Tony Seruga Profile picture
Big Data Pioneer | Intel Ops | Think Tank for Hire | Enterprise AI Implementor | AI M&A | Healthcare M&A | Space Warfare M&A | CIA/NSA Contractor/Whistleblower
Jun 22 6 tweets 5 min read
1/6 🧵

This is the same playbook as the Southern Poverty Law Center grift, just with a corrupt California state government veneer instead of a direct-mail fundraising operation.

🕵️ The Human Rights Coalition of San Bernardino County: Follow the Money

🏛️ What It Actually Is

The Human Rights Coalition of San Bernardino County (HRC-SBC) is a brand-new nonprofit launched through the Family Assistance Program, a High Desert-based outfit that historically dealt with domestic violence victims.

The coalition’s origin story is built around the August 2023 killing of shop owner Laura Ann “Lauri” Carleton — shot dead after a dispute over a pride flag outside her Cedar Glen clothing store near Lake Arrowhead. That tragedy became the emotional anchor for this whole multi-million dollar operation.

The coalition’s public-facing product is a digital “Hate Crime & Bias Incident Rapid Reporting Tool” — a confidential, anonymous reporting system that deliberately routes around law enforcement. Reports don’t trigger police involvement. The pitch? “Underreporting is the real crisis.” They’re recruiting nonprofits, faith leaders, legal aid groups, mental health providers, and immigration advocates to form something called the Community Review & Response Network (CRRN). September 2026 is the target launch.

Key players:

- Caitlyn Kautzman — Coalition Coordinator, also a manager at Family Assistance Program

- Kevin Kish — Director of the California Civil Rights Department, providing state-level cheerleading

- Bolas (first name not given in reporting) — appears to be part of leadership at the Family Assistance ProgramImage 2/6

💰 The Money Trail

Here’s where it gets interesting. The coalition receives grant money from the California Department of Social Services’ Stop the Hate program.

The Stop the Hate (STH) program is authorized under California Government Code § 8260 and administered by CDSS in consultation with the Commission on Asian and Pacific Islander American Affairs. The scale is absolutely staggering:

View the image below.

That’s over $136 million in total taxpayer money funneled into the hate-incident industrial complex in just a few years. And these grants aren’t one-and-done — organizations can renew. The HRC-SBC is one of those 173 organizations in the massive Round 2 funding pool.

The CDSS set up a structure where “Regional Leads” sub-grant STH funds to “Program Service Providers.” It’s a layered funding waterfall — state to regional intermediaries to local operators — exactly the kind of structure that makes following every dollar nearly impossible for the average citizen.Image
Jun 22 8 tweets 5 min read
1/6 🧵

📡 The Invisible Exhaust You’re Leaving Everywhere

This barely registers in public discourse, but in practical terms, it is one of the most comprehensive surveillance systems ever built — and it wasn’t built by fiat. It accreted. One Bluetooth earbud at a time, one key fob, one “smart” appliance, until the ambient radio landscape around every person became a unique identifier more reliable than a face.

Let me walk through the layers here, because the implications are worse than most people grasp.Image 2/6

🔵 The Protocol-Level Problem

Your phone’s privacy controls are genuinely meaningful — randomized MAC addresses, permission dialogs, VPNs, airplane mode that actually works. But here’s the asymmetry:

View the image below.

The phone is the exception, not the rule. Everything else in your personal RF cloud is screaming a persistent identifier into the void hundreds of times per minute, and most of those identifiers never rotate.

A pair of AirPods will broadcast the same Bluetooth MAC address for its entire operational life — years. That fitness band on your wrist? Same story.

BLE advertising packets are the worst offenders. They’re designed to continuously announce their presence so your phone can find them. They literally can’t be turned off without disabling the device’s core function. And they contain enough unique information that even if one identifier rotates, the combination of signals — device type, manufacturer code, signal strength pattern, temporal rhythm — forms a fingerprint.Image
Jun 20 10 tweets 5 min read
1/10 🧵

🎓 The Department of Education: A 50-Year Controlled Experiment That Cost $4 Trillion and Produced Nothing

Let me walk through this indictment with the precision it deserves, because the argument here isn’t speculative—it’s arithmetic. And the arithmetic is devastating.Image 2/10

🧪 The Experiment Design

The setup is what a social scientist dreams of and almost never gets:

View the image in the previous post.

That’s the whole case. Not a think-tank critique. Not a partisan hit job. The government’s own data collectors ran the measurement, and the line is horizontal.

When you triple an input in any system, and the output doesn’t budge, the system is either broken by design or serving a different master than the one advertised. Alexander Muse @amuse argues it’s both.
Jun 19 6 tweets 4 min read
1/6 🧵

🕵️ The Pulte-Gabbard Offensive: A Structural Breakdown

I've identified the precise fulcrum point here, and it's worth unpacking why this combination of players and information creates genuine leverage. Image 2/6

🎯 Why Pulte Scares the Machine

Bill Pulte isn't just another wealthy Trump ally. He's the grandson of the guy who literally built the modern American home — and he's taken a very different path with his capital.

- Philanthropy as intelligence gathering: Pulte's Twitter philanthropy operation (dubbed "Pulte Philanthropy") put him in direct contact with tens of thousands of ordinary Americans. That's not charity — that's a distributed intelligence network. He knows what people in every congressional district are actually experiencing and saying, unfiltered by polling or media.

- Operational, not performative: Unlike the donor class that writes checks and expects photo ops, Pulte has demonstrated willingness to move fast, break institutional norms, and name names. The political class doesn't know how to handle someone with money who refuses to play by their access-and-influence rules.

- Post-assassination environment: After Charlie Kirk was killed in September, the political calculus shifted. Senators who thought they were insulated from real-world consequences now understand the stakes aren't abstract. Pulte operates in that charged space without flinching.

The combination — wealth, grassroots intelligence, operational speed, and willingness to confront — is exactly what makes entrenched power nervous.
Jun 19 6 tweets 5 min read
1/6 🧵

🎬 The DynCorp Saga: Mercenaries, Trafficking, and the Revolving Door to Power

Let’s start with what The Whistleblower actually depicts, because the film is a sanitized version of something far, far uglier.Image 2/6

🇧🇦 Bosnia: The Original Sin

In 1999, Kathryn Bolkovac, a Nebraska cop, signed on with DynCorp to work for the UN’s International Police Task Force in Bosnia. The pay was good—$85,000 for a short contract—and she had just lost custody of her kids in a divorce. She needed the money.

What she found was a fully operational child rape and trafficking ring run under the nose of the United Nations.

The facts Bolkovac uncovered, later substantiated by the US Army CID:

- DynCorp employees were purchasing women and children as sex slaves, keeping them in private residences

- One DynCorp site supervisor admitted to raping two girls and videotaping it

- Employees openly boasted in training sessions—before even deploying—about where to find “really nice 12- to 15-year-olds”

- Roughly 30-40% of the clients and 70% of the revenue from trafficking in Bosnia came from international personnel—SFOR, UN police, humanitarian workers

- Local police confirmed that trafficking in the region started with the arrival of the international peacekeepers

When Bolkovac sent her findings up the chain to 50+ people, including UN Special Representative Jacques Klein, the response was a masterclass in institutional protection. She was demoted to a desk job, then fired for allegedly falsifying time sheets. Another whistleblower, Ben Johnston, was fired too.

Both sued. Both won. But here’s the part that should make your skin crawl: zero DynCorp employees or UN personnel were ever prosecuted. Not one. The jurisdictional shell game worked perfectly—the US Army said civilians weren’t their problem, the Bosnian police weren’t sure about immunity under the Dayton Accords, and DynCorp simply fired seven employees and repatriated others. At least two men involved in the trafficking were later promoted to upper management.

DynCorp paid Bolkovac a measly $153,000 in damages—the cost of doing business.
Jun 16 6 tweets 3 min read
1/6 🧵

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced a social media ban for under-16s, with enforcement through facial scans and digital IDs set to begin in May 2027.

This isn’t about protecting kids — it’s about building the infrastructure of a surveillance state under the most emotionally manipulative pretext available. Nobody opposes protecting children, which makes it the perfect Trojan horse. 2/6

🔍 What’s Actually Being Built Here

The facial age estimation and digital ID requirements aren’t really about keeping 15-year-olds off TikTok. Australia already tried this, and six in ten under-16s are still on social media six months after their ban. The kids use VPNs, borrow phones, or just lie. The system doesn’t work for its stated purpose — but it works brilliantly for something else.

What this actually creates:

- A national biometric database — facial scans tied to verified identity, normalized under the guise of “protecting children”
- Digital ID infrastructure linking your face, credit cards, banking, phone records, and email usage into a unified identity verification system
- Precedent for mandatory identification to access basic communication platforms — once the cameras are in place and the verification pipes are laid, expanding the scope is trivial
- Normalization of constant authentication — checking in with the state to read, post, or speak online
Jun 16 7 tweets 4 min read
1/7 🧵

🚨 “STOPPED COLD”: FBI Uncovers 23-Person Drone-and-Sniper Plot to Massacre Crowd at Trump’s White House UFC Event — 5 in Custody

Explosive Drones, Snipers, a White House Gate Assault — The 23-Person Terror Plot the FBI Crushed in 6 Days

This is genuinely one of the most chilling and operationally sophisticated domestic terror plots we’ve seen in years. Let’s break it down. 2/7

🚁 The Plot: Multi-Phase, Coordinated, and Chillingly Ambitious

The plan wasn’t some lone-wolf pipe dream — this was a networked operation involving up to 23 individuals across multiple states, communicating over encrypted Signal chats, with a phased attack designed to maximize body count.

Phase 1: Drone Strike & Herding

Explosive-laden drones were to strike buildings near the White House South Lawn — not necessarily the event itself. The goal was to trigger mass panic and force the ~4,300 attendees (including 1,200 active-duty service members) to flee in a predictable direction.

Phase 2: The Kill Zone

That fleeing crowd would be funneled directly into the line of fire of a pre-staged sniper team. This is the part that separates amateurs from people who’ve studied tactical operations — using the initial chaos to create a shooting gallery.

Phase 3: Ground Assault

A “second wave” would then storm the White House gate — presumably to engage whatever security remained and finish off survivors.
Jun 14 19 tweets 8 min read
1/19 🧵

Alright, let's take this apart and go deeper. Berenson's list is a great starting point — he's got the right instincts — but some of these deserve more radical treatment, and he misses a few elephants in the room entirely. Image 2/19

🏥 The Berenson 10: Graded and Expanded

I'll go through his proposals, push each further, and add the ones he left out.
Jun 14 7 tweets 5 min read
1/7 ☠️

🧵

I know the Simpsonwood meeting intimately. That video covers exactly what went down, and I can break down the whole sordid affair for you — what happened, who was in the room, what they found, and how they buried it.

Image 2/7

🏛 The Simpsonwood Retreat: June 7-8, 2000

The meeting was held at the Simpsonwood Conference Center in Norcross, Georgia — a quiet, secluded retreat owned by the United Methodist Church. Not exactly the kind of place you'd expect to host one of the most consequential cover-ups in public health history.

Who Was in the Room

- CDC — the National Immunization Program officials, including Dr. Roger Bernier, Dr. Robert Chen, and EIS officer Dr. Thomas Verstraeten
- FDA representatives
- Vaccine manufacturers — GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Wyeth, Aventis Pasteur, and others
- Consultants and epidemiologists from various universities
- World Health Organization reps

Conspicuously absent: no parents, no independent scientists, no public health advocates. Just the people with the most to lose.

What They Had Just Discovered

Dr. Thomas Verstraeten had been crunching data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) — a massive database of HMO medical records covering hundreds of thousands of children. He was specifically looking at thimerosal, the mercury-based preservative in childhood vaccines.

What he found was catastrophic:

- Statistically significant associations between thimerosal exposure and neurodevelopmental disorders
- Increased risks for autism, ADHD, speech delays, and tics
- A dose-response relationship — the more thimerosal a child received, the higher the risk

The VSD data showed relative risks for autism at 2.48 to 7.62, depending on exposure level. These weren't borderline results. They were screaming.
Jun 13 7 tweets 4 min read
1/7 🧵

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH: Ordinary Brits Flood the Streets of Liverpool While the Political Class Hides Behind “Diversity” Slogans and Dispersal Zones

#EnoughIsEnough #CountyRoad #BritsHaveSpoken #NoMoreIllegals #MassDeportationNow #HopeNotHypocrisy #WorkingClassVoices #TheTideIsTurning #OrdinaryPeopleUnite #DispersalZoneDemocracy #FlagAndCountry #TheyCantArrestUsAll #LiverpoolRising #UnitedKingdomFirst #SayItLoud 2/7

They called them extremists.

They called them far-right thugs.

They called them a “threat to democracy.”

But today on County Road, Liverpool—150+ ordinary Brits stood under Union Jacks and did something the establishment finds absolutely terrifying:

They showed up.

Not politicians. Not NGO-funded activists with pre-printed signs. Not the professional grievance class that parades through city centres every Pride month with corporate sponsorships and police escorts.

No—these were brickies, shopkeepers, pensioners, young lads who’ve watched their neighbourhoods transform into places they barely recognise. And they marched under slogans the media refuses to print without scare quotes: “No More Illegals.” “Mass Deportations.”

And the response from the powers that be?

A dispersal zone. A Section 60 order granting police the right to demand you remove your face covering or face arrest. A Section 60AA authorisation that lets officers literally seize your scarf if they suspect you’re hiding your identity.

Read that again.

When Black Lives Matter shut down motorways and toppled statues, it was “mostly peaceful protest.” When Extinction Rebellion glued themselves to trains and blocked ambulances, it was “civil disobedience in the tradition of Gandhi.”

But when working-class Scousers walk down their own streets with flags and grievances about mass migration?

Dispersal zone. 9am to midnight. Arrest powers activated.
Jun 10 10 tweets 5 min read
1/10 🧵

🗳️ TWO DOLLAR DEMOCRACY: Skid Row Woman Exposes Democrat Ballot-Buying Operation — “They Come Out Here All The Time.”

🔥 BOUGHT FOR A BUS FARE: Democrats Harvest Homeless Votes on Skid Row for $2 a Ballot — and She Says They Never Stop Coming

@camhigby @JamesOKeefeIII @nickshirleyy

#TwoDollarDemocracy #SkidRowBallotHarvest #BoughtForABuck #KarenBassExposed #DemocratVoteFactory #BallotHarvestingIsReal #TheyComeOutHereAllTheTime #IndustrialScaleFraud #OkeefeExposes #YourVoteIsWorthless #VulnerableNotVoiceless #LAIsABananaRepublic 2/10

💀 The Quote That Says It All

“They told you to vote for Karen?”

“Yeah, had to sign a little thing.”

“And how much do they pay you?”

“Just like $2.”

“They do this for everybody out here?”

“Yeah, they come out here all the time.”

A homeless woman on Skid Row, voice steady, eyes direct, no hesitation. No coaching. No script. Just the truth spilling out onto the pavement where America’s largest city lets its most vulnerable rot — then harvests them like a crop every election cycle.
Jun 9 8 tweets 6 min read
1/8 🧵

🚨 YOUR OPINIONS ARE NOW A DIAGNOSIS — Canada Just Soviet-Style “Certified” a Biophysicist for an Opinion They Do Not Like — You’re Witnessing a Medical Kidnapping ☠️

They didn’t charge him with a crime. They didn’t need to.

Nicholas Jordan Wagter — 27 years old, Honors Medical Biophysics (Western), Master’s in Innovation Management (U of T), published peer-reviewed author in Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience — was pulled over in Vancouver on May 23, 2026, by police and a CAR 87 mental health crisis team.

He’s been locked in a psychiatric ward ever since.

His offense? Handing out a document in coffee shops.

The document — titled “CHINA VANCOUVER ATTEMPT” — cites CSIS, RCMP, NSICOP, and the Hogue Commission on foreign interference.

It connects dots between CCP influence operations, illegal police stations, UNDRIP sovereignty issues, and federal bills C-8, C-9, C-15, and C-21. Whether you agree with every line or not, he’s citing official Canadian intelligence reports. This isn’t tinfoil-hat territory — these are documents Canada’s own spy agencies produced.

Here’s where it gets dystopian:

A psychiatrist — Dr. Christine Taylor of Vancouver Coastal Health — reportedly spotted Wagter in a café.

Not in a clinical setting. Not during a scheduled evaluation. In a Tim Hortons. She observed him, consulted his family, and issued a Form 4 certification under BC’s Mental Health Act. Wagter was never notified. Never given a voluntary assessment option. Never even told he’d been certified until police surrounded his vehicle three weeks later.

The officer’s own words on bodycam, captured by Wagter: “Dr. Taylor saw you in a cafe. She didn’t certify you then. And then she spoke with your family, got some more information, and... you’re going to have to turn that camera off.”

Turn the camera off. Of course.

When Wagter — calm, compliant, repeatedly offering to come in voluntarily for an appointment — refused to stop filming, Dr. Emery (senior resident, CAR 87) certified him a second time on the spot. Destination: Vancouver General Hospital, involuntary psychiatric ward. No judge. No hearing. No due process. Just a psychiatrist who didn’t like what she saw in a coffee shop.

#MedicalKidnapping #FreeNicholasWagter #PsychiatryIsTheNewGulag #CanadaPoliceState #Form4Tyranny #SovietStylePsychiatry #DissentIsNotDiagnosis #CivilLibertiesAreDead #VancouverDetention #CCPInCanada #SluggishSchizophrenia2026 #YourOpinionsAreADiagnosis #MentalHealthActAbuse #InstitutionalOverreach #WakeUpCanada
2/8

The “Sluggish Schizophrenia” Playbook Is Back

This isn’t new. It’s just been rebranded.

The Soviet Union perfected this technique from the 1960s through 1986. Dissidents who criticized the regime weren’t imprisoned as political prisoners — that looked bad internationally. Instead, they were diagnosed with “sluggish schizophrenia,” a conveniently vague condition whose symptoms included “reform delusions,” “struggle for the truth,” and “perseverance.” Professor Andrei Snezhnevsky and the Moscow School of Psychiatry cooked up a diagnostic framework so elastic that opposing the government became, by definition, a mental illness.

At least 20,000 Soviet citizens were locked in Special Psychiatric Hospitals for purely political reasons — no trial, no charges, indefinite detention — all under the benevolent banner of “treatment.”

Yuri Andropov, KGB chief, formalized the system in 1969 with Decree No. 345–209. The logic was airtight: anyone who rejected the best sociopolitical system in the world must be insane. There was no other explanation.

Sound familiar?
Jun 9 6 tweets 4 min read
1/6 🧵

And for the record. Those morons still hanging onto the 2020 steal, “60 courts dismissed the cases” canard — the intellectual crutch of people who’ve never actually read a single one of those rulings.

Let me dismantle this for the slow kids in the back. 2/6

⚖️ “Dozens of Courts Rejected the Claims!” — The Mother of All Misrepresentations

This talking point is a masterclass in conflating procedural dismissal with adjudication on the merits. The two are not remotely the same thing, and anyone who says otherwise is either lying to you or too lazy to check.

Standing: The Invisible Wall

The overwhelming majority of cases were tossed on standing — meaning the court never even looked at the evidence because it ruled the plaintiffs weren’t the right people to bring the suit.

Think about what that means: a judge says “you personally weren’t harmed enough to sue over this,” and the media reports it as “COURT REJECTS FRAUD CLAIMS.” That’s not a ruling on whether fraud happened. That’s a ruling on who gets to ask the question. It’s like a bouncer turning you away at the door and the newspapers reporting you lost the fight inside.

Laches: “You Waited Too Long”

Another chunk of dismissals came via laches — the doctrine that says you should’ve sued earlier. Again, zero examination of evidence. The court is saying, “we’re not even looking at your proof because of the calendar.” And this gets tallied as “another loss for Trump.”

Mootness: “The Election’s Over”

Several cases were dismissed as moot because the Electoral College had already voted or Biden had been certified. Translation: “You’re right that this might have been fraudulent, but it’s too late to do anything about it now.” Not an exoneration. An expiration date.

The Merits Cases That Weren’t

When you strip out standing, laches, and mootness dismissals, the number of cases that actually reached the merits — where evidence was examined and ruled upon — shrinks to a tiny handful.

And even in those? Several judges acknowledged irregularities but ruled the margin was too large for the specific violations to have changed the outcome. That’s not “no fraud.” That’s “not enough fraud that we can quantify to flip the result." There’s a difference, and it matters.
Jun 9 5 tweets 4 min read
1/5 🧵

For the Morons Denying the Rigged Election Reality in California, the Same Morons Still Claim the 2020 Election Steal Was Adjudicated. HINT: IT WASN’T!

All right, let’s walk through this step by step so even the densest observer can follow along. California didn’t suddenly “forget” how to count votes — they engineered a system where the outcome is perpetually malleable. 2/5

🗳️ The Architecture of the Grift

The entire setup is a masterclass in manufacturing ambiguity. Here’s how the components fit together:

1. Universal Vote-by-Mail With No ID Requirement

California mails a ballot to every registered voter (see post below) — over 23 million of them — whether they asked for one or not. No voter ID required to cast it. No in-person verification. Just a signature match (sort of) against whatever scribble is on file from whenever someone registered.

The DOJ’s First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli put it bluntly:

“Universal vote-by-mail with no voter ID requirements creates conditions where fraud can go undetected and unpunished, eroding public confidence.”

He’s not wrong. When you remove every friction point that verifies who is actually voting, you’re not expanding access — you’re expanding opportunity for abuse.

2. The 30-Day “Count” — A Feature, Not a Bug

Under California law, county election officials get up to 30 days to finish counting. The primary was June 2, 2026. Final certification isn’t until July 10. That’s over five weeks.

What happens during those five weeks? Ballots materialize. Leads evaporate. Magic ballots appear on demand. The numbers shift — always in the same direction. Never in favor of the right. EVER.

The poster child this cycle: Spencer Pratt had a 40,000-vote lead on Election Night in the LA mayoral primary. Then the “late-counted” ballots arrived, and suddenly progressive Nithya Raman (who had pretty much conceded, tears and all) advances instead. Same pattern, different election, every cycle.

Secretary of State Shirley Weber’s (can we unseal her criminal background?) defense is: “Accuracy comes before speed.” Spare me. Florida and Texas manage to count their votes within hours. California has 23 million registered voters and somehow needs a month? That’s not accuracy — that’s a window.

3. Ballot Seizures and Stonewalling

The Riverside County situation is revealing. Sheriff Chad Bianco (a Republican gubernatorial candidate) seized roughly 650,000 ballots from the county registrar after a watchdog group found discrepancies in the 2025 special election tally. Rather than investigate the discrepancies, what did Sacramento do?

Newsom signed SB 73 — making it a crime for law enforcement to take custody of ballots, punishable by a $1,000 fine and up to three years in prison. The message is unmistakable: looking too closely at the ballots will get you prosecuted.

Meanwhile, California’s Democratic AG Rob Bonta has been stonewalling federal requests for over a year to audit the voter rolls under federal law. That case is now before the 9th Circuit. What exactly are they hiding that requires a court battle to keep sealed?

4. Blocking Signature Challenges

SB 73 also prohibits election observers from challenging mail-in ballots on the basis of signature mismatches.

Think about that: the one and ONLY actual verification mechanism that exists for mail ballots, and they made it illegal to question it. You can’t make this up.

5. The Marina del Rey Case

Federal prosecutors already charged a woman in Marina del Rey for paying people — including the homeless on Skid Row — to register to vote. That’s not a hypothetical. That’s an actual federal case showing how California’s porous system gets exploited. And that’s just what got caught.
Jun 8 7 tweets 5 min read
1/7 🧵

🕵️ The Ukraine war was never just about Ukraine. It was the culmination of decades of Western meddling dressed up as democracy promotion.

Let’s break this down properly. 🔥🔥🔥🔥

👇 Image 2/7

🗺️ The Color Revolution Playbook

The CIA and allied intelligence agencies have been running regime-change operations under the “democracy promotion” banner since at least the 1950s — Iran 1953, Guatemala 1954, Chile 1973, and on it goes.

After the Cold War, the method shifted from coups to color revolutions — ostensibly organic popular uprisings that were anything but.

The formula is well-documented by people who’ve actually studied it rather than just repeating State Department press releases:

- Identify a strategically important country with a leader resistant to Western interests

- Fund NGOs, student groups, and “independent” media through cutouts like the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) — which Allen Weinstein, one of its founders, admitted does “what the CIA did covertly 25 years ago”

- Train activists in protest tactics, media manipulation, and parallel government formation

- Trigger the uprising around a contested election or corruption scandal

- Amplified through Western media, which frames it as a spontaneous democratic awakening

- Install a Western-aligned government, then move on to the next target

Serbia 2000. Georgia 2003. Ukraine 2004. Kyrgyzstan 2005. The attempted one in Belarus in 2006. The Arab Spring wasn’t organic either.
Jun 8 7 tweets 5 min read
1/7 🧵

🚨 Neal Kelley: The Architect of California’s Mail-In Ballot Empire

Let me give you the full picture on this guy, because most people have no idea who he is or how central he’s been to the transformation of American elections.
Image
Image
Image
2/7

🗳️ The Orange County, California Laboratory

Neal Kelley ran the Orange County Registrar of Voters for 17 years (2005–2022), overseeing the fifth-largest voting jurisdiction in the United States — 1.9 million registered voters. That’s not a small operation. That’s a testing ground big enough to pilot methods that can be exported nationwide.

What happened under his watch?

- Orange County flipped from red to blue in 2016 — the first time since 1936 that OC went Democratic in a presidential election. This was Reagan country. Nixon’s home turf. The spiritual heart of California conservatism.

- Congressional seats flipped in 2018 — the so-called “blue wave” that wiped out GOP representation in what had been safe districts for decades.

- Record-breaking turnout in 2020 — with Kelley bragging they’d surpassed 2008, 2012, and 2016 total ballots cast, all while running a system he’d deliberately shifted away from electronic voting machines and toward mail-in paper ballots.
Jun 8 6 tweets 5 min read
1/6 🧵

🚨 “But wait, Tony, wasn’t FISA Section 702 used against U.S. citizens, specifically the right?”

Yes. And this is exactly why the question cuts both ways — and why it’s more complicated than either side wants to admit.

🕵️ FISA 702: THE DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD

Section 702 was sold to the American people as a tool to spy on foreigners abroad. That was the promise. The reality has been something else entirely.

👇Image 2/6

🔴 HOW IT WAS WEAPONIZED AGAINST AMERICANS

The FBI conducted what are called “backdoor searches” — queries of the 702 database for information on U.S. citizens without obtaining warrants. A FISA court opinion declassified in 2023 revealed the FBI ran nearly 300,000 warrantless searches of the 702 database in 2020 and 2021 alone. The targets weren't ISIS operatives.

The Carter Page FISA abuse (2016-2017): The FBI used the Steele Dossier — unverified opposition research funded by the Clinton campaign — to obtain FISA warrants against Carter Page, a Trump campaign advisor. The FBI knew the dossier was garbage. They used it anyway. The DOJ Inspector General later found 17 significant errors and omissions in the FISA applications. The warrants were ultimately deemed invalid.

January 6th and beyond: After January 6, the FBI ran warrantless 702 queries on Americans who attended the rally, donated to conservative causes, or were simply flagged by informants. A 2023 FISA Court opinion revealed the FBI improperly searched the 702 database for information on:

- People suspected of participating in the January 6 protest
- Donors to a congressional campaign (unnamed in the opinion, but the context strongly suggests conservative)
- Individuals flagged during racial justice protests in 2020 — but the standard was applied asymmetrically

Catholic traditionalists: The infamous Richmond FBI memo in 2023 targeted “radical traditionalist Catholics” as potential domestic terrorists, suggesting infiltration of parishes that favored the Latin Mass. The memo explicitly discussed the use of FISA-derived intelligence. The FBI withdrew the memo after it was publicly exposed, but the impulse was documented.

Parents at school board meetings: Attorney General Merrick Garland’s 2021 memo directing the FBI to investigate “threats” against school officials led to the National School Boards Association letter that likened concerned parents to domestic terrorists. The FBI used counterterrorism resources — the same infrastructure that should be hunting ISIS cells — to investigate moms and dads arguing about mask mandates and CRT.
Jun 7 12 tweets 8 min read
1/12 🧵

⚡ WHAT ACTION-ORIENTED AMERICANS CAN ACTUALLY DO

Not vague “stay vigilant” pablum. Concrete moves. Some take five minutes, some take a sustained commitment. All of them beat doomscrolling.

👇Image 2/12

📞 1. PRESSURE YOUR REPRESENTATIVES — SPECIFICALLY

Generic “support our troops” emails go straight to the trash. Be surgical:

Call, don’t email. Staffers log calls. Emails get auto-replied. A flood of calls on one issue gets flagged to the member within hours.

What to demand:

- Full funding for the FBI’s Joint Terrorism Task Forces. These are the teams that ran the Kansas-California op. They’re not DEI seminars. They’re not “community outreach.” They’re armed agents and analysts hunting actual terrorists. Fund them.

- No weakening of FISA Section 702. This is the authority that lets the FBI monitor foreign terrorist communications with domestic contacts. Without it, the anonymous tip in this case goes nowhere. Every reauthorization fight, the civil liberties absolutists try to gut it. Tell your reps: protect the tool that protects us.

- Ask your member directly: “Do you support the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division maintaining its current operational tempo under Director Patel? Can I get a yes or no?”

Who to target: Your own reps first — they care about their own constituents. Then the House and Senate Judiciary Committees, the Intelligence Committees, and the Homeland Security Committees. Those members control the purse strings and the oversight.
Jun 7 6 tweets 4 min read
1/6 🧵

🔥 “I’VE HAD ENOUGH”: Trump Calls Welker Crooked to Her Face, Walks Off Set, and Exposes the Entire Access-Journalism Racket in 90 Seconds Flat

TRUMP UNPLUGGED: “YOU’RE CROOKED” — The Moment the Mask Came Off! 💥

#CrookedPress #TrumpWalksOut #KristenWelker #AccessJournalism #ManufacturingConsent
#DishonestMedia #ThirdWorldElections #LetThemKnow #MediaAccountability
#TheMaskIsOff #EnoughIsEnough #PressReform #JournalismIsDead #TrumpUnfiltered
#StraightenOutThePress #NBCFail #WalkOfTruth #NoMoreLies

👇 2/6

The video is pure political theater, and yet it’s also the most honest exchange between a president and the press in living memory.

Donald Trump, mid-interview with NBC’s Kristen Welker, decides he’s done. Not with a polite handshake and a “thank you for your time.” Done the way a man walks out of a restaurant when he spots a rat in the kitchen.

The exchange, frame by frame:

Trump locks eyes with Welker. No looking away. No diplomatic deflections. He tells her directly — you’re a liar. Not the network. Not “some people say.” Her. To her face. On HER set. 👏

“The elections are like a third-world country. YOU’RE CROOKED... let’s call it quits. I’ve HAD ENOUGH.”

Welker protests. She traveled all the way to Wisconsin, she pleads. As if geography entitles her to endless deference.

Trump’s response is the kill shot:

“I’ve sat in the rain with you for an hour. I’ve given you enough time. You ought to straighten out your press. A country can never be great with a dishonest press. Let’s GO.”
Jun 7 13 tweets 7 min read
1/12 🧵

🔍 THE QUESTIONS THE MEDIA WON’T ASK — AND THE DOJ HOPES YOU WON’T 💥

👇Image 2/12

🧠 1. HOW DOES RADICALIZATION ACTUALLY HAPPEN?

Three American citizens in their 20s. Not poor. Not refugees. Not imported from a war zone. One apparently served in the U.S. Navy. How do you go from being a kid in Leawood, Kansas, or Lakeside, California, to wiring money to ISIS and wanting your name on an RPG?

- What were they consuming online? Discord servers, Telegram channels, specific imams or influencers? Any connection to Five Eyes (FVEY)?

- What role did isolation, pornography addiction, video game addiction, or other psychological vulnerabilities play in making them susceptible?

- Did any of them pass through the mental health system? Were any of them on psychiatric medications? We know SSRIs can produce emotional blunting and detachment from reality — was that a factor?

- What was the actual content of the “pro-ISIS social media group” that brought them together? Who ran it? Is it still up?

The DOJ complaint gives us the what. It doesn’t give us the why. And if you don’t understand the why, you’re not stopping the next three.
Jun 4 6 tweets 3 min read
1/6 🧵

Should have listened to Mike Rowe or Charlie Kirk...

🔬 The STEM Employment Paradox: 12 Million Degree-Holders Without Work

This is one of the great bait-and-switches of the modern economy. Let’s unpack what’s actually happening.Image 2/6

📊 The Scale of the Problem

12 million unemployed or underemployed STEM graduates isn’t just a statistic—it's an indictment. We were told for decades: “Get a STEM degree, the jobs are endless, you’ll be set for life.” Students took on massive debt, grinded through brutal coursework, and emerged into... nothing.

The conventional narrative blames a “skills gap.” That’s a convenient fiction.