Hi Mollie, you do realize that this slickly worded tweet hides the fact that Clinton had no idea who was doing her opposition research or how, right? And that it also hides that the FBI-partner MI6 agent ("foreign spy," lol) doing the research didn't know who he was doing it for?
2/ I suppose you also know, @MZHemingway—because you're careful—that Steele wasn't hired to find "dirt," that he used MI6-derived sources, and that he didn't give anything to the media until federal law enforcement began hiding evidence of Trump's treachery from Americans, right?
3/ And certainly you know, @MZHemingway—because you're a pro—that a criminal investigation isn't a "[political] weapon [against Republicans]" when it's repeatedly passed standard-of-proof checks by Republican jurists, Republican law enforcement officers, and Republican attorneys?
4/ That tweet by @MZHemingway—amplified by Kremlin apologists like Greenwald—is slick propaganda that doesn't track with the facts as testified to under oath by a large number of Republican officials and civilians. No wonder Trump Jr—who'll be charged eventually—is retweeting it.
5/ Steele waited months for federal law enforcement (who he saw as longtime allies and partners) to take action on the information he gave, and spoke to media only after he saw disinformation coming out. He's a whistle-blower in that respect—something Greenwald should understand.
6/ Republicans hired Fusion GPS to investigate Trump's business dealings abroad because of Trump's *own opacity* and *own statements* on the question. Fusion GPS told Steele "find what you find"—there was no focus on dirt. Then: Clinton → DNC → Perkins Boie → Fusion → Steele.
7/ As the foregoing confirms, *every word* of that tweet by @MZHemingway is intended as propaganda. It cuts out major players; assigns motives; mischaracterizes actions; and leaves out veritable *realms* of explanatory information that would render the tweet a risible *nonsense*.
8/ Had Trump *released his tax returns like everyone else*, and had he not had an *insane unilaterally pro-Russia sanctions policy*, and had he not *spent a lifetime lying about his business dealings and specifically Russian ones*, Fusion wouldn't have been hired *by GOP pols*.
9/ That someone who works for @FDRLST would so devoutly work to assist a career criminal in covering up his crimes—the old ones against working-class contractors, the new ones against America—underscores that the "intellectual right" no longer has credibility on criminal justice.
10/ At this point the Republican Party proper is an oppo-research machine charged with pumping out fact-averse propaganda to give cover to a traitorous career criminal. Anyone in the establishment GOP apparatus who wants to remain a patriot should consider getting out *now*. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Imagine being a 42 year-old pleading with a known pedophilic sex criminal to fly you to his island so you can party with girls he assures you will be 25 or younger.
Then imagine lying about it to hundreds of millions. Even after your lies are caught.
You don't hate Elon enough.
Instead of saying—as honor demands—"I made horrible mistakes for which there's no excuse, I'll take time away from public life to reflect on them," he's kept lying, attacked media, tried to distract, and obscenely said he worked harder than Epstein's victims to get the Files out.
Now imagine that this happens during the same 12-month period this man gleefully—without having any idea what he was doing, or even *caring* if he had any idea—cut a massive foreign aid program whose erasure is projected to cause *more than 10 million deaths* in the years ahead.
This major report on the Greg Bovino-to-Tom Homan handover in Minneapolis at once reveals that the Trump regime hasn’t changed its plans for ICE *and* serves as a primer on the many aspects of the criminal justice system Homan lied about today.
It can't be sufficiently emphasized that the Trump regime has at all points lied about every aspect of its immigration agenda, every aspect of how immigration enforcement works and every aspect of the justice system that touches upon immigration enforcement.
It's all a long con.
No one is saying that every American must understand the justice system.
That would be ideal, but it's impractical.
The problem is that our justice system lies at the center of our politics—which means ignorance about how it works is ripe for abuse by an authoritarian regime.
I shouldn't even have to say this, but precisely *no one* in the independent journalism sphere is saying that Trump can *legally* cancel the midterms.
So corporate media should put on its thinking cap and ask themselves what independent journalists *are* saying.
Yes.... *that*.
It's Month 1 of a 10-month plan and they're already illegally invading countries, illegally occupying U.S. cities, posting Nazi memes from government accounts almost daily, and publicly saying there should be no elections anymore. You think their plan is to do *anything* legally?
So I've no idea why corporate media keeps sanctimoniously reminding us of something we already know—that Trump can't *legally* cancel elections. Because that's not where the debate or mystery is now. The question is whether he thinks he can wait until 2028 to declare martial law.
The question media should be asking: if Minneapolis only needs 600 police officers to perform all general law enforcement activities in the city, why did Trump send 3,000 federal agents to execute a statutorily and constitutionally *much* smaller task?
Answer? He wanted a *war*.
Based on the size of the task and authority ICE actually has—merely executing judicial warrants for already-identified undocumented persons—we'd expect an ICE "surge" in Minneapolis to be about 100 agents.
Trump sent *30 times that*.
Because he wants to declare an insurrection.
So if you're an American paying only small attention to Minneapolis and wondering why things are crazy there, imagine *your* town being the target of an *unprecedented* federal op.
Big deal, right?
Now imagine the feds sending *30 times* too many men—most *virtually untrained*.
(🧵) THREAD: There’s no purpose in debating Trump supporters on Venezuela. They lack the background to participate in a coherent conversation. Do they know Trump is backing a socialist despot over a capitalist who won the 2024 election by 34 points? No.
It gets worse from there.
1/ People without principles, like MAGAs, desperately alight on random anecdotes to try to “prove” points—as they don’t know how to *actually* prove a point, make an argument, hold a consistent position, marshal evidence, or maintain logical throughlines across diverse scenarios.
2/ So for instance, they’ll tell you that the justness of what Trump did is “proven” by how some Venezuelans reacted to it. But these are the same folks whose political ideology has long been grounded in denying international law and the sovereignty or interests of other nations.
As detailed in 2020 bestseller Proof of Corruption, Trump used Erik Prince, Rudy Giuliani and a megadonor to launch clandestine negotiations in Venezuela that would've effectuated some version of the deal. America is being lied to every which way.
What the NYT-bestselling Proof Series has shown—across 2,500 pages and over 15,000 reliable major media citations from around the world—is that what we think of as many different scandals is *one* scandal: the Trump-Russia Scandal. Ukraine, Israel, KSA, Venezuela... even Epstein.
The Trump-Russia Scandal, as a research topic, is so vast—it covers so many continents, decades, and scandals in various nations—that we can analogize being a scholar of it to being a scholar of the Cold War or the Gilded Age.
We keep speaking of trees without seeing the forest.