Social opprobrium is a powerful tool available to everyone, and the reason that so many privileged people are advising against it is not because it’s uncivil but because it’s effective.
Or unjust society uses social opprobrium against marginalized people every day, and it always has.
That’s why, for example, gay teens have such a high suicide rate. And so on.
The use of social opprobrium by overprivileged people against underprivileged people is an appropriate use of social opprobrium.
Our society has no instinctive reaction to stop that inappropriate use, though. Our society often calls such use “traditional values.”
The demand to stop such unjust use of social opprobrium is referred to as “political correctness,” and is seen as a dangerous threat.
That’s how you can tell that our society is unjust, by the way.
The use of social opprobrium against powerful people who are actively harming others, or who are tacitly supporting such harm, is very very very appropriate.
We should do it all the time.
Not because we are vindictive. Because it works.
Powerful people are terrified of its application against themselves, and you can tell by their reaction to just a little bit of it.
I suspect the reason you hear overprivileged people making the point that social opprobrium doesn’t work, is they know it works so amazingly well.
The Republican Party has fully embraced white supremacy and every form of bigotry in service of greed. Their embrace of a would-be tyrant threatens global stability, and their wilfull denial of climate change threatens human existence
We should tell them that every chance we get
All these emboldened racists didn’t suddenly become racist. They’ve been quietly racist whole time. They feared the social cost. Now they don’t, is what they’ve been telling us.
It hurts to be shunned.
Good.
I grew up in a time when the racists had to wear hoods when they went out in public, and those who opposed them didn’t have to.
A trend from inappropriate to appropriate social opprobrium did that.
I don’t like the reversal. Do you?
Shout at the bastards in public.
White people, even impoverished white people, access privilege when using racist social opprobrium against black people, even wealthy black people. That’s the appeal of Trump to racist impoverished white people.
I have no idea about Antifa and a “mail guy.”
Just in case it’s not clear, the “appropriate” in the first sentence should be “inappropriate.”
To those who scold that we mustn’t assume evil intentions into the actions of people who consistently pursue absolute evil with steadfast dedication and unshakable resolve: yes, we should.
I guess the ultimate answer to "you don't know what their true motivations are" is "who gives a shit what their motivations are?"
I care *that* you want to burn down my house. I only care *why* you want to burn down my house to the extent it helps me stop you.
Father: *strangles my brother*
Me: help help my father is murdering my brother
Centrist Cousin: it’s that sort of us vs them thinking that’s tearing this family apart
Me: no look literally he’s murdering my brother right in front of us
Centrist Cousin: he’s never going to want to stop if you keep vilifying him with overheated black and white language; I’ve engaged many stranglers and learned a lot about the complexities
Brother: gkkk gkk gk
Me: Look he’s about to die, for real; I really think we just need to stop my dad from killing him right now
Centrist Cousin: that’s exactly the sort of judgemental escalating bad thinking on our side that we need to criticize, I refuse to let myself become just as bad as he is
To be clear, that's any Republicans at any level for any position at any time, and honestly we may want to expand that to include Democrats willing to work with Republicans.
Shut the whole party down, out, and over.
If you want to live in a modern enlightened society and you vote for Republicans, no you don't.
As a Wordle pro on the tour, I feel I should share the best starting word, which all the pros know.
(My own personal favorite starting word is COCCYX, but if I show amateurs how to guess 6-letter words I will be banned from the Wordle Pro Tour and forced to sit next to Bret Stephens in the NYT cafeteria.)
Wordle is a game of constantly shifting strategy; I recommend you get the latest version of my strategy compendium, v14.
Specifically with this order. The one that exists. This reality. The way our systems and laws are set up, the way they’re codified and the way they’re operationalized. What they claim to intend to do, and what they actually do.
“The way things are,” in other words.
Let’s think of conservatism as being, in its essence, an orientation that desires to keep the existing order just as it is, or to make slow and deliberate calculated minor adjustments, to the existing order.
In BREAKFAST AT TIFFANY’S, Mickey Rooney played I. Y. Yunioshi, dressed up in buck teeth and a cartoon squint, a grotesque caricature of a Japanese person.
So I suppose in that sense “you wouldn’t be able” to make BREAKFAST AT TIFFANY’S today.
Which seems somehow preferable.
Now: what interests me is what it means to say *you can’t* make BREAKFAST AT TIFFANY’S these days.
It doesn’t mean you CAN’T. Unlike teaching, say,The Bluest Eye to Texas schoolchildren, there exist no laws to prevent Will Ferrell from putting in the teeth and playing Yunioshi.
So actually you *can* make BREAKFAST AT TIFFANY’S today, I.Y. Yunioshi and all, and throw in Long Duc Dong if you want.
You can if you want wear blackface and dance around in white gloves, like Fred Astaire in SWING TIME, if you want to.