Before the International Style (modernism) in architecture, our ancestors knew how to adapt the room heights according to the climate, achieving maximum effect (comfort) for the least effort (energy). Today we trust in the grid and so build 8-9 ft rooms from Bermuda to Reykjavik.
In warm climates you need ample ceiling height, as hot air rises the difference in temperature at floor level and ceiling level in a tall room can be as much as 4 degrees c all other things being equal. Here, a comfortable looking gentleman in an 1817 room in Rome, height, ca 5m.
In Brazil, homes were traditionally built with a minimum of 3m ceilings. In the 20th c. an effort was made to conserve building material, and so rooms shrank in size, 20cm each decade, until the modern 2.6m. The only problem was, temperatures rose 1 degree c per 20cm reduction!
As humans are comfortable only in very narrow temperature ranges, small changes make a huge difference. Even the poorer had tall ceilings and could live with comparative comfort, not so much today, and at a huge expenditure in money, time, (fossil fuel) energy, materials.
Conversely, in colder climates, lower ceilings meant higher temperatures. Here are log houses from Russia and Sweden. The efficiently constructed fireplace created an interior draught that sucked fresh air in and expelled smoke, dust. Fans or mechanical ventilation not needed.
In Japan, with hot summers and relatively cold winters, a different technique was called for. Wooden houses allowed for perfect fine tunings of openings depending on exact climate and orientation. Thsi traditional room built to maximize airflow, livable in summers without AC.
By building with nature and climate instead or regardless of it, by adapting our waking hours to the rhythm of the sun we can achieve remarkable levels of comfort—even superior—compared to what we have today in our modern homes built to international, industrial standards.
So far I have mentioned how room height affects temperature, but indoor comfort is also dependent on humidity. Let's see what role materials play in making your room naturally more or less comfortable to be in. Stay to see the grande finale tying all these methods together.
Modern homes are full of materials that have no effect on air humidity: plastics, particle board furniture, PVC wallpaper, vinyl flooring, whereas traditional homes made of natural materials (hygroscopic) such as wood, earth, straw, brick, that helped regulate indoor humidity.
Using wood for your interiors will not only create better indoor air (no off-gassing of formaldehyde, common with particle boards, paints, drapes etc.) it will also help regulate indoor humidity, buffering moisture when air humidity is high and releasing moisture when it is low.
Research shows that wooden interiors can cut the highs and the lows of the humidity cycles by 40-60%, creating a more stable and comfortable indoor climate throughout the day. You can add mud/earth for an even higher effect and comfort. Virtually free, unlike modern dry wall.
Earth plasters, solid rammed earth walls, or earth and mud infill function as a great buffer material for both moisture and heat, research has shown it to have a hugely beneficial impact on the perceived comfort of indoor climates, making it an ideal choice for hot humid summers.
Let's go to Japan. Traditionally, the Japanese urban home (the machiya) combined all of these materials with a construction fine tuned to encourage cross breezes and interior air flow. Humidity was regulated by using wood, woven grass mat floors, earth plaster walls, etc.
During the hot and humid summers of Japan, these houses regulated indoor temperature and humidity—without using any form of mechanical or electrical devices—to a remarkable degree. But the best is yet to come: they knew how to command up a breeze!
The machiya were narrow townhouses with a short front to a paved street. Towns were crowded and densely populated. A machiya was built with a narrow corridor—the tooriniwa—connecting the street with the entire length of the house all the way through to the garden at the back.
The tooriniwa had generous skylights, tenmado that brought natural light in all through the deep house. It went from bare earth (humidity) to the roof (air flow, tall ceilings) allowing the wind to reach even the deepest rooms of the house. Indoor climate control built as a room.
On hot and humid windless days the Japanese had one final trick: uchimizu (打ち水), the scattering of water on the pavement in front of the house (we moderns have a technical term for it: evaporative cooling).
As cool water hits hot pavement, the air temperature can drop up to 13 degrees c in a few seconds, this creates a minute change in the local air pressure, pushing the cooler air into the house, forcing the stale hotter inside air to rise and escape: a breeze. Almost like magic.
It is possible to build far more energy efficiently and comfortable using traditional techniques and materials. Homes can be built for the fraction of the cost of our modern houses, employing locals using only, renewable, local materials: with good care they can last centuries.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Genius biologist Minakata Kumagusu (1867-1941, right in photo) was a fierce environmental protectionist. In 1910 he was arrested for getting drunk and gatecrashing/heckling a meeting of local politicians who wanted to cut down sacred groves to "improve agricultural efficiency."
He spent his time in jail after sobering up by discovering a new species of slime mold. And the politicians eventually gave up. Thug science.
Minakata spoke fluent Japanese (of course), and also English, French, Italian, German, Latin, and Spanish, and could read and write in ancient Greek, Sanskrit, Hebrew and classical Chinese. Banned from life from the British Museum after brawling.
If we are to have any chance for a future we need to start looking at what we have that is sustainable now. The FAO registers Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS), for example the Minabe-Tanabe Ume System, Japan: an integrated orchard and water control system.
The Ume orchards (a sort of hard plum) has been in business for 400 years without the need for technology, pesticides or fertilizers, without erosion. The system integrates the entire area (population 79,000) in a satoyama-satochi system: rice, vegetables, orchards, coppicing.
The key part of the system are the ume orchards, accounting for 50% of all the processed ume fruits sold in the country. Its productivity is astoundingly 200% of any regular ume orchards in Japan, and this is done by relying on honey bees for pollination. So pesticides are out.
Most interesting thing on twitter last month was a tweet from @ploughmansfolly suggesting that 1 in 10 Americans might be better* employed in market gardening, raising a furor similar to what we get when talking parking.
*For reasons of economy, health, soil, animal rights, &c.
The furor was to be expected of course, but it shone a light on the familiar blue-tick disconnect. @ploughmansfolly based his argument on vegetables/chicken. Let's look at chickens. Already 13% of Americans keep chicken. So his argument was low-balling it: just get a bigger coop.
Second argument: grow your own vegetables. This is easy, since the largest crop by area already is lawn turf. 63,000miles² (the State of Georgia is 59,425miles²). Just convert 3-4% of it to greenhouses and cabbage fields. Several farms/gardeners are already doing that.
The Batdam ( 밭담 ) dry stone walls (no mortar) of Jeju Island have been likened to black dragons crawling over the landscape: 21,108km of volcanic field stone dug up by hand and built gradually over the last 1,000 years: without these most agriculture here would be impossible.
The walls protect the little soil there is from wind erosion, they keep livestock out and create a better microclimate at ground level, and provide habitats for wildflowers, insects, animals, and effectively mark family properties.
Due to the rough surface of the volcanic stone and the built in gaps winds can't blow them over. The walls make mechanization difficult preserving and actually contribute to building soil over the centuries which means more and more of the island can be farmed each generation.
"Rice Paddy Dam" is a concept for river basin flood control that originated in northern Japan around the turn of the century. It uses agricultural land as a sort of reservoir to protect downstream urban areas from flood damage and excessive water, the fields used to store water.
When bad rains are anticipated fields can be emptied prematurely and filled up again in a controlled manner that prevents overflow, erosion and scouring using a system of weirs and channels. Depending on the size of the system it can hold vast amounts of water, millions of tons.
As a bonus, after installation it becomes easier to regulate water in the rice paddies with hugely beneficial effects on flora and fauna. The system is voluntary but many cities are now paying farmers to compensate for any damages to crops and for maintaining the system.
Map of Toyama City's (pop 419k) resiliency project by city densification and public transport improvement: development in red zones* get subsidized (think ca. 1/3 of cost of new build). Target: 45% of pop. bef 2045.
*500m from train/tram.
*300m from high freq. bus (>60 per day).
In 2003 Toyama City was facing skyrocketing infrastructure and social services costs: the population was aging, city trams were losing money, health levels were dropping, young ppl. had little hope for the future. Car dependency was increasing at over 70% but fewer could drive...
...so the mayor decided to promote programs to move people into the city, lessen car dependency, improve public transport & promote healthier more active elderly, lower cost of establishing family. 1. The city center zoning laws were relaxed. 2. New home construction subsidies.