🚨 NO SO FAST, JUDGE BULSARA!!!! Date 01/16/2026
The absurdity never ends. Democratic Judge @EDNYnews orders are legally meaningless.
District Judge Sanket J. Bulsara — appointed by @SenSchumer . 🧵 THREAD
Bulsara issued an order today. But you have NO JURISDICTION.
You recused yourself November 17, 2025.
You reassigned yourself November 26 without notice or explanation.
All orders after recusal are VOID AB INITIO.
Truth. Transparency. Justice. ⚖️
🔴 THE LEGAL REALITY:
Under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), once a judge recuses, the judge CANNOT return without:
✓ Clear articulation of reasons
✓ Notice to all parties
✓ Opportunity for parties to object
Judge Bulsara provided NONE of these.
🚨 CONSEQUENCE:
All orders issued after November 17, 2025, are VOID AB INITIO.
Liljeberg v. Health Servs. Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847 (1988).
Contreras v. Bourke, No. CV-24-0217-PR (Ariz. Aug. 21, 2025).
Today's order is VOID.
🧵 THREAD: Documents proving bias, recusal violations, unlawful injunctions, and obstruction of justice.
@SFranklmt @ladybea67 @Jenilyn67961481 @MikeYup10 @TERYDIXON @ProEthanSmith @GWash02221732 @SamAntar @CorneliaDiNunz1 @MaryWalterRadio @W4Nevada @naomirwolf @IngrahamAngle @julie_kelly2 @LoggieNY_ @Hunter_Eagleman @BrianOSheaSPI @SteveMcNY @LitaONYC @franko_ufo @SteffyAlis72269 @BirdsForLiberty @kwasny007 @DisabledOfficer @thematthew @drrodrigo23 @DosMoscas @ConservativeNY3 @imranigra @DJTNYCLUB @UnitingNYS @ClaudiaYadette1 @KevinBerge9223 @maverick2886 @MisterScarlett @Amusement2022 @WhimsyWithStyle @SoleFranco1979 @slgarelli_cnn @FrankFurter420a @BrettDoyleMCS @DeckerKell36048 @EF039229637459 @Attorney_Cox @HouseofElon @drrodrigo23 @DeckerKell36048 @RandomHvacGuy @ClaudiaYadette1
📚 WHAT DOES "VOID AB INITIO" MEAN?
VOID AB INITIO = "void from the beginning" (Latin)
It means an order, action, or decision is COMPLETELY INVALID and has ZERO LEGAL EFFECT — as if it never happened at all.
🔴 IN MY CASE:
November 17, 2025: Judge Bulsara recused himself under 28 U.S.C. § 455.
Once a judge recuses, that judge LOSES ALL AUTHORITY over the case.
November 26, 2025: Judge Bulsara reassigned himself back WITHOUT NOTICE, WITHOUT EXPLANATION, WITHOUT OPPORTUNITY TO OBJECT.
This reassignment was IMPROPER.
🚨 THE CONSEQUENCE:
Every order Judge Bulsara issued AFTER November 17 is VOID AB INITIO.
This means:
✓ The orders have ZERO legal effect
✓ They are treated as if they were NEVER issued
✓ You do NOT have to follow them
✓ They can be VACATED and ERASED from the record
✓ They CANNOT be used as a basis for any further action
📋 EXAMPLE:
If Judge Bulsara issued a filing ban on November 26 (after recusal), that filing ban is VOID AB INITIO.
It is legally meaningless.
You can FILE ANYWAY because the order that banned you has NO legal force.
🔴 WHY THIS MATTERS:
Every order Judge Bulsara issued after November 17 — the filing bans, the denials, today's order — are all VOID AB INITIO.
They are legally DEAD.
That's why we say: "THE ORDER IS VOID AND NULL."
It has NO legal standing.
Truth. Transparency. Justice. ⚖️
#VoidAbInitio #JudicialMisconduct #EDNY #DueProcessWatch
THE BIAS BEFORE RECUSAL
Before Judge Bulsara recused himself on November 17, 2025, he issued a pattern of orders showing bias:
✓ August 14, 2025 (DE [102]): Filing injunction — banned all motions without permission
✓ August 20, 2025 (DE [106]): Docket manipulation — 10-page motion docketed as 1 page
✓ September 16, 2025 (DE [114]): TOTAL BAN — blocked all filings, terminated pro se portal access
Each order violated due process, the First Amendment, and the Fifth Amendment.
Each order was issued WITHOUT NOTICE, WITHOUT HEARING, WITHOUT FINDINGS OF FACT.
This is BIAS. This is ABUSE OF POWER.
@realDonaldTrump @POTUS @SCOTUS @elonmusk @DonaldJTrumpJr @AlinaHabba @PamBondi @FBIDirectorKash @Kash_Patel @charliekirk11 @JDVance @VP @FoxNews @VigilantFox @ImMeme0 @damonimani @megynkelly @mrddmia @ReidFirm @ProjectConstitu @Article3Project @nypost @bennyjohnson @TheBabylonBee
THE RECUSAL VIOLATION
November 17, 2025: Judge Bulsara and Magistrate Judge Shields formally recused themselves under 28 U.S.C. § 455.
Cases reassigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl.
November 26, 2025: WITHOUT NOTICE. WITHOUT EXPLANATION. WITHOUT OPPORTUNITY TO OBJECT.
The cases were reassigned BACK to the same judges.
🔴 THIS VIOLATES 28 U.S.C. § 455(a).
Once a judge recuses, the judge CANNOT return without:
✓ Clear articulation of reasons
✓ Notice to all parties
✓ Opportunity for parties to object
Contreras v. Bourke, No. CV-24-0217-PR (Ariz. Aug. 21, 2025).
All orders issued AFTER November 17, 2025, are VOID AB INITIO.
Liljeberg v. Health Servs. Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847 (1988).
🚨 DEFAULT JUDGMENT IGNORED: Judges Bulsara & Shields Obstruct Justice
Multiple attorneys FAILED TO APPEAR and FAILED TO RESPOND to discovery.
🔴 DEFENDANTS' COUNSEL WHO DEFAULTED:
✓ Ginu Jacob, Esq.
✓ Sam Cohen, Esq.
✓ Joseph Mercurio, Esq.
✓ Andrew Ziemianski, Esq.
✓ Matthew Funk, Esq.
✓ Lewis Heller, Esq. (DECEASED — fraud issue)
✓ Mariana Vizuete
All represented by:
@RivkinRadler (Rivkin Radler LLP)
Counsel of Record:
✓ Jason M. Biegel
✓ David S. Wilck
🔴 WHAT HAPPENED:
I properly requested Entry of Default under Fed. R. Civ. P. 55.
Judges Bulsara and Shields IGNORED the default judgment.
They protected the law firms and their counsel.
They issued filing bans to prevent me from pursuing the default.
They concealed fraud evidence (deceased defendant still represented).
📋 THE PATTERN:
✓ Attorneys fail to appear
✓ Attorneys fail to respond
✓ I request a default judgment
✓ Judges ignore the request
✓ Judges issue filing bans to protect defendants
✓ Judges reassign themselves after recusal to continue protection
This is OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
🚨 JUDICIAL MISCONDUCT COMPLAINT FILED:
November 29, 2025 — Complaint against Judge Bulsara and Magistrate Judge Shields alleging obstruction, bias, and protection of fraudulent counsel.
Pending Mandamus: Second Circuit Cases 25-1802, 25-1808, 25-1810
#DefaultJudgment #Obstruction #JudicialMisconduct #EDNY #DueProcessWatch
Truth. Transparency. Justice. ⚖️
SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE HEARING
At the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA) questioned Judge Bulsara about his judicial record.
Sen. Kennedy confronted him about a 2020 case where:
✓ Judge Bulsara (as Magistrate Judge) made a ruling
✓ The District Court REVERSED him in part
✓ The District Court said Judge Bulsara "ignored a large collection of cases in this District"
Sen. Kennedy asked: "Your boss said you just ignored a whole line of cases. What's going on here?"
Judge Bulsara's response: He claimed he read all applicable authorities and "can expect that I did so in that one as well."
🔴 HIS OWN BOSS SAID HE IGNORED CASE LAW.
This is the same pattern we see today:
✓ Ignoring controlling law (28 U.S.C. § 455)
✓ Ignoring recusal requirements
✓ Ignoring due process
✓ Ignoring the First Amendment
Watch the full hearing: youtu.be/awC6Or6JXdY?si…
This is not a judge who respects the law.
🔴 WHAT JUDGES BULSARA & SHIELDS DID TO PROTECT THIS RICO ENTERPRISE:
They IGNORED the RICO allegations.
They PROTECTED the law firms and their counsel.
They ISSUED FILING BANS to prevent me from pursuing justice.
They CONCEALED fraud evidence.
They ALLOWED the enterprise to continue unpunished.
🚨 CONSEQUENCE:
All orders issued by Judges Bulsara and Shields AFTER November 17, 2025 (their recusal date) are VOID AND NULL.
They have NO JURISDICTION.
Their protection of this RICO Enterprise is OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.
🔴 THE REALITY:
This is not justice.
This is INJUSTICE and a mockery to The People and the System.
30+ victims remain unprotected.
A RICO Enterprise remains unpunished.
Judges who ignored it remain on the bench.
Truth. Transparency. Justice. ⚖️
#RICOEnterprise #JudicialMisconduct #Obstruction #EDNY #DueProcessWatch #30Victims
@EDNYnews @SenSchumer @threadreaderapp unroll
Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.
A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.