Continuing from that thread: We believe their aims are deeper e.g. see last part of this apolog we wrote last year
Those who have studied the Han ideology and intentions have known that this was going to happen and there have
probably already been many attempts or trials on larger scale in non-human animals and plants.The most interesting thing is the Chinese announcement of their triumph: 1. He (the chIna’s name) is careful in presenting his case in English: clearly he is taking an aim at the Western
audience. 2. He also mentioned right away that they were chIna babies that he had engineered: no shit of science without borders, science knows no nations and all that. 3. He states that he is doing it for AIDS patients who are discriminated against badly and have had no chance
to have a family in “developing countries”. This is again a message to touch the white liberal academia. 4. The names of the gamete donors and the kids born out of the experiment are all western/generic like Grace, Mark, Nana etc. This is again aimed at the mlechCha-s. 5. He
then gives a tailpiece statement specifically saying he does not want the technique to be used to improve IQ, skin color etc of kids and makes a token condemnation of it: clearly this is again to assuage the moral compass of the Abrahamistic west. 6. Finally, he presents it as a
medical advance rather than eugenics without ever going into the wisdom of disrupting CCR5 and whether there could be unintended consequences. A sales pitch. We heard that He’s PhD adviser in mlechCha land is being investigated by his university to see if he has done something
unethical in advising this chIna who has left his lab. Clearly, shows the difference in mindset of the mlechCha-s vs the chIna-s. chIna-s almost think they own CRISPR. Hence, they wanted to show the mlechCha-s what they could do this is almost like bomb-demo aimed at them. In the
meantime the mlechCha scientists crippled by the Abrahamism in their society are feeling the burn of the chIna PR victory. We have have seen many fake chIna claims: could this be one? We will have to wait to see of they produce any solid evidence beyond their PR material but
technically this is not difficult with the current biotechnology and low-hanging fruit. I posit that the chIna-s are pursuing the forbidden fruits of the CRISPR Wong and super-Han albeit in secret. My own stance is not colored by Abrahamistic hold ups but I do thinks that this
form of eugenics needs more careful consideration: e.g. CCR5 is not there for nothing: do we know all about it before disrupting it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In some parts of the world aDNA studies have become a matter of fact tool for reconstructing lost history like this massive study of the Avar Khaghanate individuals from Hungary. Like the earlier study it shows the tale of "Mongols" before the Chingizids nature.com/articles/s4158…
It seems the East Asian component of the Avars in the west can be modeled best with Late Xiongnu& certain Xianbei (Serbi) individuals. We take the Xiongnu to be early members of the Mongolic branch, while as Shimunek demonstrated Xianbei to be early members of the Serbi branch of
Serbi-Mongolian (Serbi = para-Mongolic). When the Serib Khaghanate rose it incorporated several elements of the Xiongnu Hun Shanyuate into it. The Rouran Khaghanate that arose upon the disintegration of the Serbi, it was likely led by a Mongolic group. Even the name Mongol might
The early Arya-s imagined the tumulus (kurgan) as a shelter with the "mother" - i.e. earth. This is clarified in the tR^icha deployed for the funerary rite of the piling of the kurgan, i.e. shmashAna:
uch Chva~nchasva pR^ithivi mA ni bAdhathAH sUpAyanAsmai bhava sUpava~nchanA |
uchChva~nchamAnA pR^ithivI su tiShThatu sahasram mita upa hi shrayantAm |
gR^ihAso ghR^itashchuto bhavantu vishvAhAsmai sharaNAH santv atra ||
~May the earth stand piled high above him; verily upheld by a 1000 props. May it be
the house dripping with ghee; Through eternity may he be sheltered here! Truly that shelter on the steppe has been a great mechanism to understand our pitaraH.
The Israeli program to make best use of the high cognitive capacity of their people
Such a plan might work to some degree even among peoples with much lower pop. density of cognitive capacity but what they may lack is the necessary cohesion
via @Rjrasvapalladiummag.com/2024/01/26/the…
Many of the cognitive elite& their descendants who played a key role in the Soviet Rus programs moved Isr & added mental muscle to their capacity in the 1990s.
I'll mention one admittedly anecdotal case: met an individual who had served in the above. He was politically a mild guy: was ready to concede 2-state solution, wanted to sign treaties with the Mohds, was quite critical of his own politicians etc. An equivalent H guy would be
A 🧵on interdigitation in IE branches. 1 of the offshoots of the recent archaeogenetic work is the developing view that Greek- (Greco-Armenian) sprang directly out of Yamnaya, with Greeks sojourning in the upper Balkans before reaching the peninsula& islands. This is consistent
with certain linguistic (word) trees that favor an early branching of Greek (Greco-Armenian) after the basal most branches Anatolian & Tocharian. But until not long ago there was an alternative or partly overlapping linguistic hypothesis of Greco-Armeno-Aryan. Was that signal
entirely illusory or was there something to it that is still relevant. It has 3 dimensions: 1. Certain isoglosses; 2. Certain literary usages; 3. Certain seemingly apomorphic mythological elements. The linguists who see it as illusory generally take these shared features as
🧵Some "great books" for H educational reading with some comments 1. Excerpts from the 4 shruti-s & their a~Nga-s (I know many would go apoplectic with this suggestion: I see your point) 2. vedA~Nga-jyotiSha with numerical examples& practical observations of the sky
3. kaNAda's sUtra-s w commentarial material 4. excerpts from jaimini' sUtra-s with glosses 5. pata~njali's yogasUtra-s w vyAs-abhAShya 6. excerpts from itihAsa-s & harivaMsha 7. excerpts from proto-skandapurANa 8. readings from mAlinIvijaya, nishvAsa, netra, lakShmI, pauShkara
9. kumArasaMbhava 10. kAmasUtra of vAtsyAyana (I understand some people might object) 11. kauTilIya arthashAstra 12. readings from charaka, sushruta, vAgbhaTa & kAshyapa saMhitA. 13. e.g.s from the AryabhaTIya -- at least work out of kuTTaka & sine tables.
The ancient world, unlike many neo-occidentally conditioned folks, recognized that leadership of men was related to something special -- it could be seen as a the charisma seen only in a true leader. That's why we have approximately equivalent words: Skt: shrI; Iranic: Xvarena,
Turkic: kut, Mongolic: suu, Chinese: yun, Arabic: dawlat. That it cuts across religions and ethnicities in Eurasia indicates that it is something primal.Even the Austronesia Maoris had something called mana. At times of stress nation can only be led by men with that special thing
Despite the neo-occidental conditioning, one can see that the pull of this special charisma exists to date in the west. It is something an oligarchy deep state greatly fears for it would transfer the mandate from their shadow government to the "ekavIra". The word ekavIra is an