🇺🇸💰 Ever wonder why European cities accepted so many refugees?
Today, I'm over my jet lag and processing the documents I scanned this week. Already it's pretty shocking.
The refugee influx into Europe began as a U.S. taxpayer-funded subsidy. The U.S. government literally paid European cities to take them in, using Soros-backed operations like ARC (American Refugee Committee) as the middlemen.
Yes, ARC, co-founded with money from the Soros Humanitarian Fund, was running programs directly for the U.S. government.
It goes even deeper and darker than that. Stay tuned.
ARC handled all the logistical needs for IOM including deciding refugee placements and schedules, at least at one point.
Even today, there are plenty of financial incentives for European cities to take refugees. The following is a UN-backed initiative (translation: US-backed):
Good question - and I should have made it clearer. The point is that this is *where the infrastructure* for mass migration started. IOM would go onto chartering boats and such, alongside other NGOs.
I got the above file from here - I don't know why it's marked Top Secret. emergencymanual.iom.int/sites/g/files/…
It should go without saying, but it's impossible to create global operations overnight. If I handed you a billion dollars and said, "go move as many South Americans to the USA as possible," you probably wouldn't know what to do with it. Many years of collaboration, expertise, ongoing money, and setup are required.
US contributed a million towards the chartered flights of 12,000 migrants from Lebanon in 2006.
Exactly. They spent decades setting this infrastructure up, from the Bosnia conflict. But evidently not the "reverse" infrastructure. IOM's budget grew 10 times from ~280 million in 2000 to 3.4 billion in 2023, 40% of it financed by the USA.
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.