U.S. Army Special Forces, aka Green Berets, are currently deployed in over 80 countries worldwide on a variety of missions including Unconventional Warfare, Foreign Internal Defense, Special Reconnaissance, Direct Action, Counterterrorism, Counter-proliferation of WMDs, Security Force Assistance, Information Operations, and Counterinsurgency. This is a thread breakdown of those missions 🧵: Unconventional Warfare (UW) is the cornerstone mission of Special Forces (SF). UW encompasses a broad spectrum of military and paramilitary operations conducted in an enemy held, enemy controlled, or politically sensitive denied area.

UW involves organizing, training, equipping, and directing indigenous forces to conduct guerrilla warfare, subversion, sabotage, intelligence activities, and escape and evasion operations. SF teams, operating covertly or clandestinely, aim to enable a resistance movement or insurgency to coerce, disrupt, or overthrow a government or occupying power.

This complex mission requires SF operators to possess deep cultural understanding, language skills, and the ability to build rapport with local populations. UW operations can span months or even years, involving tasks such as establishing and operating clandestine support mechanisms, conducting psychological operations to influence target audiences, and linking indigenous forces with conventional forces.

The ultimate goal of UW is to exploit a hostile power's political, military, economic, and psychological vulnerabilities. This involves developing and sustaining resistance organizations and synchronizing their activities to further U.S. national objectives. Such missions demand exceptional adaptability, as SF teams often operate with minimal support in austere environments, balancing tactical requirements with strategic and political considerations.

We have been lied to about the 2017 Las Vegas mass shooting event that claimed 60 lives and injured over 850 more, a thread 🧵: Since the 2017 Las Vegas shooting, numerous discrepancies and inconsistencies have been identified by multiple researchers. The media and authorities have maintained that these claims lack substantial evidence, but this thread will show the evidence gathered by independent researchers that proves, without a shadow of a doubt, that Stephen Paddock was framed for this mass casualty event.

At the end of this thread, I will post links to any and all information used from outside sources for your own verification processes.

Before we start, I want to give a shout out to @xanderarena for his work on this case. He definitely did the heavy lifting and has thoroughly investigated this incident far better than anyone else has. I'd also like to shout out to @ClaytonMorris and @TheRedactedInc for producing the video breaking down this incident alongside Xander.

Great work gentlemen.

Let's jump in and break down the reasons why I think that almost everything that they told us was a lie.

Trump's new Executive Order declaring certain cartels and criminal organizations as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO) is absolutely necessary but also poses numerous complex and formidable challenges for the U.S. military, diplomatic, Federal Law Enforcement and intelligence communities, a thread 🧵:


The best way to tackle this problem is to treat it as any planning cell would and go through a full Mission Analysis. I will finish the thread with a breakdown of everything contained in the Mission Analysis, but I will forego COA Development as I do believe some information should be left off of open source.

Before we start, I would like to reaffirm that everything in this thread is Open-Source information that I was able to gather from the internet. I truly want to iterate how complex this fight will actually be by looking critically at what planning will look like for this type of mission, but you must understand that this information was already out there for anyone to access.

This thread is obviously a very condensed, limited view of what planning would look like for this mission and does not include any actual intelligence or information that would be available to an active planning cell in an ISOFAC.

Let's begin.

Almost no one is reporting that the pilot of the Black Hawk, identified as Chief Warrant Officer 2 (CW2) Jo Ellis, was a transgender woman with many anti Trump posts. He transitioned at some point while serving as a pilot. Yes, they allowed a person with a severe mental disorder to have control of the most used aircraft platform in the Army. This is Biden's military...

I will also post a video from another angle showing how long the Black Hawk had to divert or change course from the incoming passenger jet directly under this.

Was this another instance of transgender terrorism? #transterrorism Here is another video of the crash and you can see the direct path and the 30 full seconds of awareness the Black Hawk would have had to see this incoming passenger jet.

DEI entered the US Army's Special Forces, or Green Berets, nearly a decade ago. Is any organization safe?

"Our Regiment has a cancer, and it is destroying the SF legacy, its capability, and its credibility."

How DEI is ruining Special Forces, a thread: The "Night Letter," a term coined by those in the regiment at the time, is a scathing account from several Active Duty Green Berets who served as Cadre in the Special Forces Qualification Course (SFQC) during the time troubling changes were implemented. It details how higher leadership forcibly lowered standards across multiple phases of the SFQC to increase numbers and to facilitate the entry of the first "Female Green Beret."

The letter includes dates and receipts documenting instances when standards were either completely ignored or altered to boost numbers. It also highlights the efforts to pave the way for women to join the SF ranks. Additionally, it provides evidence of students being advanced to the next phase of training despite failing or quitting. with troubling claims of nepotism and favoritism on display.

Why has this story about the NOLA Terrorist Attack all but disappeared from the media cycle? Why have people stopped asking questions?

I have a few more, a follow up thread:

https://x.com/GBNT1952/status/1879571765393006966

1) How did Jabbar get ahold of RDX or R-Salt, as both are highly regulated explosive compounds and obtaining either as a civilian would be both illegal and highly difficult?

In the deep dive thread, I go into the specifics of RDX and R-Salt, but the question that has not been answered is how he was able to obtain either of these compounds. Again, RDX is used in C4 explosives which is used by the military. You cannot just purchase either of these compounds openly in the US, meaning illegally acquiring them is the only way to obtain them.

The FBI, Homeland, and AFT are obviously on the lookout for anything related to these compounds, so how did he get them without raising any red flags?

He did not fly with them, that's for sure. Airports utilize multiple layers of security and detection methods that are specifically designed to identify explosive materials, and he would not have risked getting caught flying with these, so him acquiring them in the visit to Egypt is likely out. These methods include:

1 - Explosive Trace Detection (ETD): These highly sensitive devices can detect nanogram-level traces of explosives like RDX on luggage, clothing, or hands. ETD swabs are commonly used during secondary screenings.

2 - Advanced Imaging Technology: Full-body scanners can detect anomalies or hidden objects on passengers.

3 - X-ray Screening: Checked and carry-on luggage is screened using advanced X-ray systems capable of identifying suspicious materials.

4 - Canine Teams: Many people think the dogs in airports are looking for drugs, but I can assure you they are not. These canines are explosive detection canines, and they are trained to sniff out a wide range of explosive compounds.

5 - Mass Spectrometry: Some airports are implementing more advanced spectrometry techniques that can rapidly detect explosive residues on surfaces.

If explosives are detected at an airport the perpetrator will immediately be apprehended, and the entire airport goes into lockdown while the threat is analyzed. This would obviously put a damper on any future plans.

There is the small chance that he could have created his own R-Salt, if that was indeed the explosive agent used, but the synthesization process for this is incredibly complex and volatile, meaning he would have had to have a chemical level breakdown of how to do it without blowing himself up in the process. Highly unlikely.

I am convinced he acquired whatever bomb making material he used in the United States from a contact that has access to such materials.

The main piece of information that does not fit into any plausible explanation of the Las Vegas Bombing, allegedly by Matthew Livelsberger, is this email.

Let's do a deep dive, a thread: The first and most important reason is that the bona fides used in the email are incorrect. The entire purpose of bona fides is to prove you are who you say you are, so using fake or wrong bona fides literally implies that nothing in this email can be trusted.

Matthew Livelsberger never owned a 06 Mustang, as you can see in the vehicle registration report below provided by @Landryy22.

This also coincides with source information I have received from people that knew Matt in High School and claimed his first vehicle was a 1998 Mustang, not a 2006 Mustang.

The models of these Mustangs are also entirely different, so there is no confusing them, and a person with the experience of Matt would not have messed up this very important aspect of bona fides in what is essentially his final attempt to get his story out.

🚨 WOW. 🚨

We need an immediate response from @ShawnRyan762 @samosaur @ShawnRyanShow about the veracity of these emails.

Provide all available proof, including all technical data from the emails, so we can verify its authenticity or immediately go live and redact the emails and all contents as misinformation.

Why wasn’t this done from the beginning? Here you can find the phenomenal deep dive into Matt Livelsberger done by @boneGPT

Seriously dude, amazing work.

https://twitter.com/bonegpt/status/1874691498832523429

🚨 This is the single most important piece of information in the Vegas bombing 🚨

We cannot trust any of the information contained in the emails or messages from Matt Livelsberger after December 29th when his Signal safety number was changed.

For those of you unfamiliar with Signal, it is a peer to peer encrypted messaging app that assigns you a unique safety number based off of your phone and SIM card.

It only changes if your Signal account is loaded onto a new phone or SIM.

It automatically lets everyone in conversations with you know if your safety number has changed.

Matt’s changed on the 29th.

All information sent by Matt after the 29th must be treated as misinformation. The emails to Shawn and Sam were sent on the 31st.

Why hasn’t this been addressed?
As previously addressed by @APhilosophae

https://twitter.com/aphilosophae/status/1874848350446792795

Matthew Livelsberger is a patsy, the question is for who and what purpose?

Let's break down why I think this is true by going through everything that we know so far, a thread:

https://twitter.com/GBNT1952/status/1874838796509884516

The first and most obvious reason is because the police have reported that he died from a GSW to his head 'prior' to the explosion, yet there were no reported gunshots in the 15-20 seconds before the Cybertruck exploded.

Needless to say, it is odd that one would shoot themselves in the head with a 50-caliber Desert Eagle right before blowing themselves up. It simply makes no sense.

I've seen some people saying, "maybe he did not want to burn to death so he shot himself first," but I believe that is silly. Any professional trying to carry out an actual attack would want to ensure their explosion went off without issue. They would not kill themselves before hand and take the chance of wasting the opportunity.

Also, the rifle he supposedly had in the vehicle had no iron sights nor any other optics, which basically makes it worthless for any type of engagement. Another red flag.

There is still a lot we do not know about Matthew Livelsberger, the alleged Vegas bomber, but here is what we do know and there is a lot that does not add up:

He recently made the E8 list for MSG in 2023 in an 18Z slot, which means he was a Special Forces soldier and if he pinned, would have still been on Active Duty. This also means he was well within his Team Sergeant time.

He was an 18E, Special Forces Communications Sergeant and then went to the Fox course to become an 18F, Intelligence Sergeant before making the E8 list.

He also apparently was Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems (SUAS) qualified, which implies he had training as a drone pilot. I'm submitting a FOIA request for his military records, but expect that to take some time.

He rented the Cybertruck from Turo, the same company that the NOLA terrorist used. The back of the truck was full of mortar fireworks, gasoline canisters, and campfire fuel canisters, which are all combustible but would not be ideal for an explosion to create maximum damage.

Here is the crazy part, with the level of experience that he had, how does it make sense that he would rent a Cybertruck, which are known to be bulletproof, and fill it with ineffective explosives that he would know would not actually damage much, if anything?

The front windows of the building did not even break.

The other crazy part, his wife, Sara Livelsberger, has multiple anti-Trump posts on her social media from years and years ago. So, if he was radicalized, if this all was an attempt to hurt people and destroy a Trump building, why would he go about it in such an incompetent and ineffective manner?

Lots not adding up here. Will add more as information comes to light.
If you are an SF dude and knew him and have any information, feel free to DM. I understand anonymity requirements so don’t worry about that, just want to fit the pieces together to this weird puzzle.

I’m having trouble finding anyone that actually knew him, just guys that knew of him.

Let’s go through 25 erroneous claims that Democrats and MSM have made, and still make, about President Donald Trump, a thread 🧵

1. Russian Collusion

Claim: Trump colluded with Russia to interfere in the 2016 election.

Debunked By: After a lengthy investigation, Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report (2019) concluded there was no sufficient evidence to prove Trump or his campaign conspired with Russia, although it highlighted Russian efforts to influence the election.

Outcome: Some Democrats maintained their stance post-Mueller, but the report’s findings did not confirm collusion as alleged. 2. Charlottesville “Fine People” Hoax

Claim: Trump referred to white supremacists as “very fine people” after the Charlottesville rally.

Debunked By: Trump’s full statement clarified he condemned white supremacists, saying, “I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists, because they should be condemned totally.”

Outcome: Fact-checkers and full transcripts debunked the “fine people” misinterpretation, though it remains a point of debate.

The US Department of Defense is a conglomeration of incompetence, fraud, waste, and abuse, a thread 🧵

The DoD FY 2023 Agency Financial Report is 318 pages of abject failures committed by the Department of Defense and its subsidiaries and highlights rampant inconsistencies.

Page 65, the Independent Auditor's Reports on the DoD FY 2023 and FY 2022 Financial Statements says it all.

"Our audit resulted in a disclaimer of opinion. We were unable to obtain sufficient, appropriate audit evidence to provide a basis for an audit opinion. Accordingly, we did not express an opinion on the financial statements."

That's right, Independent Auditor's literally cannot give an opinion because there is so much missing data.
DoD Budget for FY 2023:

The DoD Budget for FY 2023 was $851.7 billion, which is about 13.6% of the U.S. Federal Budget.

Of that $851.7 billion, the report concluded that "DoD reporting entities that received disclaimers of opinion on their financial statements, when combined, account for at least 46 percent of the DoD’s total assets and at least 72 percent of the DoD’s total budgetary resources."

Yes, that means 46% of assets and 72% of total budgetary resources are either missing, inaccurate or miscalculated.

Hey @Tim_Walz, this you? Do you often wear our crest even though you were only National Guard with zero deployments, never went through SFAS or the Q course, and by all accounts never even worked with Special Forces?

Stolen valor much?





For those of you saying it’s just a hat. It is not just a hat. Anyone who has served knows that you do not wear the hat of a unit you were not a part of while you served.

You wouldn’t wear a Vietnam Veteran hat if you were not a Vietnam Veteran. This is no different.