(Thread) Collusion doesn’t describe what happened.

Ideas from Yale Prof. Snyder’s book & 5-12 lecture available here:

Spoiler: Collusion doesn't describe how “the Russians elevated Trump to the office of the presidency.” (Snyder's words)
1/ Trump's repeated use of the word “collusion” is a deliberate ploy to draw us away from what actually happened and create a fiction.

In fact, Trump was a tool and a tactic.
The Russians had a strategy and a plan.

The strategy was to turn the U.S. into a country like Russia.
2/ People ask: Could Trump have succeeded without Russian help?

Snyder's answer: Without Russian money propping up Trump and helping him pretend he was a successful businessman, there would never have been Trump the Public Figure to run for president in the first place.
3/ Trump was a failed businessman, but he was good at pretending to be a successful businessman.

Trump is good at lying, and creating crisis and spectacle—exactly the qualities for the perfect leader of a Russian United States.

What does Snyder mean?👇
4/ When Trump announced his candidacy, people marveled that he didn’t have a traditional campaign.

He didn’t need one! He had Russia behind him, hacking & leaking emails, figuring out internet strategies for frightening and motivating Americans via social media, etc.
5/ Example: For a very brief time after the Access Hollywood Tape was released, people thought Trump’s campaign was over.

Within a half hour after the tape was released, Russians, their bots, and helpers, went energetically to work.
6/They spread fictions like “Hillary is a pimp who sells sex with children" & "Podesta participates in weird rituals . . ." etc.

These fictions surrounded and eclipsed the Access Hollywood Tape.

From an American point of view, it was chaos & confusion. Nobody could focus.
7/ From the Russian point of view, the chaos worked. Trump’s candidacy survived.

As Russia saw the situation: They had Trump’s back and were taking care of him.

Public opinion polls favored Clinton.
Russia favored Trump.
Russia won.
8/ Trump is always saying "no collusion."

It's a deliberate strategy that accomplishes two goals.
First, it keeps people from talking about actual crimes that happened like conspiracy, tax evasion, etc.

If you're still saying "What crimes?" see👇
9/ Or see👇 to name two.

The second goal was to create a fiction to mask what actually happened.

Collusion implies two equal partners working together.

What happened was: The campaign that elected Trump wasn’t his.
Trump just went along for the ride.
10/ Trump's part was to create spectacle, turn politics into Reality TV, tell outrageous and create the kind of chaos that covers truth.

Trump was merely an instrument.

He was the payload of a Russian cyber weapon.

The payload doesn’t collude. The payload simply does damage.
*tell outrageous LIES.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

Feb 21
Putin knows how to wield disinformation and he knows that the United States is divided: A large portion of the population, including the most influential voices from a major political party, want the United States to emulate his Russia.

1/
Some background:

After Russia enacted anti-homosexual legislation, Pat Buchanan said Putin was “entering a claim that Moscow is the Godly city of today" because he was stamping out western evils like easy divorce and homosexuality.
buchanan.org/blog/whose-sid…

2/
British right-winger Katie Hopkins, in an article in which she was interviewed with her friend Ann Coulter, said “Putin rocks.”

Katie Hopkins then went on to praise Russia as being “untouched by the myth of multiculturalism and deranged diversity."

rt.com/uk/429777-kati…

3/
Read 4 tweets
Feb 18
Trump lost in court THREE MORE TIMES today.

Trump tried to get all three of these cases⤵️ dismissed and lost. I analyzed one of the cases last April, Blassingame, here: (Transcript on my blog.)

He tends not to do well in court, where facts matter.

1/
The defendants made the following arguments (screenshot #1)

Trump also claims, among other things, that he has absolute immunity. (#2)

It turns out that the absolute immunity question isn't as easy as you might think (but Trump still lost).

2/
If you want to get caught up on one of the cases, my analysis from last April is here:terikanefield.com/blassingame-v-…

And here:

You can read the court's decision here: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

3/
Read 8 tweets
Feb 16
Um . . . this isn't the defense Trump thinks it is.

Trump published a letter he received from Mazars dated (it looks like) 2014. He then summarized the letter.

#1: What Mazars said
#2: What Trump says Mazars said

Me = 🤦‍♀️

Does he think nobody can or will actually read it?
Mazars said, "Trump is responsible for preparing the financial statement."

Also Mazars does not "undertake to obtain or provide any assurance that there are no material modifications that should be made . . . "
Trump posts the letter and says Mazars "strongly states that all work was performed in accordance with professional standards and that there were "no material discrepancies in the financial statements."

There is no "I don't know how to read" defense.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 13
For this week’s blog post, I edited and combined a few of my recent threads.

I started with a reading of the newly unredacted sections of the Mueller report, then talked about some of the responses on Twitter . . .

terikanefield.com/is-social-medi…
. . . and concluded with thoughts about how social media brings out authoritarian instincts in large swaths of people who ordinarily would not be given to authoritarian impulses.



It's too easy for truth to lose, and when truth loses, democracy loses.
Right. And not all "manipulators" are bad actors, but all people need to learn to evaluate sources.

Reflectively saying, "Professor X should know" is not how to do it. It takes more work. Falling in line is always easier than doing the work.

Read 4 tweets
Feb 12
I'm tired of the word "accountable." It's a weasel word. Don't say "accountable." Say what you mean.

Does "accountable" mean
🔹Lose elections?
🔹Go to prison?
🔹Lose a lawsuit?
🔹Be hated?

It would be nice if all the good people were rewarded and the bad people punished.
So you want to start indicting people and gather the evidence after they're indicted?

Or not worry about evidence?

There are rules of evidence, which means that the stuff you've read in newspapers and Tweets probably isn't admissible in court . . .
Indicting people and having juries return "not guilty" verdicts because there isn't evidence to prove each element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt may not accomplish what people think it will accomplish.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 12
One reason I think social media is turning everyone into authoritarians: people don't read or think.

They see a headline and have a strong emotional reaction, which they Tweet and which then gets repeated by others, who are also not thinking . . .

1/
Political psychologists like @karen_stenner describe the authoritarian personality.

Those with an authoritarian disposition are averse to complexity. They reject nuance.

They prefer sameness and uniformity and have “cognitive limitations.”

(link in the next Tweet)

2/
See for example, "Authoritarianism is not a momentary madness,” which originally appeared in this book, an dwhich Stenner has now made available free on her website, here: ……e-4700-aaa9-743a55a9437a.filesusr.com/ugd/02ff25_370…

Timothy Snyder also talks about the danger of what he calls Internet Memes.

3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(