🚨 MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FILED
January 28, 2026 | JUDICIAL HIJACKING | DEFAULT JUDGMENT BYPASS | FRCP 55(a) VIOLATED - ADA VIOALTIONS @EDNYnews

EDNY Case 2:23-cv-06507-SJB-AYS

CORE VIOLATION: Judge Bulsara & Judge Shields were PERMANENTLY RECUSED on November 5 & 17, 2025 (DE [127]).

March 2024: Public statements by @SenJohnKennedy raised concerns regarding Judge Bulsara, which are relevant to the issues presented herein.(J. Bulsara nominated by @SenSchumer)

Yet on November 26, an unlawful ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE reassigned the case BACK to them—WITHOUT notice, WITHOUT explanation, WITHOUT opportunity to object.

🔴 THE LEGAL REALITY:
Under 28 U.S.C. § 455, recusal is PERMANENT and divests judges of ALL jurisdiction. An administrative note CANNOT override a mandatory recusal order.

🔴 CONSEQUENCE:
All post-recusal rulings are VOID AB INITIO—legally null from the moment issued.

This includes:
✓ DE [143] (Jan 16, 2026) – Dismissal
✓ Filing injunctions (Aug 14 & Sep 16, 2025)
✓ All orders after Nov 5 & 17, 2025

📋 LEGAL AUTHORITY:
• Liljeberg v. Health Servs. Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847 (1988)
• Contreras v. Bourke (Ariz. Aug. 21, 2025)
• FRCP 60(b)(4) – Void judgments must be vacated

📄 Full Motion Access: bit.ly/45EDUuG

Truth. Transparency. Justice. 🔗

@SFranklmt @ladybea67 @Jenilyn67961481 @MikeYup10 @TERYDIXON @ProEthanSmith @GWash02221732 @SamAntar @CorneliaDiNunz1 @MaryWalterRadio @W4Nevada @naomirwolf @IngrahamAngle @julie_kelly2 @LoggieNY_ @Hunter_Eagleman @BrianOSheaSPI @SteveMcNY @LitaONYC @franko_ufo @SteffyAlis72269 @BirdsForLiberty @kwasny007 @DisabledOfficer @thematthew @drrodrigo23 @DosMoscas @ConservativeNY3 @imranigra @DJTNYCLUB @UnitingNYS @ClaudiaYadette1 @KevinBerge9223 @maverick2886 @MisterScarlett @Amusement2022 @WhimsyWithStyle @SoleFranco1979 @slgarelli_cnn @FrankFurter420a @BrettDoyleMCS @DeckerKell36048 @EF039229637459 @Attorney_Cox @HouseofElon @DeckerKell36048 @RandomHvacGuy
JUDICIAL HIJACKING:

Judges Bulsara & Shields PERMANENTLY RECUSED (DE [127]) Nov 5 & 17, 2025. Unlawful admin note (Nov 26) reassigned case without notice. 28 U.S.C. § 455 is MANDATORY—admin notes cannot override recusal. All post-recusal rulings VOID AB INITIO.

RICO ENTERPRISE EXPOSED:
@WorkersLaw (Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP)
@StradleyRonon (Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young LLP)
@RivkinRadler (Rivkin Radler LLP)
@DrHochfelder + First Choice Evaluation LLC

Ignored FRCP 55(a) defaults. Law firms operate ABOVE THE LAW. #EDNY #RICOEnterprise

@realDonaldTrump @POTUS @SCOTUS @elonmusk @DonaldJTrumpJr @AlinaHabba @PamBondi @FBIDirectorKash @Kash_Patel @charliekirk11 @JDVance @VP @FoxNews @VigilantFox @ImMeme0 @damonimani @megynkelly @mrddmia @ReidFirm @ProjectConstitu @Article3Project @nypost @bennyjohnson @TheBabylonBee

youtu.be/awC6Or6JXdY?si…

🚨 NO SO FAST, JUDGE BULSARA!!!! Date 01/16/2026

The absurdity never ends. Democratic Judge @EDNYnews orders are legally meaningless.

District Judge Sanket J. Bulsara — appointed by @SenSchumer . 🧵 THREAD

Bulsara issued an order today. But you have NO JURISDICTION.

You recused yourself November 17, 2025.

You reassigned yourself November 26 without notice or explanation.

All orders after recusal are VOID AB INITIO.

Truth. Transparency. Justice. ⚖️ 🔴 THE LEGAL REALITY:

Under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a), once a judge recuses, the judge CANNOT return without:
✓ Clear articulation of reasons
✓ Notice to all parties
✓ Opportunity for parties to object

Judge Bulsara provided NONE of these.

🚨 CONSEQUENCE:

All orders issued after November 17, 2025, are VOID AB INITIO.

Liljeberg v. Health Servs. Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847 (1988).
Contreras v. Bourke, No. CV-24-0217-PR (Ariz. Aug. 21, 2025).

Today's order is VOID.

🧵 THREAD: Documents proving bias, recusal violations, unlawful injunctions, and obstruction of justice.

@SFranklmt @ladybea67 @Jenilyn67961481 @MikeYup10 @TERYDIXON @ProEthanSmith @GWash02221732 @SamAntar @CorneliaDiNunz1 @MaryWalterRadio @W4Nevada @naomirwolf @IngrahamAngle @julie_kelly2 @LoggieNY_ @Hunter_Eagleman @BrianOSheaSPI @SteveMcNY @LitaONYC @franko_ufo @SteffyAlis72269 @BirdsForLiberty @kwasny007 @DisabledOfficer @thematthew @drrodrigo23 @DosMoscas @ConservativeNY3 @imranigra @DJTNYCLUB @UnitingNYS @ClaudiaYadette1 @KevinBerge9223 @maverick2886 @MisterScarlett @Amusement2022 @WhimsyWithStyle @SoleFranco1979 @slgarelli_cnn @FrankFurter420a @BrettDoyleMCS @DeckerKell36048 @EF039229637459 @Attorney_Cox @HouseofElon @drrodrigo23 @DeckerKell36048 @RandomHvacGuy @ClaudiaYadette1

⚖️ Video Part 1: EDNY 2:20-cv-03361 | Orrego v. Knipfing et al.

📋 +250 pieces of evidence served in discovery 🎙️ Court transcripts & recordings filed 🧵

⏳ Summary Judgment PENDING (October 2025) Case proceeds on documented evidence of claims.

🔗 Access: pacer.gov (Case 2:20-cv-03361

❓ Questions, No access? lidia.orrego@justiceforlidia.nyc

#KevinJames Files THE EVIDENCE & JUDGE BROWN'S RULING ⚖️

✓ 🎙️ Return-to-Work Recording with Kevin James (Nov 6, 2018)
✓ 📝 Rebecca Uzcategui Investigation Report - Confirmed abuse & discrimination
✓ 📄 Final Assault Transcript (Oct 23, 2018)
✓ 🔍 Interview with Investigators (Nov 12, 2018)
✓ 👤 Affidavit from Manuela Orrego - Witness testimony

⏱️ TIMING SHOWS RETALIATION:
• Email complaint sent
• Suspended: less than 1 week later
• Terminated: less than 3 weeks later

Judge Brown (Sept 30, 2021): "Close timing is sufficient to suggest a causal connection."

✅ RULING: Case proceeds on documented evidence.

LAWFARE IN NY
Other victims from the system / Warriors ❤️⚖️💪 include @SFranklmt, @ladybea67, @Jenilyn67961481, @MikeYup10, @TERYDIXON, @ProEthanSmith, and @GWash02221732.

Supporters who keep sharing and following—thank you so much ❤️🙌📢: @SamAntar, @CorneliaDiNunz1, @MaryWalterRadio, @W4Nevada, @naomirwolf, @IngrahamAngle, @julie_kelly2, @LoggieNY_, @Hunter_Eagleman, @BrianOSheaSPI, @SteveMcNY, @LitaONYC, @franko_ufo, @SteffyAlis72269, @BirdsForLiberty, @kwasny007, @DisabledOfficer, @thematthew, @drrodrigo23, @DosMoscas, @ConservativeNY3, @imranigra, @DJTNYCLUB, @UnitingNYS, @ClaudiaYadette1, @KevinBerge9223, @maverick2886, @MisterScarlett, @Amusement2022, @WhimsyWithStyle, @SoleFranco1979, @slgarelli_cnn, @FrankFurter420a, @BrettDoyleMCS, @DeckerKell36048, @EF039229637459, @Attorney_Cox.

⚖️ FILED January 7, 2026 via MAIL🚨 EDNY Case 23-cv-06507: Orrego v. Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP et al.

REFILED Default Judgment Form (AO 475) November 21, 2025—MISSING from court record.

FRCP 5(d)(4): Clerk cannot refuse proper filing.

They WAIVED objection, then lied. Bad faith. ✊⚖️

Lawyers' Misrepresentation Exposed. 📋✊ 🚨 FILED VIA EMAIL DUE UNCONSTITUTIONAL INJUNCTION VIOLATION DUE PROCESS FRCP 65:

❌No Notice
❌No Hearing
❌No Evidence

FRAUD EXPOSED: #RivkinRadler Counsel falsely claimed "recently retained" but actually represented the same defendants since November 2024.

Continued representing DECEASED client Lewis Heller (died Oct 17, 2022) in State Court, October 2025. Professional misconduct. ⚖️💀

🚨 UPDATE: 12/30/2025 🧵

OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE: Direct Defiance of Appellate Court

November 21, 2025: Second Circuit Court of Appeals GRANTED my IFP motion in mandamus petition for case 20-cv-3361 (Docket 25-1802, 25-2399).

December 30, 2025: Judge Bulsara DENIES IFP in that RELATED CASE 20-cv-3361.

Direct contradiction.
Direct defiance.
This is the smoking gun.

#JusticeMatters #ObstructionOfJustice #JudicialMisconduct #DueProcess
🚨 November 21, 2025: Second Circuit Court of Appeals GRANTED my IFP motion in MANDAMUS petition for case 20-cv-3361 (Docket 25-1802, 25-2399).

The appellate court recognized what Judge Bulsara refuses to acknowledge. JUDICIAL BIAS.

🚨 BULSARA AND SHIELDS WILL IGNORE ALL THE EVIDENCE to protect @KevinJames and associates.

Mark this POST. Document the MISCONDUCT.

Watch them deny justice.

The pattern is undeniable.

#JusticeMatters #JudicialMisconduct #DueProcess

Meet Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie @EDNYAlerts

THREAD 🧵 Judicial misconduct exposed in EDNY. Our formal demand to Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie documents systematic violations in Orrego v. Kevin Knipfing AKA Kevin James et al., 20-cv-3361.

Recusal statutes ignored.

Due process denied. Read on. ⚖️
Two federal judges recused themselves under 28 U.S.C. § 455(a)—Magistrate Judges Sanket J. Bulsara and Anne Y. Shields.

Then they were REASSIGNED without explanation or party notice.
This violates federal law AND Second Circuit precedent.
How is this legal? 🚨