Sean Berube Profile picture
Sharing life lessons on the True, Good and Beautiful | Helping men flourish through Faith, Fitness and Philosophy

Oct 23, 2024, 20 tweets

Few novels were quite as controversial as Dostoevsky’s The Demons

Publishers censored the story — they said it was vile and graphic

Dostoevsky said it was brutal, but necessary

Here’s what he wrote, and why it was deemed too dangerous for print…

Demons is Dostoevsky’s famous warning against nihilism

He equates nihilism to a “demon,” that drives humanity to destruction…

The story takes place in a quaint Russian village

All is peaceful to start, but after two nihilists show up, strange things begin to occur

The nihilists — Pyotr and Stavrogin — have one goal:

Create a utopian revolution

To do this, however, they believe they must destroy the “oppressive,” chains of society

This means sow chaos and disorder by any means…

Pyotr organizes a revolutionary group and tells members to commit crime:

The village gets overrun with theft and vandalism

They destroy the social order too — disrupting public events and openly mocking public officials

Distrust arises, but things are just getting started…

Their crimes ramp up in intensity:

Pyotr spreads gossip, lies, and rumors via anonymous letters in town

His group encourages public vice like drunkenness and lust

They desecrate religious icons, blackmail village members, and even plot arson

By the end of the novel, large scale atrocities take place including:

- Murder
- Multiple suicides
- Plots to attempt a mass killing

The bleak novel ends in tragedy, but sharp readers notice something missing…

The missing piece has to deal with Stavrogin

While Pyotr was a devout revolutionary, Stavrogin was not

He supported nihilism, yet didn’t fully buy into the revolution

It was as if he knew something that he wasn’t telling us. Like something was omitted...

Whereas Pyotr enjoys the chaos of nihilism, Stavrogin seems tormented by it

He clings to evil, yet is disgusted by evil, as if he has a guilty conscience

Surprisingly, though, readers never learned why Stavrogin was so tormented…

Turns out, publishers omitted an entire chapter on Stavrogin

The chapter was crucial to not just understanding him, but also the true horrors of nihilism

The chapter, however, is vile

Publishers considered it an “affront to the Russian people”

In this censored chapter, Stavrogin visits a priest and makes a confession

First, he expresses his nihilism:

“I neither know nor feel good and evil. I have not only lost any sense of it, but know that neither exist”

Nihilism has destroyed his humanity...

Stavrogin then annunciates his list of crimes

The list is long, but one crime stands out as pure abomination, even to the most staunch of nihilists…

(warning, graphic)

Stavrogin confesses to raping a child, driving her to suicide, and happily listening to her die

He says, “I liked the intoxication from the tormenting awareness of my own baseness”

It’s the ultimate act of evil, but Dostoevsky wrote this chapter for a specific reason…

Dostoevsky’s point — if you’re a nihilist, EVERYTHING is permitted…

He wants you to feel sickened, to truly stomach what a world without good and evil looks like

But Stavrogin’s confession is meant to do more than horrify us

It also reveals what nihilism does to your soul

Stavrogin's confession reveals that his crimes have destroyed his capacity to feel:

He’s numb, insomnia-driven, and hallucinates demons

The only feeling he knows is pleasure at debasing himself through evil

His nihilism is like a drug addiction…

Evil gives him pleasure, but numbs him

Growing numb, he chases greater evil for greater pleasure

He spirals and spirals until he “destroys and betrays himself for nothing”

What becomes of Stavrogin in the end? (spoilers)

In the end, Stavrogin confesses but refuses to repent

He clings to his ways, his conscience ruins him, and he commits suicide…

Now, as bleak as this story is, Dostoevsky was not a nihilist

He did not want us to abandon hope… but where is the hope in this story?

As a Christian, Dostoevsky believes anyone can find redemption

His story implies even Stavrogin, had he repented, could have redeemed himself...

Dostoevsky wants us to understand how to find redemption in a fallen world:

It begins by first recognizing good and evil

Good and evil runs through everyone — including yourself

The key, however, is not just recognizing evil, but repenting (unlike Stavrogin)

Repentance doesn’t just help you forgive yourself, but also others

It precedes patience, love, and personal redemption

The answer to the evils of nihilism, then, is humility:

To humbly recognize the good and evil inside everyone, repent, and surrender to goodness

This fear of evil, or “fear of God,” is the beginning of all wisdom:

It’s what births true hope and redemption in a fallen world…

If you enjoyed this thread:

1. repost the original tweet below
2. follow to get more threads on life's Truth, Beauty, and Goodness!

Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.

A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.

Keep scrolling