Steele is clearly advocating on behalf of Deripaska during several conversations.
Specifically in the initial emails.
On July 1, 2016 the focus shifts to Trump – and timing of Ohr/Steele contact centers around ongoing Dossier Memo production by Steele.
6) Cont:
Simpson has contact w/Ohr on August 22, 2016 – in contrast w/Congressional testimony.
Multiple contacts occur on October 18-19, 2016 – email, Skype, calls.
Nellie Ohr joined Fusion GPS somewhere around March 2016.
7) January 12-February 21, 2016 - Several conversations re: Deripaska.
Steele is lobbying on Deripaska's behalf.
See article for details.
8) March 17 20016 – Steele sends email asking if Ohr has any update on plans to visit Europe “in the near term where we could meet up.”
Ohr says no. Offers call. Unclear if call occurred.
9) July 1 2016 – Apparent first mention of Candidate-Trump:
Steele: I am seeing [redacted] in London next week to discuss ongoing business but there is something separate I wanted to discuss with you informally and separately. It concerns our favourite business tycoon!
10) In addition to the Trump reference, Steele is probably referring to a meeting with FBI Agent Mike Gaeta in London on July 5, 2016.
See attached for notable events during this period.
11) July 29 2016 – Steele: [I’ll] be in DC at short notice on business.
See attached for notable events during this period.
12) July 30 2016 – A breakfast meeting between Steel and Bruce & Nellie Ohr takes place.
Notable events around this period – same as July 29, 2016 PLUS:
13) August 22 2016 -Ohr receives email from Fusion GPS’ Glenn Simpson:
Simpson: Can u ring.
Ohr’s log lists contact with Simpson. Notably Simpson told Congress he had no contact with Ohr until after Thanksgiving 2016 – and the election.
Notable events around this period:
14) September 16 2016 – Steele: [I’ll be in Washington soon] on business of mutual interest.
September 21 2016 – Steele: Keen to meet up with you after my scheduled meetings.
September 23 2016 – Steele and Ohr have a breakfast meeting in Washington.
Notable events:
15) October 18 2016 – Steele: If you are in Washington today, I have something quite urgent I would like to discuss with you, preferably by Skype (even before work if you can).
A Skype call takes place immediately following the email.
A 2nd Skype call is had. Calls on 10/19
16) November 21 2016 – Ohr receives email from Kathleen Kavalec, Dep Asst Secretary of State – Bureau of European Affairs:
Kavalec sent Ohr information on Simon Kukes.
Kavalec references connection to Serge Millian.
Millian is reported to be Source D and E in the Dossier.
17) December 12 2016 – Per Ohr’s phone log:
Ohr: Glenn Simpson. Some more news. Spoke with him.
Notable events around this period:
18) January 20 2017 – Email from Simpson:
Simpson: Can you call me please?
Notable events around this period:
19) There was quite a bit swirling around these conversations.
For a description of involved parties:
Bruce Ohr
Christopher Steele
Glenn Simpson
Oleg Deripaska
Adam Waldman
Paul Hauser
Kathleen Kavalec
Nellie Ohr
Sergei Millian
On July 23, 2023, Eisen published a far longer 264 page report, titled "Trump on Trial: A Model Prosecution Memo for Federal Election Interference Crimes Second Edition" justsecurity.org/wp-content/upl…
Eisen: This model prosecution memorandum (or “pros memo”) assesses federal charges Special Counsel Jack Smith may bring against former President Donald Trump for alleged criminal interference in the 2020 election.
Solomon went to WH on evening of Jan 19, 2021 where he reviewed docs.
Plan was to fully disseminate to public on morning of the 20th.
But Solomon received a call late that night from someone w/in WH asking for their return for "additional redactions."
Here's what happened next
"On his initiative and without the President’s knowledge or consent, one of the President’s subordinates decided that redactions consistent with the standards of the Privacy Act should be applied to the binder before it was publicly released, the Office of Legal Counsel’s opinion notwithstanding."
We know from an email sent by George Kent, deputy chief of mission in Kyiv, that a $7mm bribe was paid to the office of Ukrainian chief prosecutor Vitaly Yarema some time in latter part of 2014.
Yarema's office issued a Dec 25, 2014 letter to the UK Courts - who had been investigating Zlochevsky - stating there was no longer an active Ukraine investigation into Zlochevsky.
This letter forced the UK Court to drop case.
Yarema and his staff were fired ~one month later.
Yarema's replacement was Viktor Shokin - who reopened the Ukraine investigation into Zlochevsky & Burisma.
At the time of the bribe, Hunter was — per Burisma — in charge of Burisma’s legal affairs. docs.house.gov/meetings/JU/JU…
Two days after Joe Biden's newly disclosed Dec 4, 2015 conference call w/Hunter & Burisma owner Zlochevsky, Biden's staff crafted answers to potential questions Joe might get re: Hunter's involvement w/Burisma
One of those questions:
Do you think Zlochevsky is corrupt?
Biden's defenders like @RepDanGoldman have claimed Joe Biden didn't know these individuals - or anything about them.
But Geoffrey Pyatt, US Ambassador to Ukraine wrote to Biden's staff on Dec 6, 2015, "I assume all have the DoJ background on Zlochevsky."
It's beyond any doubt that Joe Biden knew exactly who Zlochevsky was - and the significance of participating in a conference call w/Zlochevsky.
Biden's staff was obviously worried - and it's unlikely they even knew of the conference call w/Zlochevsky less than two days prior.
Here, Kent describes UK Investigation - and how it ended in late Dec 2014 because Yarema told UK Courts "there was no active case open on Zlochevsky"
Kent also mentions the $7mm bribe paid to Yarema's office.
Yarema resigned shortly after on Feb 9, 2015. Shokin replaced him.
There's another big problem as well. Goldman makes crazy claim that Shokin was an asset to Burisma - therefore Joe Biden's actions to fire Shokin ran counter to Burisma's interests:
"as Goldman articulated it...Shokin’s ouster put Burisma and Zlochevsky at more risk, not less."
2) Most are familiar w/sequence of events leading to the firing of Ukrainian prosecutor Víctor Shokin - as the direct result of political and financial pressure from then-VP Joe Biden.
This thread, which focuses on Shokin timeline, is a good refresher: