It’s 100 days since the Supreme judgment. 100 days during which @Girlguiding could have looked at their dreadful ‘inclusive’ policies and changed them.
Reader, they have not.
This thread 🧵 may distress you if you thought your daughter’s welfare and safeguarding were a priority.
1/
Their section on what the law says makes no mention of the Supreme Court judgment of 16th April.
The Equality Act is referred to, but if there is any review of policies since the judgment, it’s not apparent.
2/
girlguiding.org.uk/information-fo…
It’s hard to know where to start when it comes to their policies. Let’s start though with their approach to who can occupy a ‘woman only’ role.
Their current policy still online (link in thread) permits men to identify in.
Who can forget this particular ‘woman’?👇
3/
dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1…
If you think Girlguiding is an organisation just for girls, it is not.
They believe young boys can ‘transition’.
They need to catch up with the Cass report.
Link to policies 👇
4/ girlguiding.org.uk/information-fo…
Girlguiding is also an organisation that wants to keep secrets from parents.
Your child could be accessing opposite sex facilities. You’d never know.
5/
These secrets from parents may include sleeping arrangements on residential trips.
All geared towards ‘inclusion’ and ‘support’.
6/
Use of facilities is based on ‘gender identity’.
It’s as if the Supreme Court judgment never happened.
7/
There’s more on their website. This is a seriously captured organisation. This has completely corrupted its essential safeguarding priorities.
100 days later - there’s no sign of meaningful change.
8/8
@threadreaderapp please unroll
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.