The CPC changing course, and now pushing for a vote on both the bipartisan bill and reconciliation before Manchin is on board, feels like a caucus cracking under the threat of being (absurdly) blamed if McAuliffe loses VA /1
Some progressives seem worried that if McAuliffe loses then a spooked Manchin might run for the hills. But from the CPC perspective, that's all the more reason to hold the line, b/c as @AOC has argued, the fossil-heavy BIF without being paired with the other is a net loser
The question is: Do the chances of Manchin supporting the build back better act go up or down if the BIF is passed? There's an argument that he wants it done that way for alpha reasons, so he can prove he wasn't pushed around by a bunch of House members

Or he could just kill it
Ilhan Omar, the CPC's whip, tells me: "It’s time to call his bluff, these bills will pass the house and everyone will get to see if Manchin is willing vote it down. It is also time to see if the President [can] get his friend on board and get the votes for his agenda."
If I were going to psychoanalyze Manchin, I'd guess gender roles matter here, too: Whether consciously or not he doesn't want it to look like a bunch of young women got the better of him.

If that's true, giving him the BIF first is actually the way to get it all finished...
It would almost be too on-the-nose if the way Jayapal and the Squad have to get this all done is swallow their pride and let the man think he's leading. Not an unfamiliar situation for women in professional (or any) settings.
Pontificating in public is what I do with this account. I said they cracked under pressure and handed away their leverage. You don’t have to read the thread beyond that if it bothers you

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ryan Grim

Ryan Grim Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ryangrim

1 Nov
The lawyer defending Texas’ abortion law just admitted under probing from (I think?) Breyer that a blue state could pass a bounty law getting around the second amendment with a $1 million bounty for anybody who sells an AR15
And, the lawyer said, the federal courts couldn’t step in, only state courts could.
He added that the gun seller could go to congress if he didn’t like it, but other Justices noted that A) Congress probably wouldn’t help and B) the point of a right is you don’t need Congress. That’s why it’s a right.
Read 4 tweets
28 Oct
Democrats are putting about 20 billion behind a top priority of @sunrisemvmt, their Civilian Climate Corps, but the legislation also throws some of those billions at traditional Americorps, which is causing consternation in the caucus /1
Americorps is a small ($1 billion) program that is poorly managed and doesn't have a ton of support in cities where its active. Some Dems want the DoL to run it instead. I talked to Jamaal Bowman about it in this week's podcast theintercept.com/2021/10/28/dec…
Also asked AOC and Bernie Sanders about it this week and both are supportive of keeping it in Americorps, despite the program's problems.
Read 6 tweets
27 Oct
It’s interesting how people are laser focused on the potential long term harms of the vaccine yet remarkably unconcerned about the long term harms of covid. On both, we simply don’t know, but there’s this weird confidence that the vaccine is obviously more harmful long term.
Like, maybe you’re right, but how do you know that? (You don’t; nobody does.)
It’s the tone of it that gets me, I guess. What must it be like to be so confident about something we by definition don’t know?
Read 4 tweets
26 Oct
Warren, Wyden, and Angus King unveiling their alternative minimum corporate tax that relies on corporate public claims of their profits Image
King estimates it would raise $400 billion over 10 years, noting the share of corporate tax revenue to the government has shrunk by 75% over the last 40 years
Warren says she and King wanted the tax to apply to profits above $100 million, but to get 50 votes they needed to put it at a billion.
Read 8 tweets
16 Oct
Absolutely wild that a guy who literally owns a coal producing business that generates millions for him — currently — can make this kind of decision for the whole country and it’s not illegal
It’s like how you go back and read about how Supreme Court justices in the Gilded Age were owners of train companies they’d rule in favor of
Read 4 tweets
28 Sep
On the Congressional Progressive Caucus conference call today, every member who spoke -- roughly 2 dozen -- said they were committed to opposing the bipartisan bill until reconciliation is ready, per a source. Not one member said they'd vote yes on Thursday.
Two frontliners (means they're in swing seats) argued that anybody who thinks Dems will pass reconciliation if they let BIF go through first are fooling themselves, and that they NEED the reconciliation bill for their re-election. It's filled with popular stuff they can run on.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(