Yes, actually pre-sell-out @CarolineFlintMP would have disagreed with that.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @MrHarryCole view original on Twitter
Pre-sell-out @CarolineFlintMP would have argued that immigration may have been an issue people wanted exploit to leave the EU but the failures were ours, not the European Unions. She would have called for an open discussion on the benefits or immigration.
Pre-sell-out @CarolineFlintMP wouldn’t have just framed immigration in terms of who we could and couldn’t get, but what opportunities we were losing, and she would have taken account of the dishonesty in the making of the decision.
Pre-sell-out @CarolineFlintMP would have been cautious of the direction we are taking on the basis of those who are directing us.
Pre-sell-out @CarolineFlintMP would have wanted to protect the jobs, the rights, the benefits, and the enjoyment we get out of them.
Pre-sell-out @CarolineFlintMP would have wanted to protect the jobs, the rights, the benefits, and the enjoyment we get out of them.
It is nothing but cowardice and a dereliction of duty when a leader of people chooses to sink to a level that dehumanises human beings in that way, instead of setting an example in language, in tone, in thought, and in deed.
It looks like we need new leaders in this country.
(Cowards need not apply)
/End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Arguing that Brexit has damaged the economy is not productive. It's quite difficult to model the counterfactuals and there are arm-chair economists who can 'refute' a sophisticated economic model with a lack of understanding of basic concepts like inflation.
Asking people to name a benefit of Brexit and you will get twitter talking about the benefits of Brexit.
Many people can find 'benefits'. Whether or not they are benefits is a different thing.
William claims he refused to campaign for the European Communities while also saying it did not infringe on our sovereignty.
The Community involved some sacrifice of sovereignty, it would be less than honest not to say that. In a sense we should give up some of our political sovereignty.
1. Dear @mariannaspring, you don’t know me, but I work on breaking up a particular conspiracy theory, and if you have time, I’d really like to talk to you about a possible story for BBC Verify. 🧵
2. Here in the book ‘The Great Deception’, co-written by conspiracy theorist Christopher Booker, a reference to the 1996 BBC documentary ‘The Poisoned Chalice’ is used as proof that Edward Heath was not giving us the whole story.
3. While the programme does not support the claim, it does claim that while plans for Monetary Union were being discussed during the negotiations, they “went far beyond anything in the minds of most MPs”.
This is why I think the CPTPP deal isn't a great deal. I'm not against it, but the cumulation gain is of greater benefit to companies located in the other signatories than to UK industry.
Another example of the government putting bragging rights over British companies.
Cumulation is a good thing, but it is more likely to be a factor among countries that are geographically closer.
And when I think about CPTPP it's very difficult to forget there are low wage economies and high-tech economies and conclude that's quite a good recipe for cumulation.
"This is a win against all those disdainful Europhiles who said that an independent Britain would be too weak and unimportant to run its own trade policy."
Those 'Europhiles' were in equal number to the Brexiteers who said the same thing.
If every one of their strawmen had a vote, we'd have won the referendum by a landslide.
"The UK and China applied for CPTPP membership within six months of each other in 2021. Our accession provides us with a veto on other members joining the agreement"
A kick in the teeth when you remember we could always veto Turkey...