The main piece of information that does not fit into any plausible explanation of the Las Vegas Bombing, allegedly by Matthew Livelsberger, is this email.

Let's do a deep dive, a thread: The first and most important reason is that the bona fides used in the email are incorrect. The entire purpose of bona fides is to prove you are who you say you are, so using fake or wrong bona fides literally implies that nothing in this email can be trusted.

Matthew Livelsberger never owned a 06 Mustang, as you can see in the vehicle registration report below provided by @Landryy22.

This also coincides with source information I have received from people that knew Matt in High School and claimed his first vehicle was a 1998 Mustang, not a 2006 Mustang.

The models of these Mustangs are also entirely different, so there is no confusing them, and a person with the experience of Matt would not have messed up this very important aspect of bona fides in what is essentially his final attempt to get his story out.

🚨 WOW. 🚨

We need an immediate response from @ShawnRyan762 @samosaur @ShawnRyanShow about the veracity of these emails.

Provide all available proof, including all technical data from the emails, so we can verify its authenticity or immediately go live and redact the emails and all contents as misinformation.

Why wasn’t this done from the beginning? Here you can find the phenomenal deep dive into Matt Livelsberger done by @boneGPT

Seriously dude, amazing work.

https://twitter.com/bonegpt/status/1874691498832523429

🚨 This is the single most important piece of information in the Vegas bombing 🚨

We cannot trust any of the information contained in the emails or messages from Matt Livelsberger after December 29th when his Signal safety number was changed.

For those of you unfamiliar with Signal, it is a peer to peer encrypted messaging app that assigns you a unique safety number based off of your phone and SIM card.

It only changes if your Signal account is loaded onto a new phone or SIM.

It automatically lets everyone in conversations with you know if your safety number has changed.

Matt’s changed on the 29th.

All information sent by Matt after the 29th must be treated as misinformation. The emails to Shawn and Sam were sent on the 31st.

Why hasn’t this been addressed?
As previously addressed by @APhilosophae

https://twitter.com/aphilosophae/status/1874848350446792795

Matthew Livelsberger is a patsy, the question is for who and what purpose?

Let's break down why I think this is true by going through everything that we know so far, a thread:

https://twitter.com/GBNT1952/status/1874838796509884516

The first and most obvious reason is because the police have reported that he died from a GSW to his head 'prior' to the explosion, yet there were no reported gunshots in the 15-20 seconds before the Cybertruck exploded.

Needless to say, it is odd that one would shoot themselves in the head with a 50-caliber Desert Eagle right before blowing themselves up. It simply makes no sense.

I've seen some people saying, "maybe he did not want to burn to death so he shot himself first," but I believe that is silly. Any professional trying to carry out an actual attack would want to ensure their explosion went off without issue. They would not kill themselves before hand and take the chance of wasting the opportunity.

Also, the rifle he supposedly had in the vehicle had no iron sights nor any other optics, which basically makes it worthless for any type of engagement. Another red flag.

There is still a lot we do not know about Matthew Livelsberger, the alleged Vegas bomber, but here is what we do know and there is a lot that does not add up:

He recently made the E8 list for MSG in 2023 in an 18Z slot, which means he was a Special Forces soldier and if he pinned, would have still been on Active Duty. This also means he was well within his Team Sergeant time.

He was an 18E, Special Forces Communications Sergeant and then went to the Fox course to become an 18F, Intelligence Sergeant before making the E8 list.

He also apparently was Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (SUAS) qualified, which implies he had training as a drone pilot. I'm submitting a FOIA request for his military records, but expect that to take some time.

He rented the Cybertruck from Turo, the same company that the NOLA terrorist used. The back of the truck was full of mortar fireworks, gasoline canisters, and campfire fuel canisters, which are all combustible but would not be ideal for an explosion to create maximum damage.

Here is the crazy part, with the level of experience that he had, how does it make sense that he would rent a Cybertruck, which are known to be bulletproof, and fill it with ineffective explosives that he would know would not actually damage much, if anything?

The front windows of the building did not even break.

The other crazy part, his wife, Sara Livelsberger, has multiple anti-Trump posts on her social media from years and years ago. So, if he was radicalized, if this all was an attempt to hurt people and destroy a Trump building, why would he go about it in such an incompetent and ineffective manner?

Lots not adding up here. Will add more as information comes to light.
If you are an SF dude and knew him and have any information, feel free to DM. I understand anonymity requirements so don’t worry about that, just want to fit the pieces together to this weird puzzle.

I’m having trouble finding anyone that actually knew him, just guys that knew of him.

Let’s go through 25 erroneous claims that Democrats and MSM have made, and still make, about President Donald Trump, a thread 🧵

1. Russian Collusion

Claim: Trump colluded with Russia to interfere in the 2016 election.

Debunked By: After a lengthy investigation, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report (2019) concluded there was no sufficient evidence to prove Trump or his campaign conspired with Russia, although it highlighted Russian efforts to influence the election.

Outcome: Some Democrats maintained their stance post-Mueller, but the report’s findings did not confirm collusion as alleged. 2. Charlottesville “Fine People” Hoax

Claim: Trump referred to white supremacists as “very fine people” after the Charlottesville rally.

Debunked By: Trump’s full statement clarified he condemned white supremacists, saying, “I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally.”

Outcome: Fact-checkers and full transcripts debunked the “fine people” misinterpretation, though it remains a point of debate.

The US Department of Defense is a conglomeration of incompetence, fraud, waste, and abuse, a thread 🧵

The DoD FY 2023 Agency Financial Report is 318 pages of abject failures committed by the Department of Defense and its subsidiaries and highlights rampant inconsistencies.

Page 65, the Independent Auditor's Reports on the DoD FY 2023 and FY 2022 Financial Statements says it all.

"Our audit resulted in a disclaimer of opinion. We were unable to obtain sufficient, appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion. Accordingly, we did not express an opinion on the financial statements."

That's right, Independent Auditor's literally cannot give an opinion because there is so much missing data.
DoD Budget for FY 2023:

The DoD Budget for FY 2023 was $851.7 billion, which is about 13.6% of the U.S. Federal Budget.

Of that $851.7 billion, the report concluded that "DoD reporting entities that received disclaimers of opinion on their financial statements, when combined, account for at least 46 percent of the DoD’s total assets and at least 72 percent of the DoD’s total budgetary resources."

Yes, that means 46% of assets and 72% of total budgetary resources are either missing, inaccurate or miscalculated.

Hey @Tim_Walz, this you? Do you often wear our crest even though you were only National Guard with zero deployments, never went through SFAS or the Q course, and by all accounts never even worked with Special Forces?

Stolen valor much?





For those of you saying it’s just a hat. It is not just a hat. Anyone who has served knows that you do not wear the hat of a unit you were not a part of while you served.

You wouldn’t wear a Vietnam Veteran hat if you were not a Vietnam Veteran. This is no different.