.@CarolMillerWV, running against @Ojeda4congress, has been late on her property taxes atleast 78 times, including in 2017. She's worth more than $10 million, so the explanation is not that she can't afford it. Her campaign didn't get back to me, but here's what I think happened/1
According to Cabell County, property taxes are due on July 15. After that it's late, but if you don't pay by Oct. 1, they start charging interest. She has paid interest every year since 1998.
If you don't pay by April 30, it's officially delinquent. See '99, '07, '15 and '17 /2
The property tax she has owed over these years, but not paid on time, adds up to some $88,972.29.
The interest that Cabell County charges, though, is 0.75%. That extremely low, and whenever wealthy people have a chance to get cash at that rate, they take it. /3
In other words, Carol Miller has been using the cash-strapped municipal government of Cabell County to extract extremely low-interest loans. It's a version of wealthy welfare, taken at the expense of the county. /4
I count close to $3,000 in interest for being late on her property taxes on her two homes over the years, in exchange for what is effectively a low-interest loan.
@CarolMillerWV says she is running "to cut the bull out of politics." /5
Another fun Harry Reid story: In my book, I reported on how Reid had pressured the White House into repealing Don't Ask Dont Tell during the 2010 lameduck, a huge moment that paved the way for marriage equality.
After I reached Obama's office for comment, Obama called Reid...
Obama urged Reid to clarify what he had told me and say that the two had actually been in lockstep. Reid told him he'd call me. Reid did call, but stuck by his story, which was not that Obama was against repeal, but he was worried it would mess up his START Treaty vote
I told Obama's spokesperson what he had said and she sighed. I offered to talk to him one more time but predicted he'd stick by his story, because I'd seen him do this before (once when Schumer had asked him to call me, and he did, but said the opposite of what Schumer wanted).
Trying to revive the Dunning School version of Reconstruction, in which the Klan are explicitly cast as heroes bringing redemption to the south, is apparently step 2 if this anti-CRT push
Ok, read the full piece, and it’s wildly dishonest and absurd on its face. The lack of effort out into the argument must be a deliberate power move. This, for instance.
As we continue to drift toward authoritarianism, historians will see Biden’s pursuit of Julian Assange as a major stain on his legacy and a contributor toward that authoritarian drift.
For all the people who want to just give up, why don’t you just go ahead and do that? Just give up. That’s fine. The rest of us can keep pushing for Assange’s freedom and pushing against authoritarianism, while you tell everybody the fight is over.
The fact that people are so mad at the economy even as wages and savings account balances are rising and unemployment is falling shows that when people think “economy” they think of the way it’s supposed to serve them as consumers interc.pt/3Exzg1M
Relatedly, when non-union workers get a raise they don’t credit politicians or the Fed for that raise. That should be obvious but it isn’t. When people see higher gas prices, of course, they blame whoever’s in power.
If you prefer to be talked at rather than read here’s the Rising version
> @PramilaJayapal is putting her credibility on the line, trusting these five holdouts to stick to their word, and trusting Biden to get it done. If they break their word, it's devastating for Jayapal and could split the House Dem caucus in two. We should know within two weeks.
Whenever I explain why I believe somebody did something, whether based on reporting or analysis, half my feed gets filled with people thinking I'm therefore defending what the person did. I'm not. With that caveat, which will promptly be ignored, here's my take on the thinking:
Several of the five holdouts would be happy to kill the BBB, but want to do it quietly rather than vote it down on the floor. So the goal then is to make them commit, get them on record. If you vote down the BIF, you give them a chance to do what they want, which is walk away...
The CPC changing course, and now pushing for a vote on both the bipartisan bill and reconciliation before Manchin is on board, feels like a caucus cracking under the threat of being (absurdly) blamed if McAuliffe loses VA /1
Some progressives seem worried that if McAuliffe loses then a spooked Manchin might run for the hills. But from the CPC perspective, that's all the more reason to hold the line, b/c as @AOC has argued, the fossil-heavy BIF without being paired with the other is a net loser
The question is: Do the chances of Manchin supporting the build back better act go up or down if the BIF is passed? There's an argument that he wants it done that way for alpha reasons, so he can prove he wasn't pushed around by a bunch of House members