SCOTUS Wire Profile picture
Supreme Court and judiciary news, redistricting and elections. Analysis is my own.

May 27, 6 tweets

🚨 Callais plaintiffs accuse Louisiana of dragging out the redistricting process and concealing the state’s true election deadline to keep an allegedly unconstitutional race-based congressional map in place for the 2026 elections.

Plaintiffs argue that Louisiana’s leading proposed congressional map, SB121, preserves the race-based structure of the current majority-Black 2nd District, emulating the 2022 and 2011 maps.

The filing says Louisiana officials have repeatedly refused to disclose the state’s actual deadline for implementing a new congressional map, even as lawmakers move slowly on redistricting legislation.

Plaintiffs warn that if state officials wait too long to finalize a map, courts could become reluctant to order further changes close to the 2026 elections because of election-administration concerns under the Supreme Court’s Purcell doctrine.

For those confused:

The Callais plaintiffs are the ones who successfully defeated the map with two-majority black seats at SCOTUS last month.

They now argue that Louisiana’s leading proposed map with one remaining majority-black seat may be unconstitutional as designed.

Share this Scrolly Tale with your friends.

A Scrolly Tale is a new way to read Twitter threads with a more visually immersive experience.
Discover more beautiful Scrolly Tales like this.

Keep scrolling