1/ Our parents were led to forget—no, outright reject—the ideological underpinnings that make the UK a nice place to live. Based on discussions with friends and family, apathy rules. Authorities have almost zero opposition, free to do as they please. “If youre not doing wrong...”
2/Nothing is real and relativism has completely taken hold. No one understands rights like private property or free speech, they’re not codified anywhere. There is no constitution or ethical framework to refer back to. That would be too rigid, “too ideological”.
3/ Instead, it’s considered better to make case by case judgement calls on how things make you feel. Stripped of formal philosophy, religion, and ideology, the majority are reduced to drones, intellectually inert and led by emotion. Virtue before logic. Great news for the media.
4/ Irrational, frothing disgust at partisan targets. Posh man bad. Orange man bad. Perpetual fear of nazis, paedophiles, Russian spies and capitalists. Restrict knife sales, watch out for hate, report neighbours, report colleagues, report friends.
5/ Relativism and its offspring, authoritarianism and socialism, are winning in the UK. Even the “right wing” are bereft of rhetoric about rights and liberty. The US has its problems but from my own anecdotal experience, the understanding and respect of freedom still runs strong.
6/ The UK on the other hand is in trouble, Brexit being or not, and it’s going to take some serious interventions to change course. Maybe bitcoin could help, but ultimately it’s going to take some strong voices to make people wake up.
7/ To wake up and restore the responsibility and dignity of the individual, and the respect for individual rights that made it successful in the modern past.
8/ To realise that making it up as you go along based on subjective feeings is not acceptable or sustainable and that we need reliable methods for social memory that prevent us from making the horrible mistakes of the past.
1/ In the event of a global internet shutdown, would that lead to a temporary halt of all transaction processing, with everything going back to normal as the internet is "switched back on"?
2/ During the shutdown, miners would still mine on their own local networks, and you would essentially get thousands of chain splits occurring as each miner mined its own chain separately.
3/ As the internet comes back on, all the “lighter” (less pow) chains would be wiped out in favour of the “heavier” (more pow) chain.
1/ The WEF’s “you’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy” is going further than we first realised.
At the foundation of private property, in any interpretation, is the ownership over oneself. The vaccine mandates are a culmination of the attack on this principle.
2/ A sacred wall has been broken, a new precedent set, in a carefully coordinated manner.
Your body is no longer absolutely your property, it is instead considered by the public and your rulers as a public good. A resource that people can fight over what to do with it.
3/ With that precedent set, you can be sure there will be plenty more debates over what to do with you and your body in society’s interest, to respond to a rolling series of crises in the future.
i. Price hits a minimum $100k+ peak.
ii. Western governments introduce unprecedented emergency regulations, such as withdrawal bans, turning off the buy button, and investor restrictions...
2/
...
iii. Price dumps, most of the new corporate investors panic sell.
iv. Repeat the usual halvening cycle, as hodlers of last resort hold the line at a higher low and the industry adapts, evolves, routes around the new regulations. Life, uh, finds a way.
3/ Some have likened Tesla's entry into bitcoin as a watershed moment of bitcoin finally mainstreaming. Well, with the mainstreaming, the real games begin, and bitcoin's proper enemies (not amateur-hour big blockers) rear their ugly, fanged heads.
1/ So much of the debate is around how deadly COVID is, or the effectiveness of the lockdowns, or the magnitude of the collateral damage.
But that immediately concedes the frame to the tyrants, both large and small.
2/ The implication of arguing in this fashion is that if the disease was actually that deadly, or the lockdowns were effective, or the collateral damage harmed fewer than it helped, then all this control and oppression might be acceptable.
3/ The implication is that imprisoning peaceful people, mandating what they wear, when they can do business, who they can meet, forcing people to die alone, and all the other evil stuff going on around the world right now *could* be okay *if* the disease was dangerous enough.
1/ The assault against open-source software that emerged recently will not be resolved by self-hosting alone.
One of the authorities’ obvious next steps, after GitHub has “harmonised” its platform, is to demand licenses to host any software and maybe even licenses to produce it.
2/ These new rules will be implemented in the name of “ensuring new technology fits with the values of society” and “guaranteeing that everyone has a democratic stake in how technology affects our lives.”
3/ The urgency of the regulations will be accelerated by two things:
(i) Bitcoin’s threat to the increasingly fragile and controlled fiat monetary system.
(ii) The emergence of decentralised, self-hosted communication apps that circumvent the censorship and encryption bans.