I feel like a lot of foreign correspondents in Kenya are missing the point of the critique of the @nytimes over the #RiversideAttack photos. /1
The majority of the tweets I’ve seen about this from #KOT have essentially said “please take down the photo of brutally murdered black people, esp since you wouldn’t show an equivalent photo if they were white.” /2
They asked the NYT reporter to take down the photo. She said she doesn’t pick the photos. Neither she nor some other foreign correspondents discussing this have acknowledged that showing dead bodies of some races but not others raises real questions of journalistic ethics. /3
There were subsequently angry calls from #KOT to deport the NYT reporter. Other foreign correspondents replied that this is an attack of freedom on the press. /4
Let me take a step back here. The NYT is an American paper. American media institutions tend to replicate racial hierarchies of power, because they were founded in a country predicated on racial hierarchies of power. They reflect and perpetuate the society around them. /5
There is lots of evidence across many domains that black people’s lives are valued less than whites’ in the US. In the media, this shows up in articles about police violence, which use mugshots of young black men murdered by police, and professional photos of their killers. /6
Papers will also embed videos of black people getting killed by police, even though many black activists point out that this is traumatizing. By contrast, there are also lots of white victims of police violence or mass shootings, but their bodies are rarely shown. /7
The point here is that US papers have ascertained, I think correctly, that seeing the dead bodies of their loved ones on the front page is hard for white people. But people of other races don’t seem to merit the same respect. /8
People sometimes respond “well, that type of photo captures the moment and is newsworthy.” But so would a photo of the bodies of the Parkland school shooting victims. If you’re making this argument, you need to think critically about why no one published the latter. /9
So basically, the #RiversideAttack photos are not an isolated incidence. They continue a long tradition of presenting white grief as important and black grief as irrelevant. /10
When #KOT pointed this out, orgs like the @nytimes and the @FCAEA responded in a way that essentially said, “Yes, your grief is irrelevant, and you’re making the whole situation worse by complaining about our actions.” /11
Journalism is a hugely challenging career. Lots of people do great work in tough circumstances for little budget. I get that the response to seeing another journalist criticized for something not her fault is to close ranks and disparage attacks on press freedom. /12
But it seems clear to me that defending press freedom by refusing to engage with very well substantiated critiques that your editorial practices are implicitly racist is not the way forward. /13
I’m a white American. We all grow up racist because that’s the society and institutions around us. We all need to actively unlearn what we’re taught. This includes pressing the US media to be better. /end
Adding a few more thoughts to this thread. I think freedom of the press is really important. In my view the NYT handled this situation badly, but it's not clear there was a deportable offense. I also think #KOT and journalists are talking past each other on this point. /15
There's a question of privilege here. In journalists' view, they often face threats for doing their work. The prospect of deportation is a real threat. Meanwhile, #KOT are pointing out that Western media has a long history of depicting Africans disrespectfully. /16
So journalists are saying, "the call for deporting a reporter you dislike is antidemocratic." And #KOT are saying "why do you get to disrespect us, then call us antidemocratic when we complain about it? Why do you get to set the rules of the game?" /17
Within Kenya, foreign correspondents are seen as people with a LOT of privilege. They get to shape coverage of African issues for the world. In this context, people feel that criticizing coverage which seems to perpetuate racism is speaking truth to power. /18
Of course, in many places journalists (esp local ones within Africa, and POC in the US) don't have a lot of privilege. In that context, having a bunch of angry people on Twitter calling for a reporter to be deported over a photo editor's decision seems extreme. /19
My analysis rests on the view that, in the context of racial politics in both the US and Kenya, the NYT is a privileged institution. It has a responsibility to listen to critiques from people it covers, who have relatively less privilege, and take them seriously. /20
To be clear, I also don't think that threatening a reporter with violence is appropriate. Someone pointed out to me that this is what the @FCAEA letter was responding to. /21
@FCAEA A lot of what I'm seeing in my mentions now is that both sides here have legitimate grievances (reporters want to be safe, Kenyans don't want to see racist photos in the paper), and are feeling pretty threatened. It's hard to listen with empathy in that context. /22

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh

Keep Current with Rachel Strohm

Rachel Strohm Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!


Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RachelStrohm

Apr 3, 2020
Thread: I've got a new piece out at @africaarguments talking about how public markets and cash transfers can mitigate the economic effects of coronavirus in Africa. It rounds up research from a lot of smart people on these issues. /1 africanarguments.org/2020/04/02/afr…
Over the last few weeks, I kept seeing articles saying "Africa can't replicate Europe's coronavirus response" without clearly specifying what should be done differently. I did a lot of reading about those options might be, for economic and public health response /2
By way of background, rich countries have considered ~4 types of response. Goal is to keep people healthy + keep the economy running till a vaccine is available. They involve different combinations of testing and public health spending /3
Read 25 tweets
Mar 14, 2020
I realized that I didn't know very much about how previous flu-like pandemics have spread in Africa. So I looked up a bunch of maps! Blog post here, thread to follow. (N.B. not an epidemiologist, not making claims about how COVID-19 might spread) /1 rachelstrohm.com/2020/03/14/wha…
I started w/ Wikipedia's list of flu pandemics, added SARS and seasonal flu. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Influenza… The three post-2000 pandemics are coronavirus (2020), H1N1 / swine flu (2009), SARS (2003). /2
Here's coronavirus as of 12 March 2020. Map source: foreignpolicy.com/2020/03/04/map…. Few cases in Africa, lots of debate over why (newscientist.com/article/223676…). Possibilities: little air traffic (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_avi…), improving public health systems (thinkglobalhealth.org/article/africa…). /3
Read 14 tweets
Mar 13, 2019
As someone from a rich family who went to an elite school, this framing is driving me nuts. Why? Because outright fraud / huge donations are outliers. Rich kids are more likely to end up at the Ivies because of STRUCTURAL problems with how we fund & run high schools in the US. /1
I saw a figure a while ago stating that ~60% of Dartmouth students came from families in the top 1% of the US income distribution. Most people had gone either to private high schools, or unusually well funded public high schools (as I did). /2
Private schools obviously cost money. Good public schools also cost money! B/c US public schools are generally funded through local property taxes, you have to be able to afford to buy an expensive house in a district with a good tax base (i.e. lots of other expensive houses) /3
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!


0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy


3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!