Saggezza Eterna Profile picture
Aug 28 25 tweets 13 min read Read on X
Jen Psaki has ZERO credibility. Let's expose her once and for all. She is an outright horrible person by every possible standard. She's a liar, a cheat, and a coward. Here are the receipts. 🧵

The mask didn't just slip; Jen Psaki ripped it off herself. After a horrific shooting at Annunciation Catholic School in Minneapolis, her immediate, visceral reaction wasn't solace for the grieving, but sneering contempt for their faith.

Her words: “Prayer is not freaking enough... Enough with the thoughts and prayers”.  

In a moment of tragedy for a Christian community, her first instinct was to mock the very act of prayer as a useless, primitive impediment to the Left's political agenda. This is the cold, elitist heart of the modern Left laid bare.Image
Psaki’s anti-Christian animus isn't a personal failing; it's a reflection of official policy. Her tweet was the public relations cover for an administration that weaponizes the state against people of faith.

Consider the evidence:

The Biden DOJ launched a campaign to prosecute peaceful, pro-life Christians with federal charges and prison sentences for the crime of praying outside abortion clinics.

The Biden FBI generated an internal memo targeting "Radical-Traditionalist" Catholics as potential domestic terrorists, suggesting infiltration of their churches.

The Biden White House declared Easter Sunday, the most sacred day for Christians, as the "Transgender Day of Visibility".

Psaki’s mockery isn't an outlier. It's the party line.Image
How does the Left justify this persecution? By inventing a boogeyman. Psaki herself has warned of "Christian nationalist extremists". This is a deliberate, manufactured smear tactic.

Step 1: Conflate traditional Christian belief and patriotism with "extremism."
Step 2: Use this new, terrifying label to justify government surveillance and action (like the FBI memo).
Step 3: When the state then targets Christians (like pro-life grandmothers), it's no longer religious persecution—it's a "necessary" action against a supposed threat.

Psaki’s rhetoric provides the air cover for the DOJ’s ground assault on religious freedom.Image
For the Left, faith is not a moral code; it's a prop to be used and discarded. When EWTN's Owen Jensen asked Psaki to reconcile Biden's professed Catholic faith with his radical support for abortion, she didn't even try.

She deflected: "He believes that it's a woman's right. It's a woman's body, and it's her choice".  

When pressed on who looks out for the unborn child, she didn't offer a moral argument. She attacked the questioner with a condescending, gendered insult: "I know you've never faced those choices, nor have you ever been pregnant".Image
Psaki's "you've never been pregnant" retort is a masterclass in leftist debate strategy. It's the weaponization of identity to silence moral inquiry.

The tactic is simple:

A substantive question is asked about a universal moral principle (the sanctity of life).

Instead of addressing the principle, attack the identity of the questioner, claiming they lack the standing to even ask.

This reframes the debate from a philosophical one to one of identity politics, making the topic so toxic that any questioning of the progressive position is dismissed as an act of personal aggression.

It's a strategy designed to end debate, not to win it.Image
A legacy of lies. We now turn from character to conduct. The most revealing lie in Psaki's career is also her most monstrous. It concerns the 13 American heroes who died at Abbey Gate during Biden's catastrophic Afghanistan withdrawal.

In her 2024 book, Say More, Psaki made a definitive, written claim: President Biden "did not look at his watch" during the dignified transfer of their remains.  

This was not a misstatement. It was a cold, calculated fabrication.Image
The proof of Psaki's "Watch-Gate" lie is irrefutable. Gold Star families who were there testified to Biden's shocking disrespect. Mark Schmitz, father of Marine Lance Cpl. Jared Schmitz, said Biden checked his watch "every time a flag-draped casket came out of that airplane."

Photographic evidence confirms it.  

Psaki’s lie was so blatant, so disrespectful to the families of the fallen, that she was forced to admit it would be corrected in future editions of her book. She attempted to gaslight the families of dead American heroes to protect her boss. Let that sink in.Image
Why tell such an easily disprovable lie? Because it was a loyalty test. The image of Biden checking his watch as caskets were unloaded became a powerful symbol of his detachment and disrespect during a crisis of his own making. For a loyal operative, the mission is to erase that image from history.

By putting the lie in print, Psaki signaled her absolute, unconditional loyalty to the partisan cause, even in the face of objective reality. It was a demonstration that she is willing to say anything, no matter how monstrous, to protect the narrative. This is the ultimate qualification for a career in the Democrat-media complex.Image
The Great Inflation Swindle. On Nov 15, 2021, as the Biden administration pushed its multi-trillion dollar spending spree, Psaki stood at the White House podium and declared:

“No economist out there is projecting that (the Build Back Better bill) will have a negative impact on inflation”.  

This was a brazen falsehood. PolitiFact promptly rated her claim "False". Numerous economists, from the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget to former Obama official Larry Summers, had warned the spending would fuel inflation.Image
Psaki’s "no economist" lie was the cornerstone of a deliberate campaign of economic disinformation. For months, she and the administration peddled the myth that soaring inflation was merely "temporary" and "transitory".  

This wasn't an error in forecasting. It was propaganda. They needed to pass their agenda, and admitting the truth—that flooding the economy with trillions of printed dollars would destroy purchasing power—would have killed the bill. So, Psaki's job was to lie to the American people as their savings evaporated.Image
The Border Shell Game. On March 18, 2021, Psaki had a rare moment of accidental honesty. She referred to the chaos at the southern border as the "crisis on the border".

A reporter, sensing the slip, asked if this represented a change in administration messaging. Psaki’s panicked retraction was telling. "Nope," she snapped, immediately reverting to the approved talking point: "challenges at the border".

This gaffe proved their refusal to use the word "crisis" was a deliberate political strategy to mislead the public about the disaster their policies had created.Image
Running Cover for the Biden Family. Psaki used the White House podium as a personal PR firm for the Biden family's corrupt business dealings.

When asked about the ethics of Hunter Biden selling amateur art for up to $500,000 to anonymous buyers, she peddled the absurd fantasy that "he will not know we will not know who purchases his art".

When confronted with photographic evidence of Joe Biden meeting with Hunter's foreign business associates—directly contradicting his claims—she refused to answer, instead attacking the source of the report. This is not transparency; it is a protection racket.Image
Psaki's defense of the Biden family connects to the Left's broader strategy: redefining "disinformation" to mean "any truth that is damaging to Democrats."

Case in point: She defended Nina Jankowicz, the proposed head of the Orwellian "Disinformation Governance Board," who had famously dismissed the Hunter Biden laptop story as Russian disinformation.  

The laptop was real. The stories were true. In Psaki's world, "disinformation" is not a lie; it is an inconvenient truth that must be suppressed.Image
The "Circle Back" Doctrine. Jen Psaki's signature phrase, "I'll have to circle back," became a national punchline for a reason. It was not a promise to provide information. It was a condescending rhetorical weapon used to kill a line of questioning in its tracks.  

She knew exactly what she was doing. She even joked about its notoriety on "conservative Twitter" , showing her utter contempt for the idea of providing straight answers. It was evasion as an art form, a daily performance of disrespect for the press and the public.Image
The "circle back" was more than just evasion; it was a media conditioning tool. The strategy was subtle but effective:

A reporter asks a tough, inconvenient question.

Psaki dismisses it with "I'll circle back," providing no answer and moving on.

She rarely, if ever, actually circles back with a substantive answer in a public forum.

Over time, reporters learn that asking challenging questions is a waste of time, resulting only in this dead-end phrase. It disincentivizes real journalism and rewards compliant stenography.Image
The Partisan Podium: A Proven Lawbreaker. This is not an accusation. It is a legal fact. Jen Psaki violated federal law while serving as Press Secretary.

The Office of Special Counsel, after a complaint from a watchdog group, found that Psaki violated the Hatch Act by using her official, taxpayer-funded position at the White House podium to endorse a political candidate, Terry McAuliffe, in the 2021 Virginia gubernatorial election.  

She used government property and power for partisan campaigning. That is illegal.Image
The most telling part of Psaki's Hatch Act violation was the reaction: there was none. No meaningful consequences. The media, her future employer, largely ignored the story.

This normalizes the abuse of power. It creates a two-tiered system where laws designed to ensure a politically neutral government workforce simply do not apply to powerful Democrats. Psaki wasn't just a lawbreaker; she was a beneficiary of a corrupt system that excuses lawbreaking when it serves the correct political ends.Image
The Revolving Door to Propaganda. While drawing a taxpayer-funded salary, Jen Psaki was actively negotiating her future multi-million dollar employment with MSNBC.  

This is the dictionary definition of the D.C. swamp. It is a grotesque conflict of interest that taints every single press briefing she ever gave. Was she giving favorable treatment to NBC/MSNBC reporters to curry favor with her future bosses? The question answers itself.

It proves the Democratic Party and the corporate media are not separate entities. They are a single, unified political-propaganda complex.Image
The War on Parents. Psaki's record reveals the Left's fundamental belief that parents are an obstacle to be managed by the state.

Her administration pushed Critical Race Theory in schools via materials like the 1619 Project. When Florida passed its Parental Rights in Education law to stop sexual ideology from being taught to 5-year-olds, Psaki had an emotional meltdown, claiming leaders were taking steps to "hurt" children.  

Her allegiance is not to the family, but to the state and the political activists who control the education system.Image
Psaki's justification for this state-over-family worldview is the classic trick of hiding ideology behind "experts."

She once said, "I want public health officials to make decisions about how to keep my kids safe not politicians".  

This is a deceptive binary. The "public health officials" she champions are themselves deeply political actors (like teachers' union heads and partisan bureaucrats) pushing a radical leftist agenda. She dismisses the legitimate concerns of parents as mere "politics" while cloaking her own ideology in the unassailable authority of "expertise."Image
The Verdict of the People. After leaving the White House, Psaki cashed in on her years of deceit with a primetime show on MSNBC. The free market has delivered its verdict.

Her show, "The Briefing," has been a ratings disaster. She has lost a staggering 44% of the audience from her predecessor, Rachel Maddow.  

She even trails ratings-challenged CNN in the key 25-54 advertising demographic. While she could command a captive audience from the White House podium, American viewers are voluntarily choosing to turn her off.Image
Psaki's ratings collapse reveals the Propagandist's Paradox. The very traits that make someone a successful operative within the progressive bubble—absolute narrative discipline, unwavering partisanship, contempt for dissent—make them incredibly unappealing to a general audience.

They are rewarded for their loyal service with a lucrative media contract, but they lack the authenticity, charisma, or intellectual curiosity to succeed. They can only preach to the choir, and even the choir gets bored. Her failure is proof that being a good mouthpiece does not make you a good messenger.Image
The Anatomy of a Mouthpiece. Jen Psaki is not an anomaly. She is the quintessential product of the modern Democratic party and its media apparatus.

Her career is a case study in the moral rot of the progressive establishment—a system that rewards deceit over truth, loyalty over integrity, and ideology over decency.

From her anti-Christian sneering and her monstrous lie about fallen soldiers, to her casual lawbreaking and cashing in at the swamp's revolving door, her entire public life has been a performance of partisan hackery.Image
They can't win the debate on merit, so they lie. They can't persuade, so they mock. They can't lead, so they rule by "experts." Jen Psaki's career is a warning. She is the polished, smiling face of a movement that holds you, your faith, and your family in contempt.

Don't let them "circle back" into power. Demand the truth.Image
If you like my content please consider buying a copy of Saggezza Eterna. Read the intro free on Amazon using the link: Thanks to your support we are now Number One in new releases in our category and on the first page of "The Philosophy of Good and Evil" ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐amazon.com/dp/B0FGXMWRYP

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Saggezza Eterna

Saggezza Eterna Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @FinalTelegraph

Aug 29
Political leaders are forged in the crucible of conviction. Political products are assembled in the backrooms of a corrupt machine.

Kamala Harris is not a leader. She is a product. A perfectly focus-grouped, ideologically hollow vessel, manufactured by the D.C. establishment to acquire and maintain power.

They have sold you a narrative of a principled trailblazer. The reality is a story of ruthless opportunism.

This thread is the deconstruction of the most carefully manufactured politician of our time. Yet, a true failure. 🧵🧵Image
Today, we must conduct a political autopsy on the career of Kamala Harris, a woman the Democratic machine has anointed as its future. Her record is not one of principle, but of pure, transactional ambition. Image
Her career was not born from a grassroots movement; it was a gift from a political machine. Her rise began in the 90s, when her powerful patron, Willie Brown, appointed his then-girlfriend to two lucrative state commission posts. Her entire career is built on this foundation of elite patronage, not popular will.Image
Read 16 tweets
Aug 28
Absolutely WILD report on how fast and surely socialism KILLS.

Socialism isn't a compassionate alternative. It's a poison with a 100% fatality rate for freedom and prosperity.

They promise you a paradise, but every single time in history it has led to the same destination: poverty, tyranny, and mass graves.

This isn't a theory. It's a body count.

THREAD: The Road to Hell is Paved with Socialist Intentions.🧵Image
Part I: The Marxist Blueprint - From Socialism to Communism

The intellectual foundation of 20th-century revolutionary movements rests on the work of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, who envisioned socialism not as a final destination but as a necessary, transitional phase leading to a "higher phase of communist society". This transition is predicated on the abolition of private property and the resolution of class struggle, a process that inherently requires the concentration of immense power within a state apparatus to forcibly restructure society.  

In their foundational texts, Marx and Engels often used the terms "socialism" and "communism" interchangeably to describe their vision for a post-capitalist society. Over time, particularly by the late 19th century, "socialism" became the more common term adopted by Marxists to describe their ultimate goal. This historical context is critical, as it challenges the modern assertion that the totalitarian states of the 20th century were "communist" but not "socialist," when in fact, the architects of these systems saw the two as inextricably linked stages of a single historical process.  

The most explicit articulation of this process appears in Marx's Critique of the Gotha Programme. Here, he outlines two distinct phases of the post-capitalist world. The first is a "lower phase of communist society," which Vladimir Lenin would later popularize under the term "socialism". This socialist stage is characterized by the principle of "to each according to his contribution" and is still marked by the "birthmarks of the old society from whose womb it emerges". Following this transitional period, a "higher phase of communist society" would emerge, a utopian state operating on the principle "from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs!".  

Central to this entire project is the abolition of private ownership of the means of production, to be replaced by cooperative or public ownership. The socialist mode of production aims for "production for use"—the direct satisfaction of human needs—rather than production for profit. This requires the elimination of commodity production and the law of value that governs capitalist economies. The mechanism for achieving this is a revolutionary seizure of power by the proletariat, an event Marxists see as the inevitable result of the internal contradictions and class conflict inherent in capitalism.  

This theoretical framework, however, contains a critical flaw that enables indefinite state control. The distinction between a "lower" and "higher" phase of communism creates a permanent state of transition that provides an infinite justification for the state's power. The "higher phase" is an abstract and utopian horizon, achievable only after productive forces have massively increased and human consciousness has been fundamentally remade, such that labor becomes "life's prime want". As there are no clear metrics for achieving these conditions, a ruling party can perpetually claim that society is not yet ready for the "higher phase." The "transitional" socialist state, with its coercive powers, is thus never dismantled. The transition becomes the destination, and the promise of a future utopia becomes the rationale for a permanent dictatorship.Image
Part II: The Leninist State - Forging the "Dictatorship of the Proletariat"

It was Vladimir Lenin who translated Marx's abstract theories into a concrete and ruthless political program. In his seminal 1917 work, The State and Revolution, Lenin laid out the practical mechanics for achieving and consolidating socialist power. His framework makes clear that the "dictatorship of the proletariat" is not a benign form of workers' democracy but a centralized, violent state apparatus designed to systematically crush all opposition and enforce the transition to communism.

Citing Marx and Engels, Lenin strips the state of any pretense of being a neutral arbiter of social disputes. He defines it with stark clarity as a "special organization of force: it is an organization of violence for the suppression of some social class". In the context of the proletarian revolution, this means the state becomes a weapon wielded by the working class to suppress the now-overthrown bourgeoisie. This worldview rejects any possibility of reform or peaceful coexistence; the state is an instrument of class warfare, and its purpose is to win that war by any means necessary.  

Consequently, Lenin argues that the working class cannot simply take control of the existing "ready-made state machinery" of the bourgeois government. Instead, it must "break up, smash" it entirely. This doctrine calls for the complete destruction of existing legal, political, and social institutions to clear the way for the new socialist order. The goal of the revolution is to establish the proletariat as the new ruling class, and this new class requires its own state to "crush the resistance of the exploiters" and to organize the new economy. This is the explicit and primary function of the "dictatorship of the proletariat".  

While Lenin reiterates the Marxist belief that this new workers' state will eventually "wither away" once class distinctions are fully abolished, this is presented as a distant and almost secondary outcome. The immediate and overriding task is the violent consolidation of power. The theoretical promise of a future stateless society is used to justify the creation of the most powerful and absolute state imaginable in the present. This creates a profound and tragic paradox. The mechanism for achieving a stateless society is the total concentration of power in a new, more ruthless state. The means (totalitarianism) are in direct contradiction to the stated ends (freedom), but the utopian nature of the end is used to legitimize the brutal nature of the means. The promise of future liberty becomes the rationale for present-day tyranny.Image
Read 17 tweets
Aug 27
This is the DEEPEST most incriminating most detailed thread on George Soros you will ever read.

George Soros built an empire on chaos. Now, his son Alexander inherits the throne. But what if this 'philanthropic' empire is actually the largest, most sophisticated criminal organization in modern history? We have the evidence. We have the law. It's called RICO.

Here is the 24-part indictment the DOJ is too cowardly to bring.🧵Image
To win a RICO case, prosecutors must prove four things. First, the existence of an "Enterprise." The law's definition is brilliantly broad: it's not just a formal corporation, but ANY group of individuals with a common purpose, including a loose "association-in-fact". The Soros network—the Open Society Foundations (OSF), its legion of grantees, and its web of shell PACs—is a textbook criminal enterprise united by a single goal: the destruction of American sovereignty.Image
Second, a "Pattern of Racketeering Activity." This is the key that unlocks the entire conspiracy. The law requires at least two major crimes, or "predicate acts," from a list of 35, committed within a 10-year period. These acts must demonstrate relatedness and, crucially, "continuity"—a threat of long-term criminal conduct. The Soros Enterprise hasn't just committed two. It has engaged in a decades-long pattern of criminal activity across the globe. A dynasty of crime.Image
Read 24 tweets
Aug 27
There is a conflict brewing for the soul of the West. It is not a war against a people or a private faith, but against a political ideology that is fundamentally incompatible with our civilization.

That ideology is Political Islamism. A theocratic, absolutist system that seeks to fuse mosque and state, an ambition that is a direct threat to the foundational principles of Western liberty.

The Left, in its cowardice, refuses to name this conflict. We will not make that mistake.

This thread is a clinical examination of why theocratic Islamism and Western Civilization are irreconcilable.🧵Image
Today, we must have a conversation that our ruling class is too terrified to entertain: the foundational, philosophical clash between Western liberal democracy and the political ideology of Islamism. Image
Let's be precise. This is not a critique of the private faith of over a billion people. It is a political analysis of Islamism, a totalitarian ideology that seeks to impose a single, immutable interpretation of religious law onto the entire society. It is a political project, and it must be analyzed as such.Image
Read 17 tweets
Aug 27
From 14 Years to 6 Months: Democrat Judge Lets Serial ATM Robber of 22 Victims Walk Free — What He Did Next Is Beyond Disgusting

The first and most sacred duty of any government is to protect its citizens from predators. When the state deliberately sides with the predator, it ceases to be a government and becomes a criminal conspiracy against the people.

This is the story of their social experiment, and the innocent blood spilled to fuel it.

This thread is a warning. 🧵Image
I want you to read the name Armond Langford and burn it into your memory. This violent, repeat offender was sentenced to 14 years in prison in 2024 for robbing 22 people at ATMs. Society was safe from him. The system, for a moment, worked. Image
But the system is now run by a progressive ideology that sees criminals as victims. After just six months of a 14-year sentence, Langford was inexplicably freed by Democrat-appointed Judge Jessica Green. She did not make a mistake; she made a choice. She chose to unleash a monster back into a civilized society.Image
Read 8 tweets
Aug 26
THREAD: The UK's Suicide Pact with Globalist Chains – Why We Can't Boot Out the Rapists and Invaders

Oh, look at that – a Scottish kid goes viral for standing up to some entitled migrant thug, and suddenly the chattering classes are pretending to care about the rape gang epidemic that's been rotting Britain from the inside.

Enter MP Rupert Lowe's bombshell report, mapping out the red zones where these predators – overwhelmingly from "diverse" backgrounds – have turned our towns into hunting grounds for vulnerable girls. But don't hold your breath for deportations. The system's rigged by leftist do-gooders and internationalist elites to protect the monsters while screwing the native population. In this thread, I'll rip the mask off:

The treasonous treaties Britain shackled itself to
Why every deportation attempt gets sabotaged by woke judges and NGOs

The filthy financial kickbacks that keep the invasion profitable for the traitors in power

This isn't incompetence – it's a deliberate strategy to dilute our culture, flood our welfare state, and silence dissent. Lessons for America? Wake up before it's too late. Buckle up, patriots – the truth hurts, but it's time to fight back.Image
1/ First off, if you haven't seen Rupert Lowe's report exposing the rape gang inquiry, feast your eyes on this map of shame. Red highlights the hotspots where these gangs – let's be real, mostly Pakistani Muslim networks – operated with impunity for years, thanks to politically correct cowards in police and councils who looked the other way to avoid "racism" accusations. Thousands of white working-class girls groomed, drugged, raped, and passed around like commodities. And the perpetrators? Still here, laughing at our impotence.
2/ At the heart of this betrayal are the UNHCR's 1951 Refugee Convention and 1967 Protocol – post-WWII relics cooked up by globalist bureaucrats to virtue-signal about "human rights" while handcuffing sovereign nations. These define refugees broadly enough to include anyone claiming "persecution," but conveniently exclude war criminals only if it suits the narrative. Rights? Sure – free courts, ID papers, the works. But the real killer is non-refoulement: You can't send them back if they whine about "threats" at home. Translation: Criminals game the system, and Britain foots the bill.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(