And to separate intended victims from unthreatened allies.
Now imagine you have an enemy. Let’s call your enemy Bart B. Oilingwater.
There is a commercial for Pepsi.
How are we feeling about Rick?
Who would treat your abuse as an abstraction to discuss.
They don’t have ideas, as such. They have intentions.
Which was the point.
Each time the people you're debating *about* have to listen as they become more abstract.
Again. The idea of the lie is entering the public consciousness.
Remember this, whenever anyone stands in front of a crowd and mourns the disagreement, rather than the cause, and fails even to consider the victims.
But I *do* know what free speech is and is not, so I got that going for me.
We're not going to work it out. We're going to oppose it.
There's nothing to debate.