Thread by @GBNT1952

Today, influencers across the political spectrum like Jackson Hinkle, Nick Fuentes, Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Harry Sisson, JojoFromJerz, Aaron Rupar, Ian Carroll, and Mario Nawfal employ propaganda methods to increase their viewership and engagement reach, a thread:🧵

For a more in depth article on how they accomplish this and how they are using military doctrinal information operations, please check out my Substack below (and please Subscribe and restack to help grow my account) 👇

Propaganda has been a tool for controlling narratives and manipulating public opinion for over a century. Historical regimes like the Nazis and Soviets mastered the art through several key tactics:

Demonizing enemies, spreading disinformation, using emotional appeals like fear and outrage, and creating "us vs. them" divisions to rally support and maintain power.

The Nazis glorified Hitler as a savior figure while scapegoating Jews as existential threats to German society. They used films, posters, and mass rallies to stir hatred and normalize violence against their targets. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda minister, understood that repetition and emotional manipulation could override rational thought.

The Soviets controlled all media to repeat state approved lies until they became accepted as truth. They portrayed the West as imperial aggressors bent on destroying the worker's paradise. Dissent was crushed, and alternative narratives were systematically erased from public discourse.

These tactics work because they aren't always obvious to the people consuming them. They chip away at trust in facts and push hidden agendas through emotional manipulation and selective information. Recognizing these patterns helps you identify when you're being fed propaganda without even realizing it.

Jackson Hinkle spreads disinformation by promoting pro-Russia narratives and anti-Western conspiracies, operating like a modern Soviet propagandist who vilifies the U.S. as an imperialist threat to global stability.

He uses social media platforms to amplify false claims, such as denying documented atrocities or twisting events to fit his authoritarian worldview. This echoes the "big lie" technique where constant repetition makes falsehoods seem believable over time.

The Nazis used similar demonization tactics to portray Jews as shadowy controlling forces behind communism and capitalism simultaneously. Hinkle's repeated bans from platforms for spreading misinformation highlights how he deliberately obfuscates facts to build a loyal following.

This creates an "us vs. them" echo chamber where followers are made to feel enlightened and informed while being systematically manipulated.

Normal people might share his posts thinking they're getting "hidden truths" that mainstream media won't report, but it's classic propaganda designed to sow division and undermine democratic institutions.

Nick Fuentes employs irony and humor to spread white supremacist ideas, a tactic that mirrors Nazi propaganda's use of cartoons and satire to normalize hatred and make extremism palatable to younger audiences.

He builds cult like loyalty by appealing to grievances and victimhood, framing his followers as casualties of a "corrupt society" that has abandoned them. This parallels how the Soviets radicalized citizens through manufactured fear of capitalist enemies threatening their way of life.

Fuentes coordinates online raids and harassment campaigns to artificially amplify his messages, manipulating algorithms the same way Nazi rallies boosted regime visibility and created the illusion of mass support. His "groyper" army spreads antisemitic tropes and conspiracy theories under the guise of "America First" nationalism.

You might laugh at his memes or think it's just edgy internet humor, but these are sophisticated recruitment tools designed to desensitize people to extremism and make propaganda feel like rebellious fun rather than dangerous ideology that can radicalize vulnerable individuals.

Candace Owens promotes antisemitic conspiracies, including theories about Jewish control over media institutions and distortions of historical events. This mirrors Nazi blood libels and Holocaust denial tactics that sought to dehumanize and scapegoat entire populations.

She packages hate as "political commentary" or "asking questions," much like Soviet propaganda reframed class enemies as moral threats to society in order to justify purges and violence. Owens deliberately twists facts, such as downplaying the horrors of Nazi medical experiments, to stir outrage and build loyalty among her followers.

This emotional manipulation creates false binaries in the minds of her audience: either you agree with her "brave" truth telling or you're "brainwashed" by the establishment.

There's no room for nuance or critical thinking in this framework.

Everyday viewers might nod along to her arguments, not realizing they're consuming recycled propaganda techniques that fuel division and erode our shared understanding of reality and historical truth.

Tucker Carlson amplifies fringe conspiracy theories and Russian propaganda talking points, such as the debunked Ukrainian "biolabs" narrative, echoing Soviet era disinformation campaigns designed to undermine Western credibility and sow doubt.

He uses fear mongering about "degenerate" societies and cultural decay, similar to Nazi propaganda that portrayed designated enemies as subhuman threats to traditional values and national purity. Carlson's use of selective video clips and carefully constructed narratives manipulates emotions while boosting his ratings.

His platform gives oxygen to extremists and normalizes dangerous lies as "alternative viewpoints" that deserve equal consideration with established facts. This false equivalence is a propaganda tactic designed to muddy the waters and make truth indistinguishable from fiction.

You might tune in thinking you're getting "balance" or hearing "the other side," but it's actually a calculated strategy to make propaganda seem mainstream, reasonable, and trustworthy to audiences who would normally reject it.

Harry Sisson and JojoFromJerz use outrage driven content to attack political opponents, employing tactics similar to Soviet propaganda that labeled anyone who questioned the party line as enemies of the people deserving of public condemnation.

Sisson spreads selective misinformation on issues like immigration policy and economic data, while JojoFromJerz amplifies anti-Trump narratives with heavy doses of snark and mockery.

Both create echo chambers that mirror Nazi media's "us vs. them" mentality.

This binary thinking leaves no room for complexity: you're either with us fighting for democracy, or you're against us and complicit in fascism. The emotional manipulation stirs loyalty and tribal identity without encouraging genuine critical thinking or nuanced analysis.

Normal people might retweet their content for emotional catharsis or because it feels good to see opponents mocked, completely unaware that they're participating in propaganda tactics designed to polarize rather than inform or persuade.

Aaron Rupar clips videos out of context to mislead his audience, a disinformation tactic straight from Nazi film propaganda that edited reality to fit predetermined narratives and vilify enemies of the state.

He drives news cycles with selective edits that strip away crucial context, similar to Soviet censorship that suppressed opposition voices and manipulated footage to create false impressions of events. His clips spread rapidly across social media, shaping perception before the full truth can catch up.

This "gotcha" style amplifies division and tribal thinking, making propaganda feel like legitimate journalism or accountability. Rupar's followers consume these clips as evidence of wrongdoing without seeing the full picture or understanding what was actually said.

You might share his clips thinking they're smoking gun evidence of hypocrisy or lies, but they're carefully selected tools designed to manipulate perception and erode trust in institutions and public figures. The deception lies not in fabrication but in strategic omission.

Ian Carroll pushes conspiracies like Jewish control narratives via the Epstein case, echoing Nazi scapegoating of Jews as hidden puppet masters secretly controlling world events from the shadows.

He uses vague "research" and circumstantial connections to radicalize followers, much like Soviet appeals to class grievances that built loyalty through manufactured outrage and paranoia. Carroll's narratives blend legitimate facts with wild fiction, creating a web of paranoia that makes followers question everything except his conclusions.

This tactic makes followers feel "woke" or enlightened about hidden truths while feeding them propaganda that justifies hate and conspiracy thinking. The more layers of "evidence" he provides, the more trapped his audience becomes in a worldview where shadowy forces control everything.

What looks like investigative research is actually a radicalization pipeline that preys on people's desire to understand complex events. By offering simple explanations that blame specific groups, he provides comfort in certainty while spreading dangerous propaganda that has historically led to violence.

Mario Nawfal platforms extremists and uses bots for artificial engagement, similar to Nazi control of media outlets that manufactured mass influence and created the illusion of widespread support for regime narratives.

He spreads anti-Western propaganda and boosts authoritarian voices from around the world, echoing how Soviets used controlled interviews and staged discussions to legitimize their worldview. Nawfal's "Twitter Spaces" give a veneer of open debate while stacking the deck with voices that push specific agendas.

His brand of "citizen journalism" masks disinformation as neutral reporting or democratic discourse. The format tricks people into thinking they're hearing balanced perspectives when they're actually consuming curated propaganda.

You might tune in thinking you're getting unfiltered debate or alternative news sources, but it's a sophisticated ploy to normalize lies and divide audiences along predetermined lines. His use of engagement manipulation inflates his influence and makes fringe views seem more popular and acceptable than they actually are.

These influencers, whether left, right, or fringe, use historical propaganda playbooks to manipulate you through the same tactics that worked for the Nazis and Soviets: disinformation, fear mongering, scapegoating, and echo chambers that reinforce tribal thinking.

They thrive on outrage and emotional manipulation, making you question reality without noticing the agenda being pushed. Each post, clip, or conspiracy is designed to chip away at your ability to discern truth from fiction.

You can spot propaganda by checking multiple sources, seeking full context instead of clips, and questioning why content makes you feel angry or afraid. Ask yourself who benefits from the narrative being pushed and whether the emotional pull is clouding your judgment.

Realize this isn't just "edgy" content or alternative viewpoints worth considering. It's psychological warfare designed to control narratives, erode trust in democratic institutions, and keep you engaged through manufactured outrage.

Break free by demanding facts over feelings and refusing to be a tool for someone else's agenda. That's how we fight back against the unseen manipulation happening on your timeline every single day.

Question everything.

DOL