has admitted the blatantly racist nature of the mass rape hoax, although it only touches it lightly and does not go into the long history of its usage by settler-colonial powers against those they occupy and genocide:

another fact destroying the "mass rape" hoax as fabricated and laundered by the BBC in particular, in an article that remains the first result when you search for "Hamas rape". The Times now reports the person the BBC cites as a credible source, Cochav Elkayam-Levy, is a hoaxer:

again, all of this was already exposed by outlets like Mondoweiss, Electronic Intifada, Grayzone and people like myself, as we are smeared by Zionist propagandists who fabricated and spread the "mass rape" hoax. Now prestige media is starting to admit it

this is the typical cycle of genocidal atrocity propaganda by the Western media class. It's part of the propaganda system. They fabricate hoax lies, use it to justify and launder mass murder, beheadings and actual rape, then go "ok it was all bullshit":

there are countless examples of this, including with the "mass rape" atrocity propaganda hoax. The same Western media and political class scum who fabricated and spread it to launder the ongoing Gaza genocide als utilized it to destroy Libya:

The Times also confirms after themselves hiring an Israeli company to do their own investigation that there is no physical, video or photo evidence for rape on October 7. Both the German Foreign Minister and Chancellor have repeated this lie in recent days

who else made the blatantly false claim, now also debunked by The Times alongside Haaretz and the UN, that video footage of rape exists, in an article that remains published on the @guardian site to this day with no corrections? Bethan McKernan:

in line with the UN and every human rights org The Times also rejects the forced tortured "confessions" the Israeli regime put out, which Sheryl Sandberg, the Guardian's Bethan McKernan and others keep citing as "evidence" for the "mass rape" hoax:

this is also very important: The Times investigation does not mention two other crucially important facts that we know from a recent Haaretz investigation, namely that there is zero physical evidence of sexual violence/rape on any of the October 7 bodies that were brought to the Shura base for investigation by forensic pathologists, and also those found at the Nova festival.

Now this already completely destroyed the New York Times, BBC, CNN, Reuters and AP articles on the "mass rape" hoax as they all cited specifically targeted systematic sexual violence and rape on bodies which they claim they verified in photos and from witnesses at the Shura base (see and ).

They lied. They outright lied, and the AP in its recent piece debunking the two Zaka hoaxers also repeated this lie (see ).

This is why The Times piece is important, because the Haaretz piece despite including the aforementioned two important facts still desperately tries to defend the hoax by relying on falsehoods that the Times piece exposes and debunks, namely by citing the forced tortured "confessions" as evidence, by blatantly lying about the Patten report "confirming Hamas mass rape" and being a "full legal investigation" which again The Times just disproved, and also lying about both the number of "witnesses" and their credibility, including of the now exposed and debunked by The Times "Sapir".

Now all of this is of course intentional. In every piece admitting that a core element of the "mass rape" hoax was fake, they have to still cling on to another part of it. So it is up to people like me to read them all carefully and piece it together and show how despite their desperate attempts to salvage parts of the hoax, it's over. There is no thing to salvage. There is no evidence for any of it.