Teri Kanefield Profile picture
Sep 25, 2018 15 tweets 4 min read Read on X
(Thread) The Cultural War

@stucam7771 asks why the GOP insists on Kavanaugh, despite credible allegations of sexual assault.

🙋‍♀️🙋‍♀️I have an explanation for why Trump is digging in.

He WANTS this to be a cultural war.
2/ Think back. Past GOP nominees moved right during the primaries to appeal to the “base,” and then moved to the center.

Trump never moved to the center. After his “Mexico . . they’re rapists” speech—he shocked everyone (even more) by doubling down.
washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/w…
3/ Doubling down on "Mexicans are rapists" was the first sign that we were in unchartered waters: Trump has no interest in being everyone's president.

Doubling down on whatever shocks liberals has been Trump’s strategy ever since.

Because he wants his hardcore base fired up.
4/ After WWII, Nazism fell into disrepute. The KKK was forced underground by an outpouring of disgust.

Imagine how ecstatic the neo-Nazis / KKK are now to have a candidate of their own in the White House.
They’ll follow him to the ends of the earth! They’ll help spread his lies!
5/ Not all Trump supporters are white supremacists, of course.

Many are victims of top notch propaganda. Others don’t understand what Trump stands for. Some aren't paying attention.

But the more liberals dislike Kavanaugh, the more Trump will want to dig in.
6/ Kavanaugh—a SCOTUS nominee who is supposed to be impartial (he’s not running for office)—made an ‘exclusive’ appearance on Fox, a partisan news outlet. He's trying his case in the Court of Public Opinion.

Actually, worse: The Court of Fox Opinion.
7/ But holding on to Kavanaugh will cost the GOP “decent female” voters, @stucam7771 says.

Trump doesn’t WANT those voters, because if he woos liberals, he’ll lose the part of his base that hates liberals.

Remember: they think liberals are the enemy.
8/ Besides, at this point he can’t win over the liberals or the moderates. He lost them a long time ago.

“But he doesn’t have anywhere near majority support!” you say.

He doesn’t need a majority. He’s already in the White House.
9/ “What about Mueller?” you ask. Doesn't he want K. to protect him from Mueller?

Certainly K's views are part of it—but not all. He's not the only judge with these views.

Moreover, Trump believes the only tribunal he will face is in the Senate.
10/ Remember: impeachment requires a majority of the House, but removal takes 2/3 of the Senate—such a high bar that no president has ever been removed.

And senate trials are held mostly in the Court of Public Opinion—a fight Trump is ready for with his well-oiled media loop.
11/ Another reason he doesn't need a majority: authoritarians are better organized than liberals.
They fall in line.
They can be dangerous.
In the past, authoritarians were spread out over both parties. Now they're all in the GOP. (What do I mean? See👇)
12/ The Trump-GOP strategy: Keep the radicalized base fired up & play dirty. Cheat. Lie.

From👇Strongmen assault the laws & democratic norms until they crumble. Citizens become numb to the battering and often don’t know the democratic norms have crumbled until it is too late.
13/ A chilling statistic: Hitler came to power with 33% of the vote, and then battered the democratic institutions until they crumbled.

Don't get too alarmed by the comparison: Germany was an imperial government until 1918, so democratic institutions weren't firmly rooted.
14/ We’re either witnessing the last stand of white male dominance, or America returns to the 1920s.

Will he win? Nah.
Our institutions firmly rooted. And there are way more of us.

But doubling down is Trump’s smartest move.
15 (adding) About today's "Sex War" stuff⤵️

Trump wants a cultural war because:
If enough people like what he's trying to do (i.e., win the 'sex war' for men) they won't mind a few details, like laundering Russian money, finance violations, Russian help in the election, etc.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Teri Kanefield

Teri Kanefield Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Teri_Kanefield

Aug 30
Okay, whew. I've been writing. Some light summer beach reading . . . NOT

I begin with The authoritarian personality, some politics, a story I’ve told before.

I need this because the new stuff requires context, so please stick with me . . .

1/
terikanefield.com/heres-why/
I add new research, new conclusions, and venture into new territory including existence pain and the role of the artist.

Special thanks to @karen_stenner and @LeorZmigrod who helped me pull it together.

Link:

2/ terikanefield.com/heres-why/Image
@karen_stenner @LeorZmigrod also quoted, cited, or critiqued:

Adorno, Theodor
Arendt, Hannah
Chinoy, Sahil
Coleridge, Samuel
Doestoevsky, Fydor
Frenkel-Brunswik, Else
Haidt, Jonathan @JonHaidt
Hand, Learned
Kanai, Ryota
Merritt, Eli
Ledroit, Stephanie . . .

3/
Read 4 tweets
Apr 29, 2024
Everyone will have a different opinion of the strength of the Manhattan criminal case against Trump.

I am offering no opinions on the strength or who will prevail.

I am saying that people are working too hard to explain the case and figure out the legal theory.

1/
The prosecution has everyone confused because they are framing the case as "election fraud" and "election interference" so everyone is trying to connect the crimes we know about to "election fraud."

2/

terikanefield.com/wheres-the-bee…
The legal theory of the case should be clear.

This would be clear: "It is election fraud. Here is how the evidence will support a charge of election fraud." Then show how the behavior supports election fraud.

Does this mean the prosecution will lose? No.

3/
Read 10 tweets
Mar 11, 2024
Finished. (Whew)

As promised, all about Legal pundits and the Outrage Industry, with a few cherished conspiracy theories carefully debunked.

Click here to start:

For years, I was perplexed by what I saw on Twitter. . .

1/ terikanefield.com/can-democracy-…
Image
It seemed to me that the dynamics of social media were making people more authoritarian.

Then I started reading experts in political communication and it all started making sense.


2/ terikanefield.com/can-democracy-…
Image
I wrote parts 1 - 5 in November. I thought I was finished, but I wasn't.

There were still things I didn't understand.

Writers often write to understand, so I kept reading, thinking, and writing.



3/ terikanefield.com/can-democracy-…
Image
Read 5 tweets
Mar 9, 2024
Whew! I finished.



Everything I promised: How to listen (or not listen) to legal pundits.

It's also about what is dangerous about the entire industry of punditry, speculation, and cable talk shows.

1/terikanefield.com/invented-narra…

For years I was perplexed by what I was seeing on left-leaning Twitter, political blogs, and partisan reporting.

I had the feeling that, in its way, what I was seeing was comparable to Fox: Lots of bad information and even unhinged conspiracy theories.
2terikanefield.com/invented-narra…
Of course, if I suggested that, I was blasted for "both-sidesing."

Then I discovered an area of scholarship: Communications and the overlap between communications and political science.

I read these books and light bulbs went on.

3/ Image
Read 11 tweets
Mar 2, 2024
If Trump can win with everything we know about him, what make people think a finding of guilt would change that?

It makes no sense.
Also what if the jury acquits? It can happen.

I do recall the same people thought impeachment and indictment would cause Trump to crumble.
Another contradiction: when people demanded indictments RIGHT NOW (in 2021 and early 2022) the reason was, "Everyone knows he's guilty! Look at all the evidence!"

We saw the J6 committee findings.

Trump isn't saying "I didn't do it." He's saying, "I had the right to do it."

2
We all know what he did. The question is, "Do people want a president who acts like Trump?"

A lot of people do.

People show me polls that a guilty finding would change minds.

I say rubbish. Use common sense. He lost in 2020 and he lost the popular vote in 2016. . .

3/
Read 6 tweets
Feb 29, 2024
The news takes 2 minutes to convey.

"Here is what the court did." That is news.

Listening to people speculate about why the court did it and what it means is not news.

It is entertainment.

But it is a special kind of entertainment.

1/
. . . because it is designed to keep people hooked. People need to stay glued to the screen for hour after hour.

But to hook people, you need to scare them. The Facebook whistleblower testified that content that produces strong emotions like anger gets more engagement.

2/
Fox does the same thing. There is a few minutes of news, but the facts get lost as commentators and TV personalities speculate and scare their audiences.

Before you yell at me for comparing MSNBC to FOX, read all of this:

3/terikanefield.com/can-democracy-…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(