Thread by @NikolovScience

While working on a paper using CERES satellite data, I discovered that the latest IPCC Report grossly misrepresented CERES observations of reflected solar and outgoing LW radiation.
In Chapter 7 of WG1 Contribution, Fig. 7.3 shows INVERTED trends of reflected solar & LW fluxes!

Here is a screenshot of the entire Fig. 7.3 on p. 936 of the WG1 Contribution to the IPCC AR6: ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/

Misrepresenting the CERES data in this manner implies a deliberate fraud committed by the lead authors of Chapter 7, because the trends of reflected solar and outgoing LW fluxes have been inverted via multiplying the original CERES anomalies by -1.

This cannot be accidental!

There are numerous published papers now that report the CERES-measured DECREASE of reflected solar radiation since 2000. Here are some:
-
-
-
So, the 2021 IPCC report ignored the science and misled the public! mdpi.com/2225-1154/6/3/…
mdpi.com/2073-4433/12/1…
royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rs…

What might be the IPCC's motives to invert the trends of CERES reflected SW & outgoing LW radiation? Here is a guess:
1. An increasing SW reflectance does not raise a question about the role of solar rad. in recent warming.
2. A decreasing LW trend supports GHG "heat trapping".

Just for a reference, the misrepresented CERES data appear in Chapter 7 of the IPCC AR6 WG1 Contribution: .

This Chapter has 2 Coordinating Lead Authors. The first one is Prof. Piers Forster. Here is a recent video of him:
ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/

@SankohaProjekt @areoinfo Here are some obvious reasons for falsifying the CERES data:

@MorKattens Watching this press-conference with young lead authors of the IPCC AR6, it struck me that they all feel deeply honored & flattered to "serve" an Organization, which they view almost as divine.
This mindset shuts off any critical thinking about IPCC!

@MorKattens It's the IPCC's international lure combined with a blind faith in the "scientific process" fueled by a glamorous perspective for career advancements & acquiring lots of fame that makes these young scientists lose their critical thinking once invited to join the IPCC.

Sad!!