Thread by @FinalTelegraph

Jen Psaki has ZERO credibility. Let's expose her once and for all. She is an outright horrible person by every possible standard. She's a liar, a cheat, and a coward. Here are the receipts. 🧵

The mask didn't just slip; Jen Psaki ripped it off herself. After a horrific shooting at Annunciation Catholic School in Minneapolis, her immediate, visceral reaction wasn't solace for the grieving, but sneering contempt for their faith.

Her words: “Prayer is not freaking enough... Enough with the thoughts and prayers”.  

In a moment of tragedy for a Christian community, her first instinct was to mock the very act of prayer as a useless, primitive impediment to the Left's political agenda. This is the cold, elitist heart of the modern Left laid bare.

Psaki’s anti-Christian animus isn't a personal failing; it's a reflection of official policy. Her tweet was the public relations cover for an administration that weaponizes the state against people of faith.

Consider the evidence:

The Biden DOJ launched a campaign to prosecute peaceful, pro-life Christians with federal charges and prison sentences for the crime of praying outside abortion clinics.

The Biden FBI generated an internal memo targeting "Radical-Traditionalist" Catholics as potential domestic terrorists, suggesting infiltration of their churches.

The Biden White House declared Easter Sunday, the most sacred day for Christians, as the "Transgender Day of Visibility".

Psaki’s mockery isn't an outlier. It's the party line.

How does the Left justify this persecution? By inventing a boogeyman. Psaki herself has warned of "Christian nationalist extremists". This is a deliberate, manufactured smear tactic.

Step 1: Conflate traditional Christian belief and patriotism with "extremism."
Step 2: Use this new, terrifying label to justify government surveillance and action (like the FBI memo).
Step 3: When the state then targets Christians (like pro-life grandmothers), it's no longer religious persecution—it's a "necessary" action against a supposed threat.

Psaki’s rhetoric provides the air cover for the DOJ’s ground assault on religious freedom.

For the Left, faith is not a moral code; it's a prop to be used and discarded. When EWTN's Owen Jensen asked Psaki to reconcile Biden's professed Catholic faith with his radical support for abortion, she didn't even try.

She deflected: "He believes that it's a woman's right. It's a woman's body, and it's her choice".  

When pressed on who looks out for the unborn child, she didn't offer a moral argument. She attacked the questioner with a condescending, gendered insult: "I know you've never faced those choices, nor have you ever been pregnant".

Psaki's "you've never been pregnant" retort is a masterclass in leftist debate strategy. It's the weaponization of identity to silence moral inquiry.

The tactic is simple:

A substantive question is asked about a universal moral principle (the sanctity of life).

Instead of addressing the principle, attack the identity of the questioner, claiming they lack the standing to even ask.

This reframes the debate from a philosophical one to one of identity politics, making the topic so toxic that any questioning of the progressive position is dismissed as an act of personal aggression.

It's a strategy designed to end debate, not to win it.

A legacy of lies. We now turn from character to conduct. The most revealing lie in Psaki's career is also her most monstrous. It concerns the 13 American heroes who died at Abbey Gate during Biden's catastrophic Afghanistan withdrawal.

In her 2024 book, Say More, Psaki made a definitive, written claim: President Biden "did not look at his watch" during the dignified transfer of their remains.  

This was not a misstatement. It was a cold, calculated fabrication.

The proof of Psaki's "Watch-Gate" lie is irrefutable. Gold Star families who were there testified to Biden's shocking disrespect. Mark Schmitz, father of Marine Lance Cpl. Jared Schmitz, said Biden checked his watch "every time a flag-draped casket came out of that airplane."

Photographic evidence confirms it.  

Psaki’s lie was so blatant, so disrespectful to the families of the fallen, that she was forced to admit it would be corrected in future editions of her book. She attempted to gaslight the families of dead American heroes to protect her boss. Let that sink in.

Why tell such an easily disprovable lie? Because it was a loyalty test. The image of Biden checking his watch as caskets were unloaded became a powerful symbol of his detachment and disrespect during a crisis of his own making. For a loyal operative, the mission is to erase that image from history.

By putting the lie in print, Psaki signaled her absolute, unconditional loyalty to the partisan cause, even in the face of objective reality. It was a demonstration that she is willing to say anything, no matter how monstrous, to protect the narrative. This is the ultimate qualification for a career in the Democrat-media complex.

The Great Inflation Swindle. On Nov 15, 2021, as the Biden administration pushed its multi-trillion dollar spending spree, Psaki stood at the White House podium and declared:

“No economist out there is projecting that (the Build Back Better bill) will have a negative impact on inflation”.  

This was a brazen falsehood. PolitiFact promptly rated her claim "False". Numerous economists, from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget to former Obama official Larry Summers, had warned the spending would fuel inflation.

Psaki’s "no economist" lie was the cornerstone of a deliberate campaign of economic disinformation. For months, she and the administration peddled the myth that soaring inflation was merely "temporary" and "transitory".  

This wasn't an error in forecasting. It was propaganda. They needed to pass their agenda, and admitting the truth—that flooding the economy with trillions of printed dollars would destroy purchasing power—would have killed the bill. So, Psaki's job was to lie to the American people as their savings evaporated.

The Border Shell Game. On March 18, 2021, Psaki had a rare moment of accidental honesty. She referred to the chaos at the southern border as the "crisis on the border".

A reporter, sensing the slip, asked if this represented a change in administration messaging. Psaki’s panicked retraction was telling. "Nope," she snapped, immediately reverting to the approved talking point: "challenges at the border".

This gaffe proved their refusal to use the word "crisis" was a deliberate political strategy to mislead the public about the disaster their policies had created.

Running Cover for the Biden Family. Psaki used the White House podium as a personal PR firm for the Biden family's corrupt business dealings.

When asked about the ethics of Hunter Biden selling amateur art for up to $500,000 to anonymous buyers, she peddled the absurd fantasy that "he will not know we will not know who purchases his art".

When confronted with photographic evidence of Joe Biden meeting with Hunter's foreign business associates—directly contradicting his claims—she refused to answer, instead attacking the source of the report. This is not transparency; it is a protection racket.

Psaki's defense of the Biden family connects to the Left's broader strategy: redefining "disinformation" to mean "any truth that is damaging to Democrats."

Case in point: She defended Nina Jankowicz, the proposed head of the Orwellian "Disinformation Governance Board," who had famously dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation.  

The laptop was real. The stories were true. In Psaki's world, "disinformation" is not a lie; it is an inconvenient truth that must be suppressed.

The "Circle Back" Doctrine. Jen Psaki's signature phrase, "I'll have to circle back," became a national punchline for a reason. It was not a promise to provide information. It was a condescending rhetorical weapon used to kill a line of questioning in its tracks.  

She knew exactly what she was doing. She even joked about its notoriety on "conservative Twitter" , showing her utter contempt for the idea of providing straight answers. It was evasion as an art form, a daily performance of disrespect for the press and the public.

The "circle back" was more than just evasion; it was a media conditioning tool. The strategy was subtle but effective:

A reporter asks a tough, inconvenient question.

Psaki dismisses it with "I'll circle back," providing no answer and moving on.

She rarely, if ever, actually circles back with a substantive answer in a public forum.

Over time, reporters learn that asking challenging questions is a waste of time, resulting only in this dead-end phrase. It disincentivizes real journalism and rewards compliant stenography.

The Partisan Podium: A Proven Lawbreaker. This is not an accusation. It is a legal fact. Jen Psaki violated federal law while serving as Press Secretary.

The Office of Special Counsel, after a complaint from a watchdog group, found that Psaki violated the Hatch Act by using her official, taxpayer-funded position at the White House podium to endorse a political candidate, Terry McAuliffe, in the 2021 Virginia gubernatorial election.  

She used government property and power for partisan campaigning. That is illegal.

The most telling part of Psaki's Hatch Act violation was the reaction: there was none. No meaningful consequences. The media, her future employer, largely ignored the story.

This normalizes the abuse of power. It creates a two-tiered system where laws designed to ensure a politically neutral government workforce simply do not apply to powerful Democrats. Psaki wasn't just a lawbreaker; she was a beneficiary of a corrupt system that excuses lawbreaking when it serves the correct political ends.

The Revolving Door to Propaganda. While drawing a taxpayer-funded salary, Jen Psaki was actively negotiating her future multi-million dollar employment with MSNBC.  

This is the dictionary definition of the D.C. swamp. It is a grotesque conflict of interest that taints every single press briefing she ever gave. Was she giving favorable treatment to NBC/MSNBC reporters to curry favor with her future bosses? The question answers itself.

It proves the Democratic Party and the corporate media are not separate entities. They are a single, unified political-propaganda complex.

The War on Parents. Psaki's record reveals the Left's fundamental belief that parents are an obstacle to be managed by the state.

Her administration pushed Critical Race Theory in schools via materials like the 1619 Project. When Florida passed its Parental Rights in Education law to stop sexual ideology from being taught to 5-year-olds, Psaki had an emotional meltdown, claiming leaders were taking steps to "hurt" children.  

Her allegiance is not to the family, but to the state and the political activists who control the education system.

Psaki's justification for this state-over-family worldview is the classic trick of hiding ideology behind "experts."

She once said, "I want public health officials to make decisions about how to keep my kids safe not politicians".  

This is a deceptive binary. The "public health officials" she champions are themselves deeply political actors (like teachers' union heads and partisan bureaucrats) pushing a radical leftist agenda. She dismisses the legitimate concerns of parents as mere "politics" while cloaking her own ideology in the unassailable authority of "expertise."

The Verdict of the People. After leaving the White House, Psaki cashed in on her years of deceit with a primetime show on MSNBC. The free market has delivered its verdict.

Her show, "The Briefing," has been a ratings disaster. She has lost a staggering 44% of the audience from her predecessor, Rachel Maddow.  

She even trails ratings-challenged CNN in the key 25-54 advertising demographic. While she could command a captive audience from the White House podium, American viewers are voluntarily choosing to turn her off.

Psaki's ratings collapse reveals the Propagandist's Paradox. The very traits that make someone a successful operative within the progressive bubble—absolute narrative discipline, unwavering partisanship, contempt for dissent—make them incredibly unappealing to a general audience.

They are rewarded for their loyal service with a lucrative media contract, but they lack the authenticity, charisma, or intellectual curiosity to succeed. They can only preach to the choir, and even the choir gets bored. Her failure is proof that being a good mouthpiece does not make you a good messenger.

The Anatomy of a Mouthpiece. Jen Psaki is not an anomaly. She is the quintessential product of the modern Democratic party and its media apparatus.

Her career is a case study in the moral rot of the progressive establishment—a system that rewards deceit over truth, loyalty over integrity, and ideology over decency.

From her anti-Christian sneering and her monstrous lie about fallen soldiers, to her casual lawbreaking and cashing in at the swamp's revolving door, her entire public life has been a performance of partisan hackery.

They can't win the debate on merit, so they lie. They can't persuade, so they mock. They can't lead, so they rule by "experts." Jen Psaki's career is a warning. She is the polished, smiling face of a movement that holds you, your faith, and your family in contempt.

Don't let them "circle back" into power. Demand the truth.

If you like my content please consider buying a copy of Saggezza Eterna. Read the intro free on Amazon using the link: Thanks to your support we are now Number One in new releases in our category and on the first page of "The Philosophy of Good and Evil" ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐amazon.com/dp/B0FGXMWRYP