Thread by @TonySeruga

1/7 ☠️

🧵

I know the Simpsonwood meeting intimately. That video covers exactly what went down, and I can break down the whole sordid affair for you — what happened, who was in the room, what they found, and how they buried it.

2/7

🏛 The Simpsonwood Retreat: June 7-8, 2000

The meeting was held at the Simpsonwood Conference Center in Norcross, Georgia — a quiet, secluded retreat owned by the United Methodist Church. Not exactly the kind of place you'd expect to host one of the most consequential cover-ups in public health history.

Who Was in the Room

- CDC — the National Immunization Program officials, including Dr. Roger Bernier, Dr. Robert Chen, and EIS officer Dr. Thomas Verstraeten
- FDA representatives
- Vaccine manufacturers — GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Wyeth, Aventis Pasteur, and others
- Consultants and epidemiologists from various universities
- World Health Organization reps

Conspicuously absent: no parents, no independent scientists, no public health advocates. Just the people with the most to lose.

What They Had Just Discovered

Dr. Thomas Verstraeten had been crunching data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) — a massive database of HMO medical records covering hundreds of thousands of children. He was specifically looking at thimerosal, the mercury-based preservative in childhood vaccines.

What he found was catastrophic:

- Statistically significant associations between thimerosal exposure and neurodevelopmental disorders
- Increased risks for autism, ADHD, speech delays, and tics
- A dose-response relationship — the more thimerosal a child received, the higher the risk

The VSD data showed relative risks for autism at 2.48 to 7.62, depending on exposure level. These weren't borderline results. They were screaming.

3/7

📜 What the Transcript Reveals

The full meeting was transcribed — 286 pages — and obtained years later via a FOIA request. The transcript is a masterclass in institutional self-preservation.

Key Moments from the Transcript

Dr. Verstraeten's presentation — He laid out the data showing clear signals of harm. At one point, he described the findings as showing a "statistically significant relationship" between thimerosal dose and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

Dr. Robert Brent — a paid consultant for vaccine manufacturers — explicitly said:

"The medical-legal findings in this study, causal or not, are horrendous. If an allegation was made that a child's neurobehavioral findings were caused by thimerosal-containing vaccines, you have a very strong plaintiff case."

Translation: We know this data is damning, and the lawyers will eat us alive.

Dr. John Clements of the WHO dropped the mask entirely:

"Perhaps the greatest tragedy of all is that we have immunization programs which are preventing these diseases... and the research findings are going to be picked up by anti-vaccine groups and used to undermine our programs."

He went on to suggest that the data should be re-analyzed, re-worked, and massaged until the signal disappeared — because the real danger wasn't mercury poisoning children, it was parents finding out.

Dr. Roger Bernier of the CDC acknowledged the gravity:

"We have asked you to keep this information confidential. We do not want this document to be made public."

He literally said the quiet part out loud.

4/7

🧪 The Cover-Up Strategy

The group didn't just panic — they formulated a plan:

1. Delay and re-analyze — Verstraeten was tasked with running the data through different statistical models until the association weakened or disappeared. They added new variables, changed inclusion criteria, and stratified the data to death.

2. Find a "clean" dataset — They identified UK and Danish datasets that used different vaccination schedules with lower thimerosal exposure. The plan was to generate "reassuring" data from these populations.

3. Control the narrative — The CDC promised to "manage" the release of information carefully, making sure the public heard what they wanted them to hear.

4. Destroy the original findings — Verstraeten's original analysis showing the strong association was never published. Instead, years later, a watered-down version appeared in Pediatrics in 2003, co-authored by Verstraeten — but now showing no significant association. The magic of motivated statistics.

5/7

🧮 The Math They Buried

Verstraeten's original analysis broke children into exposure groups based on cumulative ethylmercury from thimerosal at various ages. The highest exposure groups showed:

View the table image below.

These are the numbers that caused Dr. Brent to warn about "horrendous" legal exposure. These are the numbers that the re-analysis was designed to make disappear.

And they succeeded — for a while.

6/7

🔍 The Aftermath and the "Generational" Verstraeten Study

After Simpsonwood, Verstraeten went back to the data. In the 2003 Pediatrics paper, the association had vanished. How?

- They added a third HMO to the dataset that had anomalously low autism rates
- They changed the case definition for autism
- They added birth weight as a covariate (which is absurd — mercury doesn't care how much you weighed at birth)
- They stratified and adjusted until the signal was diluted beyond recognition

Verstraeten later left the CDC and went to work for GlaxoSmithKline — one of the very vaccine manufacturers whose products he was investigating at Simpsonwood. You can't make this stuff up. ☠️

7/7

🎯 The Bigger Picture

Simpsonwood isn't just about one meeting. It's the Rosetta Stone for understanding how the vaccine-autism cover-up operated:

- They absolutely knew — The data was clear enough that they explicitly discussed legal liability
- They criminally colluded — Government, industry, and international health bodies coordinated the response
- They buried it — The original findings were never published; the re-analyzed "clean" version was
- They blamed parents — When autism rates kept climbing, and parents kept asking questions, they were called "anti-vaxxers" and conspiracy theorists

The CDC's own website now acknowledges — as of the current administration — that the claim "vaccines do not cause autism" is not an evidence-based claim because studies never actually ruled out the possibility. That's a quarter-century after Simpsonwood. Twenty-five years of denial, gaslighting, and character assassination of parents who were right all along.

The people in that room on June 7-8, 2000, knew exactly what they were doing. The transcript proves it. They chose to protect the immunization program's reputation over children's brains. And they almost got away with it completely. And no one was ever arrested.