(Thread) In the choice between Putin-style oligarchy and liberal democracy (⤵️) the Trump GOP has chosen Putin.

Now, why would they do that?

I’ll give you 6 reasons. Then I’ll offer a suggestion from a CSIS report about what we can do about it.
1/ Reason #1: Russian money. Lots of it.

Here are 3 examples (of many):

As per a senate report, Russia funneled money to the Trump campaign through the NRA: feinstein.senate.gov/public/_cache/…
Russian oligarch Vekselberg gave Michael Cohen $500K in 2016:
nytimes.com/2018/05/08/us/…
2/ And of course, the Russians bought and paid for Trump:
threadreaderapp.com/thread/1042072…

Reason #2: Power.
To retain power, the GOP must coverup how Russia helped elect Trump.
Also, to retain power, the NRA, Trump, and the GOP need Russian money (See Reason #1)
3/ Reason #3: Many in the GOP prefer oligarchy and autocracy as a form of government.

Representative Democracy is difficult, requiring compromise & give and take. It's slow moving (run for your local city council and try to get something done if you haven't experienced it).
4/ Autocracy is more efficient. Change happens swiftly and easily.

The GOP believes ideological purity means rejecting compromise.
‘My way or else,” isn’t democracy, it’s authoritarianism.

For more on the GOP's shift to authoritarianism, see👇
5/ Reason #4: Putin’s Russia is a white majority, anti-homosexual patriarchy.

America, prior to 1920 was a white majority, anti-homosexual patriarchy.
There was enormous income inequality before the New Deal. About 5% of families could afford to send their children to college.
6/ No income taxes and no minimum wage meant people with money lived like kings and everyone else toiled long days without hope of economic advancement.

Which is exactly how things are now in Russia.

Which is also exactly what GOP policies are aiming for.
7/ Reason #5 (this one overlaps with #4) They admire Russia for being “untouched by the myth of cultural multiculturalism and deranged diversity,”👇
rt.com/uk/429777-kati…

Reason #6: Many are fooled by Russian propaganda.

They think liberals are more dangerous than Putin . . .
8/ And they don’t understand what it’s like for the masses with no hope for economic advancement (unless one of the oligarchs bestows generosity).

Newsflash to NRA folks: You won’t get to keep your guns in Putin’s America. Once oligarchy's in place, you'll no longer be useful.
9/ So what can we do?

The Center for Strategic International Studies issued a report on how to counter Russian attacks on democracy.

The conclusion is on p. 11: One of “the most effective countermeasures is to increase public resilience against. . .
csis.org/analysis/count…
10/ . . .the kind of techniques used by Russia.”

How? By “increasing public understanding of the threat” and "strengthening our commitment to democratic institutions.”

If you've canvassed for a campaign, you know the strategy:
Talk to people who lean toward your views.
11/ Don’t try to convert MAGA people. You’re unlikely to do so, and they'll wear you out.

I think Twitter MAGA trolls are trying to pull us into arguments so we won't have energy to be productive.

Find people who lean Democratic, but feel discouraged, frustrated or apathetic.
12/ If they feel frustrated that “nothing is being done," explain that due process—like democracy—is slow and laborious, but the alternative is tyranny.

Dictatorship is easy. “My way or you go to jail (or die),” gets things done quickly—but we don’t want that.
13/ I think what the CSIS report meant by “strengthen a sense of shared narrative around the value and importance of our democratic institutions” is this:

We need to help everyone fall back in love with representative government, even with its flaws. We’ll miss it if it’s gone.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

Feb 21
Putin knows how to wield disinformation and he knows that the United States is divided: A large portion of the population, including the most influential voices from a major political party, want the United States to emulate his Russia.

1/
Some background:

After Russia enacted anti-homosexual legislation, Pat Buchanan said Putin was “entering a claim that Moscow is the Godly city of today" because he was stamping out western evils like easy divorce and homosexuality.
buchanan.org/blog/whose-sid…

2/
British right-winger Katie Hopkins, in an article in which she was interviewed with her friend Ann Coulter, said “Putin rocks.”

Katie Hopkins then went on to praise Russia as being “untouched by the myth of multiculturalism and deranged diversity."

rt.com/uk/429777-kati…

3/
Read 4 tweets
Feb 18
Trump lost in court THREE MORE TIMES today.

Trump tried to get all three of these cases⤵️ dismissed and lost. I analyzed one of the cases last April, Blassingame, here: (Transcript on my blog.)

He tends not to do well in court, where facts matter.

1/
The defendants made the following arguments (screenshot #1)

Trump also claims, among other things, that he has absolute immunity. (#2)

It turns out that the absolute immunity question isn't as easy as you might think (but Trump still lost).

2/
If you want to get caught up on one of the cases, my analysis from last April is here:terikanefield.com/blassingame-v-…

And here:

You can read the court's decision here: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…

3/
Read 8 tweets
Feb 16
Um . . . this isn't the defense Trump thinks it is.

Trump published a letter he received from Mazars dated (it looks like) 2014. He then summarized the letter.

#1: What Mazars said
#2: What Trump says Mazars said

Me = 🤦‍♀️

Does he think nobody can or will actually read it?
Mazars said, "Trump is responsible for preparing the financial statement."

Also Mazars does not "undertake to obtain or provide any assurance that there are no material modifications that should be made . . . "
Trump posts the letter and says Mazars "strongly states that all work was performed in accordance with professional standards and that there were "no material discrepancies in the financial statements."

There is no "I don't know how to read" defense.
Read 7 tweets
Feb 13
For this week’s blog post, I edited and combined a few of my recent threads.

I started with a reading of the newly unredacted sections of the Mueller report, then talked about some of the responses on Twitter . . .

terikanefield.com/is-social-medi…
. . . and concluded with thoughts about how social media brings out authoritarian instincts in large swaths of people who ordinarily would not be given to authoritarian impulses.



It's too easy for truth to lose, and when truth loses, democracy loses.
Right. And not all "manipulators" are bad actors, but all people need to learn to evaluate sources.

Reflectively saying, "Professor X should know" is not how to do it. It takes more work. Falling in line is always easier than doing the work.

Read 4 tweets
Feb 12
I'm tired of the word "accountable." It's a weasel word. Don't say "accountable." Say what you mean.

Does "accountable" mean
🔹Lose elections?
🔹Go to prison?
🔹Lose a lawsuit?
🔹Be hated?

It would be nice if all the good people were rewarded and the bad people punished.
So you want to start indicting people and gather the evidence after they're indicted?

Or not worry about evidence?

There are rules of evidence, which means that the stuff you've read in newspapers and Tweets probably isn't admissible in court . . .
Indicting people and having juries return "not guilty" verdicts because there isn't evidence to prove each element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt may not accomplish what people think it will accomplish.
Read 10 tweets
Feb 12
One reason I think social media is turning everyone into authoritarians: people don't read or think.

They see a headline and have a strong emotional reaction, which they Tweet and which then gets repeated by others, who are also not thinking . . .

1/
Political psychologists like @karen_stenner describe the authoritarian personality.

Those with an authoritarian disposition are averse to complexity. They reject nuance.

They prefer sameness and uniformity and have “cognitive limitations.”

(link in the next Tweet)

2/
See for example, "Authoritarianism is not a momentary madness,” which originally appeared in this book, an dwhich Stenner has now made available free on her website, here: ……e-4700-aaa9-743a55a9437a.filesusr.com/ugd/02ff25_370…

Timothy Snyder also talks about the danger of what he calls Internet Memes.

3/
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(