Thread by @BuissnessN72372

They Opposed It, and History Forgot (1/4)

Opening

There's a familiar narrative: Jews in Arab lands waited for Zionism, welcomed it joyfully, and fled to Israel at the first opportunity. That narrative is convenient. It's also, for the most part, not true.

Jewish leaders in Iraq, in Egypt, and elsewhere — rabbis, lawyers, philanthropists — opposed Zionism actively, publicly, and at times with remarkable courage. They didn't do this out of betrayal of the Jewish people. They did it out of a deep conviction that their home already existed — and that it was in Baghdad, in Cairo, not in Palestine.

First Figure: Menachem Saleh Daniel

[Image: Menachem Saleh Daniel]

On September 8, 1922, Menachem Saleh Daniel — Iraq's first Jewish senator, the wealthiest man among Iraqi Jews, the man who hosted King Faisal I in his own home when the king's palace was destroyed by flooding — sat down and wrote a letter to the secretary of the Zionist Organization in London.

He didn't write in anger. He wrote with great respect, almost apologetically: he began by expressing his admiration for their noble ideal. Then came the "but." In Iraq, he explained, Zionism was not an entirely ideal matter — it represented a problem, with aspects requiring careful consideration, circumstances that no European Jewish community faced. In all Arab lands, he warned, the Zionist movement was seen as a serious threat to Arab national life.

This wasn't a theoretical position. Daniel knew exactly what he was talking about: Jews had lived in Iraq for some 3,500 years. They would not emigrate, he argued, unless forced to — and if forced, it would be the fault of government policy, not genuine desire.

His son, Ezra Daniel, inherited his seat in the Senate — and was the only one among Iraq's Jewish community leaders who spoke out openly, in his Senate speeches, against the government's discriminatory policies. His speeches weren't published in the press. They were echoed by word of mouth, precisely because they came from someone who wasn't a Zionist.

According to the Iraqi historian Nabil al-Rubaie, the graves of Menachem and Ezra Daniel in the city of Kifl were removed.

Second Figure: Yosef al-Kabir (2/4)

Yosef al-Kabir was no ordinary lawyer. He was deputy chairman of the Iraqi Bar Association — an unprecedented achievement for a member of the Jewish minority at the time — and a member of the team of jurists who drafted independent Iraq's constitution in the 1920s. His brother, Ibrahim al-Kabir, served as deputy director-general of the Iraqi Ministry of Finance.

On November 5, 1938, al-Kabir published a letter in the Iraq Times, Baghdad's leading English-language newspaper. He didn't write as an enemy of Zionism out of hatred — he wrote as a lawyer examining the problem closely. The Balfour Declaration, he argued, had attempted to solve a European problem — and would remain one, in both its origin and the scope of its impact. He warned that the Declaration was a dangerous formula for political acrobatics, built on a partnership that could not actually be realized.

This wasn't the writing of an isolated man. A fully independent, secular Iraqi-Arab source, published decades later by a researcher with no Jewish affiliation, quoted this very letter precisely — evidence that this position was etched into Iraqi historical memory itself, not only in Jewish sources.

Two years later, in 1941, when the Farhud pogrom struck Baghdad, al-Kabir did not stand aside. He served on the official commission of inquiry, and insisted that the violence had not been a spontaneous mob outburst — it had been an organized plan, led by pro-Nazi figures within the government, headed by Minister of Information Yunis al-Sabawi.

Al-Kabir believed the Jews' future lay in equal citizenship in Iraq — "sons of the faith of Moses," not a separate people. Only in his later years, as discriminatory legislation tightened its grip, did he come to understand that this vision had failed. He emigrated to London, where he continued working for the rights of Iraqi Jews who had been forced to leave everything behind.

Third Figure: Chaim Nahum Effendi — A Leader Between Two Pressures (3/4)

[Image: Chaim Nahum Effendi]

Not all opposition looked the same. Chaim Nahum Effendi represents an entirely different kind of standing firm — cautious, sophisticated, not always heroic, but real.

Born in Turkey, a descendant of Spanish exiles, Nahum served as Chacham Bashi (chief rabbi) of the entire Ottoman Empire, and then, from 1925, as chief rabbi of Egyptian Jewry. He was an extraordinarily prolific scholar: he wrote a book on Babylonian Jewry, a book on Karaite Judaism, and even translated into French every Ottoman decree sent to Egypt over nearly 400 years. He was a familiar presence at the courts of two Egyptian kings and served in the Egyptian Senate.

When the War of Independence broke out in 1948, Nahum found himself caught between two impossible pressures. The Egyptian government demanded he publicly denounce Zionism — and he complied, but with notable caution: the "condemnation" he issued was described at the time as weak. At the same time, when that same government demanded he add a prayer for Egypt's victory in the war to synagogue services, he refused.

This was a delicate, deliberate balance: giving the government the minimum it demanded, without mobilizing religion itself for a war that wasn't his own.

Nahum was not a man of revolution. He was a man trying to keep an entire community alive one more day, one more year — hundreds of Jews arrested and interrogated for "Zionist activity," businesses seized, bank accounts frozen. At age 78, he lost his eyesight. He died in 1960, after 35 years in office.

Not everyone who resisted did so loudly. Some did it through calculated silence that couldn't easily be read — one refusal, one compliance, a hundred small choices that determined where the line was drawn.

What They Knew (4/4)

Three figures. Three different kinds of standing firm — the philanthropist who wrote a polite but unyielding letter, the lawyer who confronted the official narrative head-on, the rabbi who navigated quietly between two worlds that each demanded his total loyalty.

What they shared wasn't a single ideology. It was a simple understanding, repeated again and again: they weren't "Jews exiled to Iraq" or "Jews exiled to Egypt." They were Iraqis and Egyptians who also happened to be Jewish. Their home already existed. It required no geographic correction.

Menachem Daniel knew Jews had lived in Iraq for 3,500 years. Yosef al-Kabir believed the future lay in equal citizenship, as "sons of the faith of Moses." Chaim Nahum navigated, with endless caution, to keep an entire community alive one more day.

And then it ended anyway — not because they were wrong, but because forces larger than them, on both sides of the border, decided otherwise.

Official history sometimes remembers only the ending. This piece is an attempt to also remember those who saw it coming and said so out loud.

@threadreaderapp unroll