“Chavismo is subject to a level of scrutiny that applies nowhere else in Latin America. Where Venezuela is concerned, it would seem that we should be more understanding of such attempts at regicide.” versobooks.com/blogs/4235-ven…
"The two principal interests stoking the crisis have very precise goals. The United States looks to recover dominion over its “backyard”, while the Latin American elites want to bury the previous decade’s popular demands."
"If the coup conspirators... defeat Chavismo, they will move next on Bolivia & Cuba, extending neoliberal authoritarianism across the continent. The dispute over Venezuela is about the preservation of one of the last breakwaters as the reactionary tidal wave continues to expand."
"The current dilemma should in no way deter criticism of the decisions made by the Chavista government. But it is of vital importance to situate any critique within a shared battle against the putschists."
"Moreover, the current struggle calls for something more than the ambiguous neutrality expressed in recent pronouncements. By distancing themselves from the conflict’s protagonists, those declarations situate either side on a common plane."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
After weeks of US-generated war fever, European officials are finally fed up.
WashPost reports that "high-level European officials have expressed frustration that the United States had not shared the intelligence that led it to surmise Russia’s intentions with such certainty."
While Biden claims US intel has discovered that Russia plans to invade Ukraine, European officials "have not seen direct evidence."
“[W]e have no clear evidence ourselves that Putin has made up his mind and we have not seen anything that would suggest otherwise," one says.
EU officials say they've "been told little about [US] sources and methods... limiting their capacity to make independent decisions about how much weight to give statements from Biden that Putin has made a decision to attack."
In 2017, "rebel" death squads staged a CW attack. According to Sy Hersh, US ignored its own intel to endorse claims of Syrian gov't guilt. US then bombed Syria, drawing wide bipartisan & media praise.
(dw.com/en/is-assad-to…)
(welt.de/politik/auslan…) (archive.is/vMNtk)
In 2018, as we all know, Syria was also falsely accused of a chemical attack in Douma.
We know this because leaks have revealed that the OPCW found no evidence of a chemical attack, but then censored and doctored reports to claim otherwise. thegrayzone.com/category/opcw-…
This NYT article has so many hilarious lines that I may have to update the article I published earlier today on US media subservience to Biden admin’s Russia war-mongering: mate.substack.com/p/stoking-war-…
Well another major cult plank just got destroyed, from one of its main institutions: A new US intel report finds no ties between Russia & the far-right.
2/ Newly declassified report says US intel agencies "lack indications of Russian Government direct support – such as financing, material support. training, or guidance" to the global far-right.
3/ The best they can up with is that Russian-linked online activity "amplify politically divisive issues that probably contribute to RMVE radicalization and recruitment efforts worldwide." Just like every single other media "probably" does too.
US-Russia agree to reduce UNSC meetings on Syria chemical weapons allegations. NATO states have used the meetings to promote false allegations against Syria laundered via OPCW.
Perhaps a recognition in DC that the dirty war is lost, & the exploitation of OPCW too embarrassing.
Russia invited "guests criticizing or providing alternative findings to those of the Hague-based chemical weapons watchdog."
To understand the sadism of US policy toward Syria, check out what counts as a US "concession":
US agreed to exempt sanctions for "international charities and relief organizations" that "engage in... humanitarian activities that meet basic human needs" in Syria. How generous.
1/2 Spoke tonight about the Russiagate playbook, illustrated by the treatment of AP's Matt Lee, of US officials lodging allegations against Russia and then painting any skepticism as Kremlin subservience.
Its roots lie in partisan hackery & bipartisan neocon hegemony:
2/2 Rather than seek evidence like Mike Lee did, US journalists across the spectrum have accepted Russia-tied allegations on faith, giving us such hits as Trump Russia collusion, Russian bounties, Havana Syndrome, Hunter's laptop being Russian disinformation, and now Ukraine.
I believe this was the network debut, at least for me, of #BlueAnon.