The idea behind care integration is not new, but despite multiple attempts and reports, internal market reforms since the 1990s have taken things in the opposite direction.
Communication of STPs, ICSs, ACOs, and ICPs was dreadful. Really dreadful. Future work must place patients and communities front and center.
Many of the original sustainability and transformation plans were also pretty awful. Despite Simon Stevens trying to reassure people that we shouldn't take them too seriously, patients and staff of course remain suspicious and it will take a lot of work to get them back on board.
There remain significant problems regarding funding for transformation and how it is allocated, and how STPs and ICSs 'are not a substitute for adequate funding of the [wider NHS] system'.
So, STPs are designed to integrate care but the current STP performance dashboard doesn't try to measure integration?! Similarly community engagement and prevention are broadly left out.
Related to this, the governance and the legal framework surrounding all these acronyms needs to be sorted. Without a solid footing it's really hard for local leaders to meaningfully transform care and to navigate the crazy mix of NHS/LA accountable bodies and frameworks.
My only real criticism of the report is the role of LA public health and PHE in shaping and delivering STPs is largely left out of the conversation. Yes, prevention is there but not much on how it can practically be better addressed.
But overall, this report's a really useful summary of everything going on with NHS integrated care right now. Integration and circumnavigating the internal market is clearly a required aspect of a sustainable NHS, but so is a proper #NHS70 long-term funding settlement.
Gov data shows how price promos are more likely to be applied to unhealthy junk food rather than healthier foods.
And rather than saving people ££, they can lead to around 22% *more* purchases than would otherwise happen, with *more* money spent and *more* consumption.
That's why companies use these promotions.
That's also why the policy was in the obesity strategy in the first place. The irony being that it is more likely to help than hinder the impact of the cost of living crisis on individuals and families.
In today's @Telegraph, Sally O'Brien & I discuss @HealthFdn / @IpsosUK polling results on public attitudes to gov policy on alcohol, tobacco, & unhealthy food (no £-wall🔓)
🧵Tl,dr: While gov has a preference for individual responsibility, the public still think gov should act.
Gains in healthy life-expectancy have stalled, childhood obesity continues to rise, alcohol-related hospital admissions are up, and tobacco still causes over 500,000 admissions a year.
And there are huge inequalities with more deprived areas disproportionately impacted.
Yet the recent trend of unwinding public health policy continues.
The tobacco control plan is unpublished, junk food ad bans have been delayed, plans for a national approach to health inequalities have gone & there's been nothing on alcohol since 2012.
First the good news. COVID cases in hospital clearly falling, in all ages, regions (except perhaps still plateauing in Yorkshire and Humber).
There's still a lag on cases in intensive care and on deaths, but they'll drop soon as well.
Flu, however, seems to be on the rise.
Overall case & admission rates are relatively low, but trending up.
And with a higher % of lab respiratory samples (sent in by dr from people with chest symptoms) testing for flu than at the same time in the past 5 yrs. i.e., it's early
This is a really helpful and timely piece of work by @davidfinchthf.
Along with last week's @TheIFS report on how government ££ are spent, it's clear that we need to do more to align public health funding with local needs. 🧵
Over the last decade, gains in life expectancy in England have stalled.
And it will be no surprise that the impact has not been felt evenly by everyone.
While life expectancy continues to increase for people living in the least deprived parts of the country, people from the most deprived communities are dying earlier.
This type of shortsighted policy review has reared its head again.
Health is an *asset* & the types of obesity policies being looked at here are exactly the ones that are both most effective AND most likely to narrow inequalities. 🧵