(Thread) Collusion doesn’t describe what happened.
Ideas from Yale Prof. Snyder’s book & 5-12 lecture available here:
Spoiler: Collusion doesn't describe how “the Russians elevated Trump to the office of the presidency.” (Snyder's words)
1/ Trump's repeated use of the word “collusion” is a deliberate ploy to draw us away from what actually happened and create a fiction.
In fact, Trump was a tool and a tactic.
The Russians had a strategy and a plan.
The strategy was to turn the U.S. into a country like Russia.
2/ People ask: Could Trump have succeeded without Russian help?
Snyder's answer: Without Russian money propping up Trump and helping him pretend he was a successful businessman, there would never have been Trump the Public Figure to run for president in the first place.
3/ Trump was a failed businessman, but he was good at pretending to be a successful businessman.
Trump is good at lying, and creating crisis and spectacle—exactly the qualities for the perfect leader of a Russian United States.
4/ When Trump announced his candidacy, people marveled that he didn’t have a traditional campaign.
He didn’t need one! He had Russia behind him, hacking & leaking emails, figuring out internet strategies for frightening and motivating Americans via social media, etc.
5/ Example: For a very brief time after the Access Hollywood Tape was released, people thought Trump’s campaign was over.
Within a half hour after the tape was released, Russians, their bots, and helpers, went energetically to work.
6/They spread fictions like “Hillary is a pimp who sells sex with children" & "Podesta participates in weird rituals . . ." etc.
These fictions surrounded and eclipsed the Access Hollywood Tape.
From an American point of view, it was chaos & confusion. Nobody could focus.
7/ From the Russian point of view, the chaos worked. Trump’s candidacy survived.
As Russia saw the situation: They had Trump’s back and were taking care of him.
Public opinion polls favored Clinton.
Russia favored Trump.
Russia won.
8/ Trump is always saying "no collusion."
It's a deliberate strategy that accomplishes two goals.
First, it keeps people from talking about actual crimes that happened like conspiracy, tax evasion, etc.
Putin knows how to wield disinformation and he knows that the United States is divided: A large portion of the population, including the most influential voices from a major political party, want the United States to emulate his Russia.
After Russia enacted anti-homosexual legislation, Pat Buchanan said Putin was “entering a claim that Moscow is the Godly city of today" because he was stamping out western evils like easy divorce and homosexuality. buchanan.org/blog/whose-sid…
2/
British right-winger Katie Hopkins, in an article in which she was interviewed with her friend Ann Coulter, said “Putin rocks.”
Katie Hopkins then went on to praise Russia as being “untouched by the myth of multiculturalism and deranged diversity."
Um . . . this isn't the defense Trump thinks it is.
Trump published a letter he received from Mazars dated (it looks like) 2014. He then summarized the letter.
#1: What Mazars said
#2: What Trump says Mazars said
Me = 🤦♀️
Does he think nobody can or will actually read it?
Mazars said, "Trump is responsible for preparing the financial statement."
Also Mazars does not "undertake to obtain or provide any assurance that there are no material modifications that should be made . . . "
Trump posts the letter and says Mazars "strongly states that all work was performed in accordance with professional standards and that there were "no material discrepancies in the financial statements."
. . . and concluded with thoughts about how social media brings out authoritarian instincts in large swaths of people who ordinarily would not be given to authoritarian impulses.
Indicting people and having juries return "not guilty" verdicts because there isn't evidence to prove each element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt may not accomplish what people think it will accomplish.
One reason I think social media is turning everyone into authoritarians: people don't read or think.
They see a headline and have a strong emotional reaction, which they Tweet and which then gets repeated by others, who are also not thinking . . .
1/
Political psychologists like @karen_stenner describe the authoritarian personality.
Those with an authoritarian disposition are averse to complexity. They reject nuance.
They prefer sameness and uniformity and have “cognitive limitations.”
(link in the next Tweet)
2/
See for example, "Authoritarianism is not a momentary madness,” which originally appeared in this book, an dwhich Stenner has now made available free on her website, here: ……e-4700-aaa9-743a55a9437a.filesusr.com/ugd/02ff25_370…
Timothy Snyder also talks about the danger of what he calls Internet Memes.