According to the testimony of the Attorney General in the IG report, nine days before the election she and the FBI Director discussed how a “deep and visceral hatred of Secretary Clinton” by a cadre of senior NY FBI agents “has put us where we are today” w/r/t the Weiner laptop.
This conversation indicates that senior DOJ leadership concluded in real time that the deep political bias of senior FBI agents had led directly to official (and, per the IG, improper) investigative decisions, particularly the Comey letter.
Moreover, expert analysis suggests that those official decisions, which the AG tells us was prompted by what the FBI Director described as the “deep and visceral hatred” of one candidate by senior FBI employees, swung the election to the other candidate. fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-c…
Coverage of the IG report has not focused on this revelation of political bias, indeed “hatred,” by FBI agents affecting the election outcome. Instead it has been preoccupied with Strzok/Page, whose views the IG concluded had not affected the investigation much less the election.
These coverage choices mirror the asymmetry Democrats complained of in coverage of the email scandal itself. Much graver wrongdoing on the pro-Trump side is overlooked or given scant notice in favor of hypervigilant coverage of petty misconduct that media know Trump will amplify.
This is an important conversation between the Attorney General and the FBI Director. It occurred real time before the election and it concerned a grave, election-altering allegation of misconduct that the IG conspicuously did not resolve. Please give it the attention it deserves!
Strzok and Page are famous names now. We’ve read their texts. We know some of the most intimate details of of their lives. Who are the FBI agents whose “hatred” of one candidate prompted the Comey letter? What’s in their chat history? Will we ever get that part of the story?
Here’s a link to the IG report. The excerpt above is from the section on the October 31, 2016 conversation between Lynch and Comey, page 387. justice.gov/file/1071991/d…
The paragraph of Lynch’s testimony immediately preceding the excerpt above: Comey agreed with her view that he would not have sent his October letter but for fear of leaks. Then they launch into their discussion of the “visceral hatred” of Clinton in the FBI NY office.
One more note. This series of tweets from the day of the Comey letter describing an overheard conversation on an airplane remains the best reporting anywhere on the 2016 FBI. It’s still my Rosetta Stone for understanding what happened.
External Tweet loading...
If nothing shows, it may have been deleted
by @nycsouthpaw view original on Twitter
A NY state court hearing is kicking off on the NYAG's motion to compel testimony from former president Trump, Don Jr., and Ivanka, who've all moved to quash their subpoenas.
Trump Sr. is represented at the hearing by Alina Habba, a litigator with offices in Bedminster, NJ. Alan Futerfas is representing the adult Trump children; he previously repped Don Jr. before the Mueller investigation, as well as (a long time ago) a number of NY mafia figures.
Futerfas is monopolizing the beginning of the hearing to push the idea that the NYAG's investigation should be treated as a criminal matter, even though the AG's office has no criminal jurisdiction, because (he says) they're openly working hand-in-glove with the Manhattan DA.
News - Mazars has effectively fired the Trump Organization, citing a non-waivable conflict, and determined that Trump's financial statements from 2011-20 should not be relied on, per a letter to Alan Garten filed in court today.
The rest of the letter
I apologize for not including in my initial tweet the cryptic reference to missing information about "the Matt Calimari Jr. apartment" which Donald Bender apparently cannot get for love or money. It's amazing stuff, obv.
BuzzFeed has obtained through FOIA newly unredacted sections of the Mueller report that show the Special Counsel considered and rejected the idea of charging Donald Trump Jr. and Roger Stone with computer crimes. buzzfeednews.com/article/jasonl…
The SCO also looked at charging J.D. Gordon for changing the Republican platform to weaken the language on supporting Ukraine—a live issue back in 2016 as much as today because that war has been going on so long—but the prosecutors decided they couldn’t prove Russian influence.
Reporting has long been that J.D. Gordon told people the direction to change the language came directly from Trump. npr.org/2017/12/04/568…
“Two individuals were arrested this morning in Manhattan for an alleged conspiracy to launder cryptocurrency that was stolen during the 2016 hack of Bitfinex, … valued at approximately $4.5 billion. Thus far, law enforcement has seized over $3.6 billion.” justice.gov/opa/pr/two-arr…
That’s just …. a lot of money for one law enforcement action.
Like, how many surveillance vans will they buy?
DAG Lisa Monaco says it’s “the department’s largest financial seizure ever.”
I feel so strangely disconnected from pretty much the entirety of Covid discourse I see. I thought I’d offer my own testimony in a thread, mostly to see if it’s familiar to anyone else.
In my little slice of the world, when Omicron came in mid-December and testing lines started stretching down the blocks, govt officials were pretty adamant that they would not be reimposing mitigation measures like indoor dining restrictions. But some restaurants closed anyway.
I was planning to fly to California to see my family over the holidays, so I voluntarily cut out a lot of activities—indoor dining, movie theaters, etc.—but no one ordered me to. And obv I could still travel from a place with lots of Omicron to a place with less.