WHOOPS!
Secretary of State investigators and Fulton County placed all the blame to why they were short (over 17k votes) during the recount on one high-speed scanner: tabulator 816, or ICC16.
Except then-Elections Director Richard Barron said it was ICC14 that was the problem.
They can’t get their story straight.
Barron also said it was 62 batches that he claimed needed to be rescanned. The state’s cover up report says it was 97 batches. Another inconsistency.
There is no evidence any of the batches from 816 were rescanned, according to both Batches Loaded Reports.
Barron said only the first set of batches were uploaded.
Nadine Williams said the first set of batches were “erased.”
Also Nadine Williams: the second set of batches were rejected, not the first, completely contradicting herself.
Carter Jones said it was also “ICC16” that caused the problem, but the results for this tabulator never changed between the two BLRs.
They added thousands of ballots to many tabulators to make up the difference.
Tabulator 816 was untouched.
It was either ICC16 or 14, it was “zeroed out” or a “programming error,” it only accepted the first results or the first results were “erased,” it was 62 batches, or 97, all on a system that says it’s not possible to upload the same results twice without knowing it. Got it?
Or maybe it was all bull.
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.